Combining psychometric and biometric measures of substance use

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Volumn 83, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 95-103

  Lennox, Richard ^a   Dennis, Michael L ^b   Scott, Christy K ^b   Funk, Rod ^b  

^a Psychometric Technologies   (United States)

^b CHESTNUT HEALTH SYSTEMS   (United States)

Author keywords

Biometric measures; Psychometric measures

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMETRY; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISEASE SEVERITY; EMPIRICISM; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; SALIVA ANALYSIS; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; URINALYSIS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMETRICS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

CANNABIS SATIVA;

EID: 33646946574     PISSN: 03768716     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.10.016     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Amsel Z., Mandell W., Matthias L., Mason C., and Hocherman I. Reliability and validity of self-reported illegal activities and drug use collected from narcotic addicts. Int. J. Addict. 11 (1976) 325-336
2. Arbuckle J.L. AMOS 4.0 (Computer Software) (1999), Smallwaters, Chicago, IL
3. Bennett G.A., Davies E., and Thomas P. Is oral fluid analysis as accurate as urinalysis in detecting drug use in a treatment setting?. Drug Alcohol Depend. 72 (2003) 265-269
4. Bentler P.M., and Bonnet D.G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol. Bull. 88 (1980) 588-606
5. Bollen K., and Lennox R. Conventional wisdom on measurement: a structural equation perspective. Psychol. Bull. 110 (1991) 305-314
6. Bollen K.A. Structural Equations with Latent Variables (1989), Wiley, New York
7. Buchan B.J., Dennis M.L., Tims F.M., and Diamond G.S. Cannabis use: consistency and validity of self report, on-site urine testing, and laboratory testing. Addiction 97 (2002) S98-S108
8. Byrne B.M. Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming (2001), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
9. Campbell D.T., and Fiske D.W. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multi-trait-multi-method matrix. Psychol. Bull. 56 (1959) 81-105
10. Carroll K.M. Methodological issues and problems in the assessment of substance use. Psychol. Assess. 7 (1995) 349-358
11. Cone E.J., and Weddington Jr. W.W. Prolonged occurrence of cocaine in human saliva and urine after chronic use. J. Anal. Toxicol. 13 (1989) 65-68
12. Conway K.P., Kane R.J., Ball S.A., Poling J.C., and Rounsaville B.J. Personality, substance of choice, and polysubstance involvement among substance dependent patients. Drug Alcohol Depend. 71 (2003) 65-75
13. Cook R.F., Bernstein A.D., Arrington T.L., Andrews C.M., and Marshall G.A. Methods for assessing drug use prevalence in the workplace: a comparison of self-report, urinalysis, and hair analysis. Int. J. Addict. 30 (1995) 403-426
14. Cronbach L.J., and Meehl P.E. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol. Bull. 52 (1955) 281-302
15. Darke S. Self report among injecting drug users: a review. Drug Alcohol Depend. 51 (1998) 253-263
16. Del Boca F.K., and Darkes J. The validity of self-reports of alcohol consumption: state of the science and challenges for research. Addiction 98 S2 (2003) 1-12
17. Del Boca F.K., and Noll J.A. Truth or consequences: the validity of self-report data in health services research on addictions. Addiction 95 (2000) S347-S360
18. Dennis M.L. Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN): Administration Guide for the GAIN and Related Measures (Version 1299) (1999), Chestnut Health Systems, Bloomington, IL
19. Dennis M.L., Godley S.H., Diamond G., Tims F.M., Babor T., Donaldson J., Liddle H., Titus J.C., Kaminer Y., Webb C., Hamilton N., and Funk R. The Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT) study: main findings from two randomized trials. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 27 (2004) 197-213
20. Dennis M.L., Scott C.K., and Funk R. An experimental evaluation of recovery management checkups (RMC) for people with chronic substance use disorders. Eval. Program Plann. 26 (2003) 339-352
21. Dennis M.L., Titus J.C., White M., Unsicker J., and Hodgkins D. Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN): Administration Guide for the GAIN and Related Measures (2003), Chestnut Health Systems, Bloomington, IL. http://www.chestnut.org/li/gain (retrieved from http://www.chestnut.org/li/gain on 20 January 2005)
22. Feucht T.E., Stephens R.C., and Walker M.L. Drug use among juvenile arrestees: a comparison of self-report, urinalysis and hair assay. J. Drug Issues 24 (1994) 99-116
23. Godley M.D., Godley S.H., Dennis M.L., Funk R., and Passetti L. Preliminary outcomes from the assertive continuing care experiment for adolescents discharged from residential treatment. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 23 (2002) 21-32
24. Goldstein A., and Brown B.W. Urine testing in methadone maintenance treatment: applications and limitations. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 25 (2003) 61-63
25. Harrison L.D. The validity of self-reported data on drug use. J. Drug Issues 25 (1995) 91-111
26. Hasin D.S., Schuckit M.A., Martin C.S., Grant B.F., Bucholz K.K., and Helzer J.E. The validity of DSM-IV alcohol dependence: what do we know and what do we need to know?. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 27 (2003) 244-252
27. Hersh D., Mulgrew C.L., Van Kirk J., and Kranzler H.R. The validity of self-reported cocaine use in two groups of cocaine abusers. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 67 (1999) 37-42
