The appropriation of the results of innovative activity

International Journal of Technology Management

Volumn 35, Issue 1-4, 2006, Pages 107-135

  Galende, Jesús ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALAMANCA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Innovative process; Knowledge protection; Mechanisms for appropriating the results; Patents

Indexed keywords

COSTS; INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PATENTS AND INVENTIONS; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS;

COMPLEMENTARY RESOURCES; INNOVATIVE PROCESS; KNOWLEDGE PROTECTION; MECHANISMS FOR APPROPRIATING THE RESULTS;

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

EID: 33646843234     PISSN: 02675730     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/IJTM.2006.009231     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Amit, R. and Shoemaker, P.J.H. (1993) 'Strategic assets and organizational rent', Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, pp.33-46.
2. Arrow, K. (1962) 'Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention', in R.R. Nelson (Ed). The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, Princenton, NJ: Princenton University Press, pp.609-625.
3. Arundel, A. (2001) 'The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation', Research Policy, Vol. 30, pp.611-624.
4. Barney, J.B. (1991) 'Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage', Journal of Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp.99-120.
5. Basberg, B.L. (1987) 'Patents and the measurement of technological change: a survey of the literature', Research Policy, Vol. 16, pp.131-141.
6. Beise, M. and Stahl, H. (1999) 'Public research and industrial innovations in Germany', Research Policy, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp.397-422.
7. Bernstein, J. (1989) 'The structure of Canadian interindustry R&D spillovers, and the rates of return to R&D', Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp.315-328.
8. Brouwer, E. and Kleinknecht, A. (1999) 'Innovative output, and a firm's propensity to patent: an exploration of CIS micro data', Research Policy, Vol. 28, pp.615-624.
9. Bughin, J. and Jacques, J.M. (1994) 'Managerial efficiency and the Schumpeterian link between size, market structure and innovation revisited', Research Policy, Vol. 23, No. 6, pp.653-659.
10. Cefis, E. and Orsenigo, L. (2001) 'The persistence of innovative activities: a cross-countries and cross-sectors comparative analysis', Research Policy, Vol. 30, pp.1139-1158.
11. Cohen, W., Goto, A., Nagata, A., Nelson, R. and Walsh, J. (2002) 'R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States', Research Policy, Vol. 31, pp.1349-1367.
12. Cohen, W. and Levin, R. (1989) 'Empirical studies of innovation and market structure', in R. Schmalensee and R.D. Willing (Eds). Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 2, North-Holland, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, pp.1059-1107.
13. Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D. (1989) 'Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D: implications for the analysis of R&D investment', Economic Journal, Vol. 99, pp.569-596.
14. Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D. (1990) 'Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation', Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp.128-152.
15. Collinson, S. (1999) 'Knowledge Management capabilities for steel makers: a British-Japanese corporate alliance for organizational learning', Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, Vol. 11, pp.337-358.
16. Coombs, R., Narandren, P. and Richards, A. (1996) 'A literature-based innovation output indicator', Research Policy, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp.403-413.
17. Dierickx, I. and Cool, K. (1989) 'Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage', Management Science, Vol. 35, No. 12, pp.1504-1511.
18. Dodgson, M. (1993) 'Learning, trust, and technological collaboration', Human Relations, Vol. 46, pp.77-95.
19. Dodgson, M. (1994) 'Technological collaboration and innovation', in M. Dodgson and R. Rothwell (Eds). The Handbook of Industrial Innovation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.285-292.
20. Dosi, G. (1988) 'Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation', Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 26, pp.1120-1171.
21. Dyerson, R. and Mueller, F.U. (1999) 'Learning, teamwork and appropriability: managing technological change in the department of social security', Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 36, No. 5, pp.629-652.
22. Galende, J. and Suárez, I. (1999) 'A resource-based analysis of the factors determining a firm's R&D activities', Research Policy, Vol. 28, pp.891-905.
23. Garud, R. and Nayyar, P. (1994) 'Transformative capacity: continual structuring by intertemporal technology transfer', Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 15, pp.365-385.
24. Geroski, P. (1995) 'Markets for technology: knowledge, innovation and appropriability', in P. Stoneman (Ed). Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, Oxford: Blackwell, pp.90-131.
25. Gopalakrishnan, S. and Bierly, P. (2001) 'Analyzing innovation adoption using a knowledge-based approach', Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol. 18, pp.107-130.
26. Grant, R.M. (1991) 'The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation', California Management Review, Vol. 33, pp.114-135.
27. Gumbau, M. (1997) 'Análisis microeconómico de los déterminantes de la innovación: aplicación a las empresas industrials españolas', Revista Española de Economía, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp.41-66.
28. Hagedoorn, J. (1993) 'Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences', Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp.371-385.
29. Harabi, N. (1995) 'Appropriability of technical innovations: an empirical analysis', Research Policy, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp.981-992.
30. Helfat, C.E. (1994) 'Evolutionary trajectories in petroleum firm R&D', Management Science, Vol. 40, No. 12, pp.1720-1747.
31. Henderson, R. and Cockburn, I. (1996) 'Scale, scope, and spillovers: the determinants of research productivity in drug discovery', Rand Journal of Economics, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp.32-59.
32. Hislop, D. (2003) 'Knowledge integration processes and the appropriation of innovations', European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp.159-172.
