Preferences for environmental issues among environmentally-concerned citizens in six countries

Environmental Conservation

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 288-293

  Seip, Knut Lehre ^a   Cobelas, Miguel Alvarez ^b   Doledec, Sylvain ^c   Fang, Jinghua ^d   Smith, Val H ^e   Vorontsova, Olga S ^f  

^a OSLO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (Norway)

^b CSIC   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^d TAIYUAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^e UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^f Center for International Relations   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Benefit transfer; Comparative study; Environment; Pairwise comparison; Pollution; Preferences; Species right

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; POLLUTION CONTROL; RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES; STATISTICS;

BENEFIT TRANSFER; COMPARATIVE STUDY; PAIRWISE COMPARISON; PREFERENCES; SPECIES RIGHT;

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION;

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUE; LEGISLATION; PREDATOR; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

ARTICLE; CHINA; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ENVIRONMENT; FRANCE; LAW; POLLUTION; RUSSIAN FEDERATION; SPAIN; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

ASIA; CHINA; EURASIA; EUROPE; FAR EAST; FRANCE; NORTH AMERICA; NORTHERN EUROPE; NORWAY; RUSSIAN FEDERATION; SCANDINAVIA; SOUTHERN EUROPE; SPAIN; UNITED STATES; WESTERN EUROPE;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 33646875476     PISSN: 03768929     EISSN: 14694387     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0376892906002578     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Andreoni, J. & Levinson, A. (2001) The simple analytics of the environmental Kuznets curve. Journal of Public Economics 80: 269-286.
2. Ayers, R.H. (1986) Christian realism and environmental ethics. Religion and Environmental Crisis, by E.C. Hargrove, pp. 154-170. Athens, GA, USA: University of Georgia Press.
3. Bockstael, N.E., Freeman III, A.M., Kopp, R.J., Portney, P.R. & Smith, V.K. (2000) On measuring economic values for nature. Environmental Science and Technology 34: 1384-1389.
4. Brennan, A. (2002) Environmental Ethics. Stanford, CA, USA: Stanford University Press.
5. Bullock, C.H. (1999) Environmental and strategic uncertainty in common property management: the case of the Scottish red deer. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 42(2): 235-252.
6. Buschena, D., Anderson, T. & Leonard, J.L. (2001) Valuing non-market goods: the case of elk permit lotteries. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 41: 33-43.
7. Callicott, J.B., Crowder, B.L. & Mumford, K. (2000) Normative concepts in conservation biology: reply to Willers and Hunter. Conservation Biology 14(2): 575-578.
8. Cameron, T.A. & Englin, J. (1997) Respondents experience and contingent valuation of environmental goods. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 33: 297-313.
9. Czeh, B. & Krausman, P.R. (1997) Distribution and causation of species endangerment in the United States. Science 277: 1116.
10. Frankenhauser, S., Tol, R.S.J. & Pearce, D.W. (1997) The aggregation of climate change damages: a welfare theoretical approach. Environmental and Resource Economics 10: 249-266.
11. Gifford, R. (1996) Environmental Psychology. Principles and Practice. Boston, USA: Allyn and Bacon.
12. Guilford, J.P. (1954) Psychometric Methods. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
13. Keeney, R.H. & McDaniels, T.L. (2001) A framework to guided thinking and analysis regarding climate change policies. Risk Analysis 21(6): 989-1000.
14. Keeney, R.L. (1992) Value Focused Thinking. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.
15. Keeney, R.L. & Raiffa, H. (1976) Decisions with Multiple Objectives. New York, USA: Wiley.
16. Kenyon, W. & Edwards-Jones, G. (1998) What level of information enables the public to act like experts when evaluating ecological goods? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 41(4): 463-475.
17. Le Nouvel Observateur (2001) Atlas Economique Mondial 2001. Paris, France: Atlaséco.
18. Leopold, A. (1949) A Sand County Almanac. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
19. Loomis, J.B. (1992) The evolution of a more rigorous approach to benefit transfer: benefit function transfer. Water Resources Research 28(3): 701-705.
20. Miller, G. (1956) The magical number seven plus minus two. Physiological Review 63: 81-97.
21. Ready, R., Navrud, S., Day, B., Duborg, R., Machado, F., Mourato, S., Spanninks, F. & Rodrigues, M.X.V. (2004) Benefit transfer in Europe: how reliable are transfers between countries? Environmental and Resource Economics 29: 67-82.
22. Schläper, F. & Hanley, N. (2003) Do local landscape patterns affect the demand for landscape amenities protection? Journal of Agricultural Economics 54(1): 21-35.
23. Selden, T.M. & Song, D. (1995) Neoclassical growth, the J curve for abatement, and the inverted U curve for pollution. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29: 162-168.
24. Sharifi, M.A., van den Toorn, W., Rico, A. & Emmanuel, M. (2002) Application of GIS and multicriteria evaluation in locating sustainable boundary between the Tunari National Park and Cochabamba city (Bolivia). Journal of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis 11: 151-164.
25. Siegel, S., Castellan, J. & John, N. (1988) Nonparametric Statistics for Behavioural Sciences. New York, USA: McGraw Hill.
26. Wackernagel, M., Lewan, M.L. & Hansson, C.B. (1999) Evaluating the use of natural capital with ecological footprint. Applications in Sweden and subregions. Ambio 28: 604-611.
27. Walas, T., ed. (1995) Stereotypes and Nations. Krakow, Poland: International cultural center, Kraków.