Predation risk effects on fitness related measures in a resident bird

Oikos

Volumn 113, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 325-333

  Thomson, Robert L ^a   Forsman, Jukka T ^b   Mönkkönen, Mikko ^c   Hukkanen, Markku ^a   Koivula, Kari ^a   Rytkönen, Seppo ^a   Orell, Markku ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; BIRD; BREEDING; DEMOGRAPHY; HABITAT; LANDSCAPE; NESTLING; PREDATION RISK; REPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOR;

AVES; PARUS MONTANUS; SALIX;

EID: 33646883510     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14376.x     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Adriaensen F. Dhondt A. A. Van Dongen S. et al. 1998. Stabilising selection on blue tit fledgling mass in presence of sparrowhawks Proc. R. Soc. B 265 : 1011 1016.
2. Bogliani G. Sergio F. Tavecchia G.. 1999. Woodpigeons nesting in association with hobby falcons: advantages and choice rules Anim. Behav. 57 : 125 131.
3. Brotons L. Broggi J.. 2003. Influence of morphology on winter residence and recruitment in juvenile coal tits (Parus ater) after the post-fledging period Ecoscience 10 : 273 282.
4. Blank S. Seiter C. Bruce P.. 2001. Resampling stats in Excel. Resampling Stats, Arlington, Virginia.
5. Burke S.. 2001. Missing values, robust statistics and non-parametric methods. Statistics and data analysis LC·GC Europe online supplement 59 : 19 24.
6. Cooper H. Hedges L. V.. 1994. The handbook of research synthesis. Russel Sage Foundation.
7. Crowder L. B. Cooper W. E.. 1982. Habitat structural complexity and the interaction between bluegills and their prey Ecology 63 : 1802 1813.
8. Dhondt A. A. Kempenaers B. Clobert J.. 1998. Sparrowhawk predation and blue tit adult annual survival rate Ibis 140 : 580 584.
9. Forsman J. T. Mönkkönen M.. 2001. Responses by breeding birds to heterospecific song and mobbing call playbacks under varying predation risk Anim. Behav. 62 : 1067 1073.
10. Forsman J. T. Mönkkönen M. Helle P. et al. 1998a. Heterospecific attraction and food resources in migrants' breeding patch selection in northern boreal forest Oecologia 115 : 278 286.
11. Forsman J. T. Mönkkönen M. Inkeröinen J. et al. 1998b. Aggregate dispersion of birds after encountering a predator: experimental evidence J. Avian Biol. 29 : 44 48.
12. Forsman J. T. Mönkkönen M. Hukkanen M.. 2001. Effects of predation on community assembly and spatial dispersion of breeding forest birds Ecology 82 : 232 244.
13. Forsman J. T. Seppänen J-T. Mönkkönen M.. 2002. Positive fitness consequences of interspecific interaction with a potential competitor Proc. R. Soc. B 269 : 1619 1623.
14. Geer T. A.. 1978. Effects of sparrowhawks on nesting tits Condor 80 : 419 423.
15. Geer T. A.. 1982. The selection of tits Parus spp. by sparrowhawks Accipiter nisus Ibis 124 : 159 167.
16. Gilinsky E.. 1984. The role of fish predation and spatial heterogeneity in determining benthic community structure Ecology 65 : 455 468.
17. Götmark F.. 2002. Predation by sparrowhawks favours early breeding and small broods in great tits Oecologia 130 : 25 32.
18. Gurevitch J. Hedges L. V.. 1993. Meta-analysis: combining the results of independent experiments Scheiner S. Gurevitch J. Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Chapman and Hall 378 398.
19. Hromada M. Tryjanowski P. Antczak M.. 2002. Presence of the great grey shrike Lanius excubitor affects breeding passerine assemblage Ann. Zool. Fenn. 39 : 125 130.
20. Jȩdrzejewska B. J e ȩ drzejewski W.. 1993. Summer food of the pygmy owl Glaucidium passerinum in Bialowieza National park, Poland Ornis Fenn. 70 : 196 201.
21. Koivula K. Orell M. Rytkönen S.. 1996. Winter survival and breeding success of dominant and subordinate willow tits Parus montanus Ibis 138 : 624 629.
22. Korpimäki, E. 1981. On the ecology and biology of Tengmalm's owl (Aegolius funereus) in southern ostrobothnia and suomenselkä, western Finland. - PhD thesis, Univ. of Oulu.
23. Kotler B. P. Blaustein L. Brown J. S.. 1992. Predator facilitation: the combined effect of snakes and owls on the foraging behavior of gerbils Ann. Zool. Fenn. 29 : 199 206.
24. Kullberg C.. 1995. Strategy of the pygmy owl while hunting avian and mammalian prey Ornis Fenn. 72 : 72 78.
25. Lahti K. Koivula K. Orell M. et al. 1996. Social dominance in free-living willow tits Parus montanus: determinants and some implications of hierarchy Ibis 138 : 539 544.
26. Lewis D. B. Eby L. A.. 2002. Spatially heterogeneous refugia and predation risk in intertidal salt marshes Oikos 96 : 119 129.
27. Lima S. L.. 1992. Life in a multi-predator environment: some considerations for anti-predatory vigilance Ann. Zool. Fenn. 29 : 217 226.
28. Lima S. L.. 1998a. Non-lethal effects in the ecology of predator-prey interactions Bioscience 48 : 25 34.
29. Lima S. L.. 1998b. Stress and decision making under the risk of predation: recent developments from behavioural, reproductive, and ecological perspectives Adv. Study Behav. 27 : 215 290.
