Intestinal bacterial community and growth performance of chickens fed diets containing antibiotics

Poultry Science

Volumn 85, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 747-752

  Pedroso, A A ^a   Menten, J F M ^a   Lambais, M R ^a   Racanicci, A M C ^a   Longo, F A ^a   Sorbara, J O B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Antibiotic; Broiler; Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis; Microbiota

Indexed keywords

AVES; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); GALLUS GALLUS;

ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; BACTERIAL DNA; RNA 16S;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL FOOD; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM; CHICKEN; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIET; DRUG EFFECT; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; INTESTINE; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; MALE; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ANIMAL FEED; ANIMALS; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; BACTERIA; CHICKENS; DIET; DNA, BACTERIAL; INTESTINES; MALE; PHYLOGENY; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 16S; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 33646945628     PISSN: 00325791     EISSN: 15253171     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ps/85.4.747     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Amann, R. I., W. Ludwig, and K. H. Schleifer. 1995. Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol. Rev. 59:143-169.
2. Bryant, M. P. 1997. Introduction to gastrointestinal microbial ecology. Pages 3-12 in Gastrointestinal Microbiology: Gastrointestinal Ecosystems and Fermentation. R. I. Mackie, and B. A. White, ed. Chapman & Hall, New York, NY.
3. Collier, C. T., M. R. Smiricky-Tjardes, D. M. Albin, J. E. Wubben, V. M. Garbet, B. Deplancke, D. Bane, D. B. Anderson, and H. R. Gaskin. 2003. Molecular ecological analysis of porcine ileal microbiota responses to antimicrobial growth promoters. J. Anim. Sci. 81:3035-3045.
4. Cury, J. C. 2002. Atividade microbiana e diversidades metabólica e genética em solos de mangue contaminado com petróleo. M.S. Thesis. University of São Paulo, Brazil.
5. Felske, A., A. D. L. Akkermans, and W. M. de Vos. 1998. Quantification of 16S rRNAs in complex bacterial communities by multiple competitive reverse transcription-PCR in temperature gradient gel electrophoresis fingerprints. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64:4581-4587.
6. Guan, L., K. E. Hagen, G. W. Tannock, D. R. Korver, G. M. Fasenko, and G. E. Allison. 2003. Detection and identification of Lactobacillus species in crops of broilers of different ages by using PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:6750-6757.
7. Hume, M. E., L. F. Kubena, T. S. Edrington, C. J. Donskey, R. W. Moore, S. C. Ricke, and D. J. Nisbet. 2003. Poultry digestive microflora biodiversity as indicated by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Poult. Sci. 82:1100-1107.
8. Jackson, M. D., S. J. Gould, and T. M. Zabriskie. 2002. Studies on the formation and incorporation of streptolidine in the biosynthesis of the peptidyl nucleoside antibiotic streptothricin F. J. Org. Chem. 67:2934-2941.
9. Klasing, K. C. 1998. Comparative Avian Nutrition. CAB Int., Wallingford, UK.
10. Knarreborg, A., M. A. Simon, R. M. Engberg, B. B. Jensen, and G. W. Tannock. 2002. Effects of dietary fat source and subtherapeutic levels of antibiotic on the bacterial community in the ileum of broiler chickens at various ages. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:6425-6428.
11. Krause, D. O., C. S. McSweeney, and R. J. Forster. 1999. Molecular ecological methods to study fibrolytic ruminal bacteria: Phylogeny, competition and persistence. Pages 15-19 in 8th Int. Symp. Microb. Ecol. Canada Soc. Microb. Ecol., Halifax, Canada.
12. Lu, J., U. Idris, B. Harmon, C. Hofacre, J. J. Maurer, and M. D. Lee. 2003. Diversity and succession of the intestinal bacterial community of the maturing broiler chicken. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:6816-6824.
13. McCracken, V. J., J. M. Simpson, R. I. Mackie, and H. R. Gaskin. 2001. Molecular ecological analysis of dietary and antibiotic-induced alterations of the mouse intestinal microbiota. Nutr. Methodol. 131:1862-1870.
14. Moore, L. V. H., and L. H. Moore. 1995. Intestinal floras of populations that have a high risk of colon cancer. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61:3202-3207.
15. Moore, W. E., and L. V. Holdeman. 1974. Human fecal flora: The normal flora of 20 Japanese-Hawaiians. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 27:961-979.
16. Muyzer, G., and K. Smalla. 1998. Application of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TGGE) in microbial ecology. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 73:127-141.
17. Muyzer, G., E. C. Waal, and A. G. Uitterlinden. 1993. Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59:695-700.
18. National Research Council. 1996. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Nat. Acad. Press, Washington, DC.
19. Netherwood, T. N., H. I. Gilbert, D. S. Parker, and A. G. O'Donnell. 1999. Probiotics shown to change bacterial community structure in the avian gastrointestinal tract. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:5134-5138.
20. Ovreas, L., L. Forney, F. L. Daae, and V. Torsvik. 1997. Distribution of bacterioplankton in meromictic Lake Saelevannet, as determined by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of PCR-amplified gene fragments coding for 16S rRNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:3367-3373.
21. Pedroso, A. A., J. F. M. Menten, and M. R. Lambais. 2005. The structure of bacterial community in the intestines of newly hatched chicks. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 15:232-237.
22. Pryde, S. E., A. J. Richardson, and C. S. Steward. 1999. Molecular analysis of the microbial diversity present in the colonic wall, colonic lumen and cecal lumen of a pig. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:5372-5377.
23. Raskin, L., W. N. Capman, R. Sharp, and D. A. Stahl. 1997. Molecular ecology of gastrointestinal ecosystems. Pages 246-298 in Gastrointestinal Microbiology: Gastrointestinal Microbes and Host Interactions Ecosystems and Fermentation. R. I. Mackie, B. A. White, and R. E. Isaacson, ed. Chapman & Hall, New York, NY.
24. SAS Institute. 1998. SAS User's Guide: Statistics, Version 8. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC.
25. Simpson, J. M., V. J. McCracken, H. R. Gaskin, and R. I. Mackie. 1999. Application of denaturant gradient gel electrophoresis for the analysis of the porcine gastrointestinal microbiota. J. Microbiol. Methods 36:167-179.
26. Stern, N. J. 1994. Mucosal competitive exclusion to diminish colonization of chicken by Campylobacter jejuni. Poult. Sci. 73:402-407.
27. Systat. 1996. Systat User's Guide Statistics. Version 9. Systat, Washington, DC.
28. Tannock, G. W. 1998. Studies of intestinal microflora: A prerequisite for the development of probiotics. Int. Dairy J. 8:527-533.
29. van der Wielen, P. W., J. J. Biesterveld, S. Notermans, H. Hofstra, B. A. P. Urlings, and F. van Knapen. 2000. Role of volatile fatty acids in development of the cecal microflora in broiler chickens during growth. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:2536-2540.
30. van der Wielen, P. W., D. A. Keuzenkamp, L. J. Lipman, F. van Knapen, and S. Biesterveld. 2002. Spatial and temporal variation of the intestinal bacterial community in commercially raised broiler chickens during growth. Microb. Ecol. 44:286-293.
31. Willis, W. L., C. Murray, and C. Talbott. 2002. Campylobacter isolation trends of cage versus floor broiler chickens: A oneyear study. Poult. Sci. 81:629-631.
32. Zhu, X. Y., T. Zhong, Y. Pandya, and R. D. Joerger. 2002. 16S rRNA-Based analysis of microbiota from cecum of broiler chickens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:124-137.