Empirical Analysis of the Reliability and Validity of Balanced Scorecard Measures and Dimensions

Advances in Management Accounting

Volumn 15, Issue , 2006, Pages 127-142

  Boulianne, Emilio ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646843748     PISSN: 14747871     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S1474-7871(06)15006-6     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Banker R.D., Potter G., and Srinivasan D. An empirical investigation of an incentive plan that includes nonfinancial performance measures. The Accounting Review 75 (2000) 65-92
2. Blum M.L., and Naylor J.C. Industrial psychology (1968), Harper & Row, New York, NY
3. Brownell P. Research methods in management accounting (Monograph no. 2) (1995), Coopers & Lybrand Accounting Research Methodology, Australia and New Zealand
4. Brownell P., and Dunk A.S. Task uncertainty and its interaction with budgetary participation and budget emphasis: Some methodological issues and empirical investigation. Accounting Organization and Society 16 8 (1991) 693-703
5. Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In: M. D. Dunnette, L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, 2nd ed., pp. 687-732). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
6. Chenhall R.H. Management control systems design within its organizational context: Findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organization, and Society 28 (2003) 127-168
7. Chenhall R.H., and Langfield-Smith K. The relationship between strategic priorities, management techniques and management accounting: An empirical investigation using a system approach. Accounting Organization and Society 23 3 (1998) 243-264
8. Chow C.W., Haddad K.M., and Williamson J.E. Applying the balanced scorecard to small companies. Management Accounting 79 2 (1997) 21-27
9. Churchill G.A. A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research 16 1 (1979) 64-73
10. Dilla W., and Steinbart P. Relative weighting of common and unique balanced scorecard measures by knowledge decision makers. Behavioral Research in Accounting 17 (2005) 43-53
11. Fitzgerald L., Johnston R., Brignall S., Silvestro R., and Voss C. Performance measurement in service businesses (1991), CIMA, London, UK
12. Heneman R.L. The relationship between supervisory ratings and results-oriented measures of performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology 39 4 (1986) 811-826
13. Hoque Z., and James W. Linking balanced scorecard measures to size and market factors: Impact on organizational performance. Journal of Management Accounting Research 12 (2000) 1-17
14. Ittner C.D., and Larcker D.F. Innovations in performance measurement: Trends and research implications. Journal of Management Accounting Research 10 (1998) 205-238
15. Ittner C.D., and Larcker D.F. Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting: A value based management perspective. Journal of Accounting and Economics 32 (2001) 349-410
16. Ittner, C. D., Larcker, D. F., Meyer, M. W. (1997). Performance, compensation, and the balanced scorecard. Working Paper, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
17. Ittner C.D., Larcker D.F., and Meyer M.W. Subjectivity and the weighting of performance measures: Evidence from a balanced scorecard. The Accounting Review 78 3 (2003) 725-758
18. Kaplan R.S., and Atkinson A.A. Advanced management accounting. 3rd ed (1998), Prentice Hall, New Jersey, NY
19. Kaplan R.S., and Norton D.P. The balanced scorecard - measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review 70 1 (1992) 71-79
20. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 322 pages.
21. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). The strategy-focused organization: How balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 400 pages.
22. Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Wilson, 667 pages.
23. Lingle J.H., and Schiemann W.A. From balanced scorecard to strategic gauges: Is measurement worth it. Management Review 85 3 (1996) 56-61
24. Lipe M.G., and Salterio S.E. The balanced scorecard: Judgmental effects of common and unique performance measures. The Accounting Review 75 3 (2000) 283-298
25. Lipe M.G., and Salterio S.E. A note on the judgmental effects of the balanced scorecard's information organization. Accounting, Organization and Society 27 (2002) 531-540
26. Lynch R.L., and Cross K.F. Measure up! Yardsticks for continuous improvements (1991), Blackwell, Cambridge, MA
27. Malina M.A., and Selto F.H. Communicating and controlling strategy: An empirical study of the effectiveness of the balanced scorecard. Journal of Management Accounting Research 13 (2001) 47-90
28. Nunnally, J. (1967). Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill Books, 640 Pages.
29. Peter J.P. Reliability: A review of psychometric basics and recent marketing practices. Journal of Marketing Research 16 1 (1979) 6-17
30. Reck J.L. The usefulness of financial and nonfinancial performance information in resource allocation decisions. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 20 (2001) 45-71
31. Simons R. Performance measurement and control systems for implementing strategy (2000), Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
32. Ullrich M.J., and Tuttle B.M. The effects of comprehensive information reporting systems and economic incentives on managers' time-planning decisions. Behavioral Research in Accounting 16 (2004) 89-105