Environmental patterns and gradients in the vascular plants and bryophytes of eastern Fennoscandian herb-rich forests

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 229, Issue 1-3, 2006, Pages 73-87

  Hokkanen, Päivi J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

Boreal zone; Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA); Classification; Distribution pattern; Ecological gradients; Forest classification; Land use history; Moisture; Nutrients; Soil properties; Stand characteristics; Topography; Vegetation

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEMS; MOISTURE; PLANTS (BOTANY); SOILS; VEGETATION; WATER;

BOREAL ZONE; CANONICAL CORRESPONDENCE ANALYSIS; CLASSIFICATION; DISTRIBUTION PATTERN; ECOLOGICAL GRADIENTS; FOREST CLASSIFICATION; LAND USE HISTORY; NUTRIENTS; SOIL PROPERTIES; STAND CHARACTERISTICS;

FORESTRY;

BIODIVERSITY; BOREAL FOREST; CALCIUM; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; SODIUM; SOIL MOISTURE; VASCULAR PLANT;

ECOSYSTEMS; FORESTRY; MOISTURE; PLANTS; SOIL; WATER;

EURASIA; EUROPE; FENNOSCANDIA; FINLAND; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA;

BRYOPHYTA; BRYOPHYTES; TRACHEOPHYTA;

EID: 33646916375     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.03.025     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Airaksinen O., and Kartttunen K. Natura 200-habitats manual. Environment Guide, vol. 46. second ed. (2001), Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki (In Finnish with English summary)
2. Alanen A., Leivo A., Lindgren L., and Piri E. Lehtojen hoito-opas. Metsähallituksen luonnonsuojelujulkaisuja B 26 (1996) 1-128
3. Alapassi M., and Alanen A. Lehtojen suojelutyöryhmän mietintö. Komiteanmietintö vol. 16 (1988), Ministry of Environment, Helsinki
4. Anand M., Laurence S., and Rayfield B. Diversity relationships among taxonomic groups in recovering and restored forests. Conserv. Biol. 19 3 (2005) 955-962
5. Atlas of Finland, 1987. Climate, folio 131. National Broad of Survey & Geographical Society of Finland, Helsinki.
6. Branstreet R.B. The Kjeldahl Method for Organic Nitrogen (1965), Academic press, New York and London
7. Braun-Blanquet, J., 1932. Plant Sociology. New York.
8. Cajander A.K. Ueber Waldtypen. Fennia 28 2 (1909) 1-175 (Acta Forest Fennica 1)
9. Cajander A.K. The theory of forests types. Acta Forest. Fenn. 29 5 (1926) 1-108
10. DeLuca T.H., Zackrisson O., Nilsson M.-C., and Sellstedt A. Quantifying nitrogen-fixation in feather moss carpets of boreal forests. Nature 419 31 (2002) 917-920
11. Eurola S., Bendiksen K., and Rönkä A. Suokasviopas. Oulanka Rep. 11 (1992) 1-125
12. Finnish Meteorological Institute, 1991. Climatological statistics in Finland 1961-1990. Supplement to the Finnish Meteorological Yearbook.
13. Frey T.E.A. The Finnish school and forest site types. In: Whittaker R.H. (Ed). Classification of Plant Communities (1978) 81-110
14. Gould W.A., and Walker M.D. Plant communities and landscape diversity along a Canadian Artic river. J. Veg. Sci. 10 (1999) 537-548
15. Grönlund A., and Hakalisto S. Management of traditional rural landscapes in Koli national park. Separate Plan of Koli national park. Regional Environmental Publications, vol. 104 (1998), North Karelia Regional Environment Centre, Joensuu (In Finnish with English summary)
16. Halonen, O., Tulkki, H., 1981. Ravinneanalyysien työohjeet. The Finnish Forest Research Institute. Research Papers, 36, pp. 1-23.
17. Heikkinen R.K. Multivariate analysis of esker vegetation in southern Häme S. Finland. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 28 (1991) 201-224
18. Heino, R., Hellsten, E., 1983. Climatological statistics in Finland 1961-1980. Supplement to the Finnish Meteorological Yearbook.
19. Hokkanen P.J. Vascular plant communities in boreal herb-rich forests in Koli, eastern Finland. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 40 (2003) 153-176