30. Lindström J.. 1999. Early development and fitness in birds and mammals Trends Ecol. Evol. 14 : 343 347.
31. Marquiss M. Newton I.. 1982. Habitat preference in male and female sparrowhawks Accipiter nisus Ibis 124 : 324 328.
32. Meese R. J. Fuller M. R.. 1989. Distribution and behaviour of passerines around peregrine (Falco peregrinus) eyries of western Greenland Ibis 131 : 27 32.
33. Merilä J.. 1997. Expression of genetic variation in body size of the collared flycatcher under different environmental conditions Evolution 51 : 526 536.
34. Mönkkönen M. Helle P. Soppela K.. 1990. Numerical and behavioural responses of migrant passerines to experimental manipulation of resident tits (Parus spp.): heterospecific attraction in northern breeding bird communities? Oecologia 85 : 218 225.
35. Mönkkönen M. Härdling R. Forsman J. T. et al. 1999. Evolution of heterospecific attraction: using other species as cues in habitat selection Evol. Ecol. 13 : 91 104.
36. Mönkkönen M. Tornberg R. Väisänen P.. 2000. Kanahaukka voi vähentää lintujen pesiin kohdistuvaa saalistusta suomalaisissa metsämaisemissa Suomen Riista 46 : 27 36 (in Finnish with English summary).
37. Morse D. H.. 1977. Feeding behaviour and predator avoidance in heterospecific groups Bioscience 27 : 332 339.
38. Müller J. W.. 2000. Possible advantages of a robust evaluation of comparisons J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 105 : 551 555.
39. Newton I.. 1986. The sparrowhawk. Poyser, Calton.
40. Nilsson J.-Å. Gårdmark A.. 2001. Sibling competition affects individual growth strategies in marsh tit, Parus palustris, nestlings Anim. Behav. 61 : 357 365.
41. Norrdahl K. Korpimäki E.. 1998. Fear in farmlands: how much does predator avoidance affect bird community structure? J. Avian Biol. 29 : 79 85.
42. Norrdahl K. Suhonen J. Hemminki O. et al. 1995. Predator presence may benefit: kestrels protect curlew nests against nest predators Oecologia 101 : 105 109.
43. Orell M. Ojanen M.. 1983. Breeding biology and population dynamics of the willow tit (Parus montanus) Ann. Zool. Fenn. 20 : 90 114.
44. Orell M. Koivula K.. 1988. Cost of reproduction: parental survival and production of recruits in the willow tit Parus montanus Oecologia 77 : 423 432.
45. Orell M. Lahti K. Koivula K. et al. 1999. Immigration and gene flow in a northern willow tit (Parus montanus) population J. Evol. Biol. 12 : 283 295.
46. Persson L. Eklöv P.. 1995. Prey refuges affecting interactions between piscivorous perch and juvenile perch and roach Ecology 76 : 70 81.
47. Quinn J. L. Prop J. Kokorev Y. et al. 2003. Predator protection or similar habitat selection in red-breasted goose nesting associations: extremes along a continuum Anim. Behav. 65 : 297 307.
48. Roos S. Pärt T.. 2004. Nest predators affect spatial dynamics of breeding red-backed shrikes (Lanius collurio) J. Anim. Ecol. 73 : 117 127.
49. Rosenberg M. S. Adams D. C. Gurevitch J.. 1997. MetaWin. Statistical software for meta-analysis and resampling tests. Version 2.0. Sinauer Associates.
50. Rytkönen S. Soppela M.. 1995. Vicinity of sparrowhawk nest affects willow tit nest defense Condor 97 : 1074 1078.
51. Rytkönen S. Kuokkanen P. Hukkanen M. et al. 1998. Prey selection by sparrowhawks Accipiter nisus and characteristics of vulnerable prey Ornis Fenn. 75 : 77 87.
52. Sasvári L. Hegyi Z.. 1998. Bird predation by tawny owl (Strix aluco L.) and its effect on the reproductive performance of tits Acta Oecol. 19 : 483 490.
53. Scheiner S. M.. 2001. Theories, hypotheses, and statistics Scheiner S. M. Gurevitch J. Design and analysis of ecological experiments, 2nd ed. Oxford Univ. Press 3 13.
54. Selås V. Rafoss T.. 1999. Ranging behaviour and foraging habits of breeding sparrowhawks Accipiter nisus in a continuous forested area in Norway Ibis 141 : 269 276.
55. Seppänen J.-T. Mönkkönen M. Forsman J. T.. 2005. Presence of other species may counter seasonal decline in breeding success - a field experiment J. Avian Biol. 36 : 380 385.
56. Sodhi N. S. Didiuk A. Oliphant L. W.. 1990. Differences in bird abundance in relation to proximity of merlin nests Can. J. Zool. 68 : 852 854.
57. Suhonen J. Norrdahl K. Korpimäki E.. 1994. Avian predation risk modifies breeding bird community on a farmland area Ecology 75 : 1626 1634.
58. Thomson R. L. Forsman J. T. Mönkkönen M.. 2003. Positive interactions between migrant and resident birds: testing the heterospecific attraction hypothesis Oecologia 134 : 431 438.
59. Thomson, R. L., Forsman, J. T., Sardà-Palomera, F. et al. 2006. Fear factor: prey habitat selection and its consequences in a predation risk landscape. - Ecography, in press.
60. Ueta M.. 2001. Azure-winged magpies avoid nest predation by breeding synchronously with Japanese lesser sparrowhawks Anim. Behav. 61 : 1007 1012.
61. Whittingham M. J. Evans K. L.. 2004. The effects of habitat structure on predation risk of birds in agricultural landscapes Ibis 146 : 210 220.