Contextual genetics

Trends in Genetics

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 314-319

  McClearn, Gerald E ^a,b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b JÖNKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; GENE INTERACTION; GENETIC EPISTASIS; GENETIC REGULATION; GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; HEREDITY; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPIC VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ANIMALS; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; FEMALE; GENOTYPE; HOMOZYGOTE; MALE; MICE; MICE, INBRED STRAINS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 33646931535     PISSN: 01689525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2006.04.005     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Yates F.E. Self-organizing systems. In: Boyd C.A.R., and Noble D. (Eds). The Logic of Life (1993), Oxford University Press
2. Thompson B. Canonical Correlation Analysis: Uses and Interpretation (1984), Sage Publications
3. Mayr E. Toward a New Philosophy of Biology: Observations of an Evolutionist (1988), Belknap Press, Harvard University Press
4. rd edn (1996), MIT Press
5. Fernandez J.R., et al. Epistatic quantitative trait loci for alcohol preference in mice. Behav. Genet. 30 (2000) 431-437
6. Leiter E.H., et al. The influence of genetic background on the expression of mutations at the diabetes locus in the mouse. Diabetes 30 (1981) 1029-1034
7. Coleman D.L., and Hummel K.P. Influence of genetic background on the expression of mutations at the diabetes locus in the mouse. II. Studies on background modifiers. Isr. J. Med. Sci. 11 (1975) 708-713
8. Morice E., et al. Phenotypic expression of the targeted null-mutation in the dopamine transporter gene varies as a function of the genetic background. Eur. J. Neurosci. 20 (2004) 120-126
9. Dominguez-Salazar E., et al. Background matters: the effects of estrogen receptor α gene disruption on male sexual behavior are modified by background strain. Horm. Behav. 46 (2004) 482-490
10. Bilkei-Gorzo A., et al. Behavioral phenotype of pre-proenkephalin-deficient mice on diverse congenic backgrounds. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 176 (2004) 343-352
11. Roberts R.C. Some concepts and methods in quantitative genetics. In: Hirsch J. (Ed). Behavior-Genetic Analysis (1967), McGraw-Hill
12. Bonner J.T. The Evolution of Complexity by Means of Natural Selection (1988), Princeton University Press
13. Kauffman S.A. The Origins of Order (1993), Oxford University Press
14. Fosmire G.J., et al. Genetic influences on tissue deposition of aluminum in mice. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 37 (1993) 115-121
15. Vieira C., et al. Genotype-environment interaction for quantitative trait loci affecting life span in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 154 (2000) 213-227
16. Collins R.L. Inheritance of avoidance conditioning in mice: a diallel study. Science 143 (1964) 1188-1190
17. Crabbe J., et al. Genetics of mouse behavior: interactions with laboratory environment. Science 284 (1999) 1670-1672
18. Wahlsten D., et al. Different data from different labs: lessons from studies of gene-environment interaction. J. Neurobiol. 54 (2003) 283-311
19. Campeau S., et al. Elicitation and reduction of fear: behavioural and neuroendocrine indices and brain induction of the immediate-early gene c-fos. Neuroscience 78 (1997) 1087-1104
20. Ons S., et al. Stress-induced activation of the immediate early gene Arc (activity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein) is restricted to telencephalic areas in the rat brain: relationship to c-fos mRNA. J. Neurochem. 89 (2004) 1111-1118
21. McMahon A., et al. Regulation of tyrosine hydroxylase and dopamine beta-hydroxylase mRNA levels in rat adrenals by a single and repeated immobilization stress. J. Neurochem. 58 (1992) 2124-2130
22. Emmert M.H., and Herman J.P. Differential forebrain c-fos mRNA induction by ether inhalation and novelty: evidence for distinctive stress pathways. Brain Res. 845 (1999) 60-67
23. Figueiredo H.F., et al. The medial prefrontal cortex differentially regulates stress-induced c-fos expression in the forebrain depending on type of stressor. Eur. J. Neurosci. 18 (2003) 2357-2364