20. Hokkanen P.J. Bryophyte communities in herb-rich forests in Koli, eastern Finland Comparison of forest classifications based on bryophytes and vascular plants. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 41 (2004) 331-365
21. In: Hämet-Ahti L., Suominen J., Ulvinen T., and Uotila P. (Eds). Retkeilykasvio. (Field flora of Finland) (1998), Botanical Museum, Finnish Museum of Natural History, Helsinki (In Finnish with English summary)
22. Ingerpuu N., Kull K., and Vellak K. Bryophyte vegetation in a woodland meadow: relationships with phanerogam diversity and responses to fertilisation. Plant Ecol. 134 (1998) 163-171
23. Ingerpuu N., Vellak K., Kukk T., and Pärtel M. Bryophyte and vascular species richness in boreo-nemoral moist forests and mires. Biodivers. Conserv. 10 (2001) 2153-2166
24. Ingerpuu N., Vellak K., Liira J., and Pärtel M. Relationships between species richness patterns in deciduous forests at the north Estonian limestone escarpment. J. Veg. Sci. 14 (2003) 773-780
25. In: Jalas J. (Ed). Suuri kasvikirja I (1958), Kustannusosakeyhtiö Otava, Helsinki
26. In: Jalas J. (Ed). Suuri kasvikirja II (1965), Kustannusosakeyhtiö Otava, Helsinki
27. In: Jalas J. (Ed). Suuri kasvikirja III (1980), Kustannusosakeyhtiö Otava, Helsinki
28. Kaakinen, E., 1972. Studies on herb-rich forest vegetation in southern Kainuu, northern Finland. Aquilo, Ser. Bot. 11, 23-42.
29. Kaakinen, E., 1974. Kainuun ja Kuusamon lehtokasvillisuudesta. Ph. LIc. Thesis. Department of Botany, University of Oulu.
30. Kaakinen E. Lehtokeskukset-ravinteisuuden ja lajirikkauden saarekkeet. Savon luonto 14 (1982) 34-40
31. Kaakinen E. Finnish herb-rich forests. Memoranda Societatis pro Fauna et Flora Fennica 68 (1992) 67-71 (In Finnish with English summary)
32. Kalliola R. Suomen kasvimaantiede (1973), WSOY, Porvoo
33. Kivekäs J. Kaskiviljelyksen vaikutus eräisiin maan ominaisuuksiin Summary in German: Über den Einfluss der Brandkultur auf einige Eigenschaften des Bodens, vol. 27, no. 2 (1939), Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae pp. 1-44
34. Kujala V. Forest types of Finland. Commun. Inst. For. Fenn. 92 8 (1979) 1-45 (In Finnish with English summary)
35. Kuusipalo J. An ecological study of upland forest site classification in Southern Finland. Acta Forest. Fenn. 192 (1985) 1-77
36. Kuusipalo J. Suomen metsätyypit (1996), Kirjayhtymä, Helsinki
37. Linkola K. Studien über den Einfluss der Kultur auf die Flora in den Gegenden Nördlich vom Ladogasee I. Allgemeiner Teil. Acta Societatis pro Fauna et Flora Fennica 45 1 (1916) 1-491
38. Lohilahti H. Menneisyyden poluilla Kolin-Herajärven perinnepolku (2000), North-Karelia Regional Environmental Centre, Joensuu
39. Longton R.E. The role of bryophytes and lichens in terrestrial ecosystems. In: Bates J.W., and Farmer A.M. (Eds). Bryophytes and Lichens in a Changing Environment (1992), Clarendon Press, Oxford 33-76
40. Lyytikäinen A. Kolin luonto, maisema ja kulttuurihistoria Kolin luonnonsuojelututkimukset. Vesi-ja ympäristöhallituksen monistesarja 308 (1991) 1-111
41. Mannerkoski H. Maaperä lehtojen luokittelussa. In: Tyynelä T., and Pelkonen P. (Eds). Metsien kokonaisarvon jäljillä-In search of a total value for forests vol. 50 (2005), Professori Olli Saastamoinen 60 vuotta, Silva Carelia 150-156
42. McCune B. Influence of noisy environmental data on canonical correspondence analysis. Ecology 78 8 (1997) 2617-2623
43. McCune, B., Mefford, M.J., 1999. PC-ORD. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data, Version 4.0. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Oregon.
44. Myers N., Mittermeier R.A., Mittermeier C.G., da Fonseca G.A.B., and Kent J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403 (2000) 853-858
45. Mäkirinta U. Haintypenuntersuchungen im mittleren Süd-Häme Süd-finnland. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 5 (1968) 34-64