28. Hu L., and Bentler P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equation Model. 6 (1999) 1-55
29. Katz C.M., Webb V.J., and Decker S.H. Using the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) program to further understand the relationship between drug use and gang membership. Justice Q. 22 (2005) 58-88
30. Kranzler H.R., Tennen H., Babor T.F., Kadden R.M., and Rounsaville B.J. Validity of the longitudinal, expert, all data procedure for psychiatric diagnosis in patients with psychoactive substance use disorders. Drug Alcohol Depend. 45 (1997) 93-104
31. Landry M., Brochu S., and Bergeron J. Validity and relevance of self-report data provided by criminalized addicted persons in treatment. Addict. Res. Theory 11 (2003) 415-426
32. Lennox R.D., and Dennis M.L. Measurement error issues in substance abuse services research: lessons from structural equation modeling and psychometric theory. Eval. Program Plann. 17 (1994) 399-407
33. Lennox R.D., Steele P., Zarkin G., and Bray J. The differential effects of alcohol consumption and dependence on adverse alcohol-related consequences. Drug Alcohol Depend. 50 (1998) 211-220
34. Lennox R.D., Zarkin G.A., and Bray J.W. Latent variable models of alcohol-related constructs. J. Subst. Abuse 8 (1996) 241-250
35. Marsh H.W., Balla J.R., and McDonald R.P. Goodness of fit indices in confirmatory factor analysis: the effect of sample size. Psychol. Bull. 103 (1988) 391-410
36. Matt G.E., Turingan M.R., Dinh Q.T., Felsch J.A., Hovell M.F., and Gehrman C. Improving self-reports of drug-use: numeric estimates as fuzzy sets. Addiction 98 (2003) 1239-1247
37. Matt G.E., and Wilson S.J. Describing the frequency of marijuana use: fuzziness and context-dependent interpretation of frequency expressions. Eval. Program Plann. 17 (1994) 357-369
38. McNagny S.E., and Parker R.M. High prevalence of recent cocaine use and the unreliability of patient self-report in an inner-city walk-in clinic. JAMA 267 (1992) 1106-1108
39. Messina N.P., Wish E.D., Nemes S., and Wraight B. Correlates of underreporting of post-discharge cocaine use among therapeutic community clients. J. Drug Issues 30 (2000) 119-132
40. Mieczkowski T. The accuracy of self-reported drug use: an evaluation and analysis of new data. In: Weisheit R. (Ed). Drugs, Crime and the Criminal Justice System (1990), Anderson Publishing, Cincinnati, OH 275-302
41. Mieczkowski T., Barzelay D., Gropper B., and Wish E. Concordance of three measures of cocaine use in an arrestee population: hair, urine, and self-report. J. Psychoactive Drugs 23 (1991) 241-249
42. Nelson D.B., Kotranski L., Semaan S., Collier K., Lauby J., Feighan K., and Halbert J. The validity of self-reported opiate and cocaine use by out-of-treatment drug users. J. Drug Issues 28 (1998) 483-494
43. O'Brien C.P., and Lynch K.G. Can we design and replicate clinical trials with a multiple drug focus?. Drug Alcohol Depend. 70 (2003) 135-137
44. Preston, K.L., Silverman, K., Schuster, C.R., Cone, E.J., 1997. Comparison of self-report drug use with quantitative and qualitative urinalysis for assessment of drug use in treatment studies. In: Harrison, L., Hughes, A. (Eds.), The Validity of Self-Reported Drug Use: Improving the Accuracy of Survey Estimates. Rockville, MD, NIDA Research Monograph, No. 167, pp. 130-145.
45. Rounsaville B.J., Petry N.M., and Carroll K.M. Single versus multiple drug focus in substance abuse clinical trials research. Drug Alcohol Depend. 70 (2003) 117-125
46. Scott C.K., Dennis M.L., and Foss M.A. Recovery management checkups to shorten the cycle of relapse, treatment re-entry, and recovery. Drug Alcohol Depend. 78 (2005) 325-338
47. Shane P., Jasiukaitis P., and Green R.S. Treatment outcomes among adolescents with substance abuse problems: the relationship between comorbidities and post-treatment substance involvement. Eval. Program Plann. 26 (2003) 393-402
48. Skog O.J. The validity of self-reported drug use. Br. J. Addict. 87 (1992) 539-548
49. Stephens R. The truthfulness of addict responses in research projects. Int. J. Addict. 7 (1972) 549-558
50. Stephens R.C., and Feucht T.E. Reliability of self-reported drug use and urinalysis in the drug use forecasting system. Prison J. 73 (1993) 279-289
51. Strain E.C. Single versus multiple drug focus in substance abuse clinical trials research: the devil is in the details. Drug Alcohol Depend. 70 (2003) 131-134
52. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Results from the 2002 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings (2003), SAMHSA, Rockville, MD (Office of Applied Studies, NHSDA Series H-22, DHHS Publication No. SMA 03-3836)
53. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-2001. National Admissions to Substance Abuse Treatment Services, DASIS Series: S-20 (2003), SAMHSA, Rockville, MD (DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 03-3778)
54. Tucker L.R., and Lewis C. The reliability of coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika 38 (1973) 1-10
55. Visher C., and McFadden K. A Comparison of Urinalysis Technologies for Drug Testing in Criminal Justice (1991), National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC
56. Weatherby N.L., Needle R., Cesari H., Booth R., McCoy C., Watters J., Williams M., and Chitwood D. Validity of self-reported drug use among injection drug users and crack cocaine users recruited through street outreach. Eval. Program Plann. 17 (1994) 347-355
57. Wish E.D., Hoffman J.A., and Nemes S. The validity of self-reports of drug use at treatment admission and at follow-up: comparisons with urinalysis and hair assays. In: Harrison L. (Ed). The Validity of Self-Reports: The Implications for Survey Research (1997), National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD 200-225