24. Rusnák M., et al. Effect of novel stressors on gene expression of tyrosine hydroxylase and monoamine transporters in brainstem noradrenergic neurons of long-term repeatedly immobilized rats. Brain Res. 899 (2001) 20-34
25. Pohorecky L.A., et al. Social hierarchy affects gene expression for catecholamine biosynthetic enzymes in rat adrenal glands. Neuroendocrinology 80 (2004) 42-51
26. Smith M.A., et al. Induction of c-fos mRNA in rat brain by conditioned and unconditioned stressors. Brain Res. 578 (1992) 135-141
27. Waterland R.A., et al. Post-weaning diet affects genomic imprinting at the Insulin-Like Growth Factor 2 (Igf-2) locus. Hum. Mol. Genet. 15 (2006) 705-716
28. Meaney M.J. Maternal care, gene expression, and the transmission of individual differences in stress reactivity across generations. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24 (2001) 1161-1192
29. Weaver I.C., et al. Maternal effects on the hippocampal transcriptome and anxiety-mediated behaviors in the offspring that are reversible in adulthood. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103 (2006) 3480-3485
30. Plomin R., et al. Behavioral Genetics. 4th edn (2001), Worth Publishers
31. Cavener D. Preference for ethanol in Drosophila melanogaster associated with the alcohol dehydrogenase polymorphism. Behav. Genet. 9 (1979) 359-365
32. Nesselroade J. Intraindividual variability and short-term change. Gerontology 50 (2004) 44-47
33. Murphy E.A., and Trojak J.L. The genetics of quantifiable homeostasis: I. The general issues. Am. J. Med. Genet. 24 (1986) 159-169
34. Cheverud J.M., et al. Quantitative trait loci for murine growth. Genetics 142 (1996) 1305-1319
35. McClearn G.E., et al. Developmental loss of effect of chromosome 15 QTL on alcohol preference. Mamm. Genome 9 (1998) 991-994
36. McGaugh J.L., and Cole J.M. Age and strain differences in the effect of distribution of practice on maze learning. Psychon. Sci. 2 (1965) 253-254
37. Tryon R.C. Genetic differences in maze-learning ability in rats. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education 39 (1940) 111-119
38. Michiels, S., et al. Prediction of cancer outcome with microarrays: a multiple random validation strategy. Lancet 365, 488-492
39. Shields R. MIAME, we have a problem. Trends Genet. 22 (2006) 65-66
40. Draghici S., et al. Reliability and reproducibility issues in DNA microarray measurements. Trends Genet. 22 (2006) 101-109
41. Ioannidis J.P.A. Microarrays and molecular research: noise discovery?. Lancet 365 (2005) 454-455
42. Miron M., and Nadon R. Inferential literacy for experimental high-throughput biology. Trends Genet. 22 (2006) 84-89
43. Potter J.D. Epidemiology, cancer genetics and microarrays: making correct inferences, using appropriate designs. Trends Genet. 19 (2003) 690-695
44. Falconer D.S., and Mackay T.F.C. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. 4th edn (1996), Longman Group
45. McClearn, G.E. et al. (1970) The use of isogenic and heterogenic mouse stocks in behavioral research. In Contributions to Behavior-Genetic Analysis: The Mouse as a Prototype. (Lindzey, G., and Thiessen, D.D., eds) Appleton-Century-Crofts
46. McClearn G.E., and Hofer S.M. Genes as gerontological variables: uses of genetically heterogeneous stocks. Neurobiol. Aging 20 (1999) 147-156
47. Miller R.A., et al. Exotic mice as models for aging research: polemic and prospectus. Neurobiol. Aging 20 (1999) 217-231
48. Wolfer D.P., et al. Assessing the effects of the 129/Sv genetic background on swimming navigation learning in transgenic mutants: a study using mice with a modified beta-amyloid precursor protein gene. Brain Res. 771 (1997) 1-13
49. Phillips T.J., and Belknap J.K. Complex-trait genetics: emergence of multivariate strategies. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3 (2002) 478-485
50. Plomin R., et al. Behavioral genomics. In: Plomin R., et al. (Ed). Behavioral Genetics in the Postgenomic Era (2003), American Psychological Association
51. Cohen J., and Rice S.H. Where do biochemical pathways lead?. In: Collado-Vides J., et al. (Ed). Integrative Approaches to Molecular Biology (1996), MIT Press