33. Hoegl, M. and Proserpio, L. (2004) 'Team member proximity and teamwork in innovative projects', Research Policy, Vol. 33, No. 8, pp.1153-1165.
34. Kingston, W. (2001) 'Innovation needs patents reform', Research Policy, Vol. 30, pp.403-423.
35. Levin, R. (1988) 'Appropriability, R&D spending, and technological performance', American Economic Review, Vol. 78, No. 2, pp.424-428.
36. Levin, R., Cohen, W. and Mowery, D. (1985) 'R&D appropriability, opportunity, and market structure: new evidence on some Shumpeterian hypotheses', American Economic Review, Vol. 75, No. 2, pp.20-24.
37. Levin, R., Klevorick, A., Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (1987) 'Appropriating the returns from industrial R&D', Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Special Issue, Vol. 3, pp.783-820.
38. Mansfield, E. (1985) 'How rapidly does new industrial technology leak out?', Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 34, No. 2, Diciembre, pp.217-223.
39. Mansfield, E. (1986a) 'Patents and innovations: an empirical study', Management Science, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp.173-181.
40. Mansfield, E. (1986b) 'The R&D tax credit and other technology policy issues', American Economic Review, Vol. 76, No. 2, pp.190-194.
41. Mansfield, E. (1991) 'Academic research and industrial innovation', Research Policy, Vol. 20, pp.1-12.
42. Mansfield, E., Schwartz, M. and Wagner, S. (1981) 'Imitation costs and patents: an empirical study', The Economic Journal, Vol. 91, pp.907-918.
43. McMillan, G., Narin, F. and Deeds, D. (2000) 'An analysis of the critical role of public science in innovation: the case of biotechnology', Research Policy, Vol. 29, pp.1-8.
44. Mowery, D.C., Oxley, J.E. and Silverman, B.S. (1996) 'Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer', Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue, Vol. 17, pp.77-91.
45. Nelson, R.R. (1959) 'The simple economics of basic scientific research', Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 67, pp.297-306.
46. Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47. Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995) The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics for Innovation, NY: Oxford University Press.
48. Norman, P.M. (2002) 'Protecting knowledge in strategic alliances: resource and relational characteristics', The Journal of High Technology Management Research, Vol. 13, pp. 177-202.
49. OECD (1997) OECD Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data - Oslo Manual, Paris: OECD Publications Service.
50. OECD (2002) OECD Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development - Frascati Manual, Paris: OECD Publications Service.
51. Pavitt, K. (1984) 'Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory', Research Policy, Vol. 13, No. 6, pp.343-373.
52. Pavitt, K. (1987) 'The objectives of technology policy', Science and Public Policy, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp.182-188.
53. Peteraf, M.A. (1993) 'The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view', Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp.179-191.
54. Polanyi, M. (1962) Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
55. Reed, R. and DeFillippi, R.J. (1990) 'Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage', Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 15, pp.88-102.
56. Rosenberg, N. (1976) Perspectives on Technology, NY: Cambridge University Press.
57. Rothaermel, F.T. (2001) 'Complementary assets, strategic alliances, and the incumbent's advantage: an empirical study of industry and firm effects in the biopharmaceutical industry', Research Policy, Vol. 30, pp.1235-1251.
58. Sahal, D. (1979) 'A theory of evolution of technology', International Journal of Systems Science, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp.259-274.
59. Santoro, M.D. and Chakrabarti, A.K. (2002) 'Firm size and technology centrality in industry-university interactions', Research Policy, Vol. 31, No. 7, pp.1163-1180.
60. Stadler, M. (1992) 'Determinants of innovative activity in oligopolistic markets', Journal of Economics, Vol. 56, No. 2, pp.137-156.
61. Stock, G.N. and McDermatt, C.M. (2001) 'Organizational and strategic predictors of manufacturing technology implementation success: an exploratory study', Technovation, Vol. 21, No. 10, pp.625-636.
62. Storper, M. (1995) 'Regional technology coalitions, an essential dimension of national technology policy', Research Policy, Vol. 24, No. 6, pp.895-911.
63. Teece, D. (1987) 'Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and public policy', in D. Teece (Eds). The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal, NY: Harper and Row, pp.185-219.
64. Teece, D. (1988) 'Capturing value from technological innovation: integration, strategic partnering, and licensing decisions', Interfaces, Vol. 18, No. 3.
65. Teece, D. (1998) 'Design issues for innovative firms: bureaucracy, incentives and industrial structure', in A.D. Chandler, P. Hogström and O. Sölvell (Eds). The Dinamic Firm: The Role of Technology Strategy, Organization and Regions, NY: Oxford University Press.
66. Teece, D., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997) 'Dinamic capabilities and strategic management', Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, No. 7, pp.509-533.
67. Tripsas, M., Schrader, S. and Sobrero, M. (1995) 'Discouraging opportunistic behavior in collaborative R&D: a new role for government', Research Policy, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp.367-389.
68. Verona, G. and Ravasi, D. (2003) 'Unbundling dynamic capabilities: an exploratory study of continuous product innovation', Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp.577-606.
69. Veugelers, R. and Cassiman, B. (1999) 'Make and buy in innovation strategies: evidence from Belgian manufacturing firms', Research Policy, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp.63-80.
70. Von Hippel, E. (1988) The Sources of Innovation, NY: Oxford University Press.
71. Wernerfelt, B. (1984) 'A resource-based view of the firm', Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 5, pp.171-180.
72. West, J. and Iansiti, M. (2003) 'Experience, experimentation, and the accumulation of knowledge: the evolution of R&D in the semiconductor industry', Research Policy, Vol. 32, pp.809-825.
73. Winter, S. (1987) 'Knowledge and competence as strategic assets', in D. Teece (Ed). The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal, NY: Harper and Row, pp.159-184.