Exploring 'quality': Research participants' perspectives on verbatim quotations

International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 97-110

  Corden, Anne ^a   Sainsbury, Roy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646906623     PISSN: 13645579     EISSN: 14645300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13645570600595264     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Alasuutari, P. (1995). Researching culture: Qualitative method and cultural studies. London: Sage.
2. Backett-Milburn, K., Meuthner, N., & Parry, O. (1999). The importance of the conditions and relations of project design. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 2(4), 297-312.
3. Beck, C. T. (1993). Qualitative research: The evaluation of its credibility, fittingness and auditability. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 15(2), 263-266.
4. Beresford, P., Green, D., Lister, R., & Woodward, K. (1999). Poverty first hand: Poor people speak for themselves. London: Child Poverty Action Group.
5. Bogdan, G., & Taylor, S. J. (1975). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A phenomenological approach to the social sciences. New York: John Wiley.
6. Corden, A., & Sainsbury, R. (2005a). Volunteering for employment skills: A qualitative research study. York: Social Policy Research Unit, University of York.
7. Corden, A., & Sainsbury, R. (2005b). Research participants' views on use of verbatim quotations. York: Social Policy Research Unit, University of York.
8. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.) (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Greenhalgh, T., & Taylor, R. (1997). How to read a paper: Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research). British Medical Journal, 315, 740-743.
10. Hammersley, M. (1992). What's wrong with ethnography? London: Routledge.
11. Holloway, I., & Wheeler, S. (1996). Qualitative research in nursing. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
12. Hughes, J., & Sharrock, W. (1997). The philosophy of social research. London: Longman.
13. Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Long, A. F., & Godfrey, M. (2004). An evaluation tool to assess the quality of qualitative research studies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 7(2), 181-196.
15. Mason, J. (1996). Qualitative researching. London: Sage.
16. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17. Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In A. Bryman & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 173-194). London: Routledge.
18. Ritchie, J., Spencer, L., & O'Connor, W. (2003). Carrying out qualitative analysis. In J. Ritchie & J. Lewis (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage.
19. Sandelowski, M. (2003). Tables or tableaux? The challenges of writing and reading mixed methods studies. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research (pp. 321-350). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Scale, C. (1999). The quality of qualitative research. London: Sage.
21. Spencer, L., Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., & Dillon, L. (2003). Quality in qualitative evaluation: A framework for assessing research evidence. London: Cabinet Office.
22. White, C., Woodfield, K., & Ritchie, J. (2003). Reporting and presenting qualitative data. In J. Ritchie & J. Lewis (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (pp. 287-320). London: Sage.
23. Wiles, R., Charles, V., Crow, G., & Heath, S. (2006, forthcoming). Informed consent and the research process: following rules or striking balences. Sociological Research. Online http://www.socreson-line.org.uk/