Neo-speciesism

Journal of Social Philosophy

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 380-390

  Bernstein, Mark ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL RIGHTS; ARTICLE; BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS; HUMAN; PERSONHOOD; PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACH; PHILOSOPHY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS; PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACH;

ANIMAL RIGHTS; ANIMALS; HUMANS; PERSONHOOD; PHILOSOPHY; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33646839776     PISSN: 00472786     EISSN: 14679833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9833.2004.00239.x     Document Type: Review

References (8)

1. Two book-length treatments of the marginal case arguments are Daniel Dombrowski's Babies and Beasts: The Argument from Marginal Cases (Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1997)
2. and Evelyn Pluhar's Beyond Prejudice: The Moral Significance of Human and Nonhuman Animals (Durham: Duke University Press, 1995).
3. My "Marginal Cases and Moral Relevance", Journal of Social Philosophy 33, no. 4(Winter 2002):523-39, attempts to forward the debate by introducing a different line of thought.
4. This definition is given by Jennifer Welchman in "Xenografting, Species Loyalty, and Human Solidarity", Journal of Social Philosophy 34, no. 2(Summer 2003):246.
5. I discuss this in greater detail in "Speciesism and Loyalty", Behavior and Philosophy 19, no. 1(Spring/Summer 1991):50ff.
6. Welchman, "Xenografting, Species Loyalty, and Human Solidarity", 248-9.
7. see Richard Double, "Morality, Impartiality, and What We Can Ask of Persons", American Philosophical Quarterly. 36, no. 2(April 1999):149-58.
8. See, e.g., Robert Nozick, Anarchy, State, and Utopia (New York: Basic Books, 1974), 159.