How social marketing works in health care

BMJ

Volumn 332, Issue 7551, 2006, Pages 1207-

  Evans, W Douglas ^a  

^a RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH PROMOTION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICE; REVIEW; SOCIAL MARKETING; ATTENTION; COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH EDUCATION; MULTIMEDIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPHYLAXIS;

COMMUNICATION; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH PROMOTION; MARKETING OF HEALTH SERVICES; PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICES; SOCIAL MARKETING;

EID: 33646922067     PISSN: 09598138     EISSN: 14685833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.332.7551.1207-a     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Andreasen A. Marketing social change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1995.
2. Borden N. The concept of the marketing mix. J Advertis Res 1964; 4: 2–7.
3. Petty RE, Cacioppo JT. Communication and persuasion: central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1986.
4. Backer TE, Rogers EM, Sonory P. Designing health communication campaigns: what works? Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1992.
5. Hornik RC. Public health communication: evidence for behavior change. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2002.
6. National Cancer Institute. Making health communication programs work: a planner's guide. Bethesda, MD: NCI, 2002.
7. Kreuter M, Farrell D, Olevitch L, Brennan L. Tailored health messages: customizing communication with computer technology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2000.
8. US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2010: understanding and improving health. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 2000.
9. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages of change in the modification of problem behaviors. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1992.
10. PACT Agencies. PACT: positioning advertising copy testing. J Advertis 1982; 11: 3–29.
11. Aaker D. Building strong brands. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996.
12. Hornik R, Yanovitsky I. Using theory to design evaluations of communication campaigns: the case of the national youth anti-drug media campaign. Commun Theory 2003; 13: 204–224.
13. Evans D, Price S, Blahut S. Evaluating the truthTM brand. J Health Commun 2005; 10: 181–192.
14. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1986.
15. Huhman M, Heitzler C, Wong F. The VERB campaign logic model: a tool for planning and evaluation. Prev Chronic Dis 2004; 1(3): A11.
16. Farrelly MC, Davis KC, Haviland ML, Messeri P, Healton CG. Evidence of a dose-response relationship between “truth” antismoking ads and youth smoking. Am J Public Health 2005; 95: 425–431.
17. Snyder LB, Hamilton MA. Meta-analysis of U.S. health campaign effects on behavior: emphasize enforcement, exposure, and new information, and beware the secular trend. In: Hornik R, ed. Public health communication: evidence for behavior change. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 2002: 357–383.
18. Grilli R, Freemantle N, Minozzi S, Domenighetti G, Finer D. Mass media interventions: effects on health services utilization (Cochrane review). Cochrane Library. Issue 3. Oxford: Update Software, 2000: CD000389.
19. Snyder LB, Diop-Sidibé N, Badiane LA. Meta-analysis of the impact of family planning campaigns conducted by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health/Center for Communication Programs. Presented at the International Communication Association annual meeting, San Diego: May 2003.
20. Hornik RC. Public health education and communication as policy instruments for bringing about changes in behavior. In: Goldberg M, Fishbein M, Middlestadt S, eds. Social marketing. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1997: 45–60.