46. Okko V. Maaperä. In: Rankama K. (Ed). Suomen Geologia (1964), Kirjayhtymä, Helsinki 239-332
47. Økland R.H. Are ordination and constrained ordination alternative or complementary strategies in general ecological studies?. J. Veg. Sci. 7 (1996) 289-292
48. Økland R.H., and Eilertsen O. Canonical correspondence analysis with variation portioning: some comments and application. J. Veg. Sci. 5 (1994) 117-126
49. Pankakoski A. Ekologis-kasvistollisia tutkimuksia Hiisjärven luonnonpuistossa. Annales Botanici Soc.Vanamo 10 3 (1939) 1-154
50. Pesola V. Calcium carbonate as a factor in the distribution of plants in Finland. Annales Societatis Zoologi-Botanicae Fennicae Vanamo 9 1 (1928) 1-248 (In Finnish with English summary)
51. Piirainen T., Honkamo M., and Rossi S. A preliminary report of the geology of the Koli area. Bull. Geol. Soc. Finland 46 (1974) 161-166
52. Qian H., Klinka K., Økland R.H., Krestov P., and Kayahara G.J. Understorey vegetation in boreal Humus form types Picea mariana and Populus tremuloides stands in British Columbia. J. Veg. Sci. 14 (2003) 173-184
53. Quinn G.P., and Keough M.J. Experimental Design and Data Analysis for biologists. second ed. (2003), The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, Cambridge
54. Ranta E., Rita H., and Kouki J. Tilastotiedettä ekologeille. seventh ed. (1999), Helsinki University Press, Helsinki
55. In: Rassi P., Alanen A., Kanerva T.E., and Mannerkoski I. (Eds). The 2000 Red List of Finnish Species. (2001), Ministry of the Environment & Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki (In Finnish with English summary)
56. In: Reinikainen A., Mäkipää R., Vanha-Majamaa I., and Hotanen J.-P. (Eds). Kasvit muuttuvassa metsäluonnossa (Changes in the frequency and abundance of forest and mire plants in Finland since 1950 (2001), Kustannusosakeyhtiö Tammi, Helsinki
57. Simonen A. Kallioperä. In: Rankama K. (Ed). Suomen Geologia (1964), Kirjayhtymä, Helsinki 49-124
58. Sukachev V.N., and Dylis N. Fundamentals of Forest Biogeocoenology (1964), Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh
59. Tamm C.O. Nitrogen in terrestrial ecosystems. Questions of productivity, vegetational changes and ecosystem stability. Ecol. Stud. 81 (1991) 1-115
60. Tamminen, P., Mälkönen, E. (Eds.), 1999. Näytteenotto metsämaan ominaisuuksien määrittämistä varten. The Finnish Forest Research Institute, Research Papers 729, pp. 1-54.
61. Ter Braak C.J.F. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67 3 (1986) 1167-1179
62. Ter Braak C.J.F. The analysis of vegetation-environment relationships by canonical correspondence analysis. Vegetation 64 (1987) 69-77
63. Trass H., and Malmer N. North European approaches to classification. In: Whittaker R.H. (Ed). Classification of Plant Communities (1978) 201-246
64. In: Ulvinen T., Syrjänen K., and Anttila S. (Eds). Suomen Sammalet (Bryophytes of Finland: Distribution, Ecology and Red list status). The Finnish Environment 560 (2002), Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki (In Finnish with English summary)
65. Vellak K., Paal J., and Liira J. Diversity and distribution pattern of bryophytes and vascular plants in a boreal spruce forest. Silva Fenn. 37 1 (2003) 3-13
66. Vitikainen O., Ahti T., Kuusinen M., Lommi S., and Ulvinen T. Preliminary checklist of lichens and allied fungi of Finland. Norrlinia 6 (1997) 1-123
67. Waring R.H., and Major J. Some vegetation of the California coastal redwood region in relation to gradients of moisture, nutrients, light, and temperature. Ecol. Monogr. 34 (1964) 167-215
68. Whittaker, R.H., 1956. Vegetation of the great smoky mountains. Ecol. Monogr. 26 (1) 1-80.
69. Wikum D.A., and Wali M.K. Analysis of a North Dacota Gallery forest: vegetation in relation to topographic and soil gradients. Ecol. Monogr. 44 (1974) 441-464