A novel technique using preformed metal crowns for managing carious primary molars in general practice - A retrospective analysis

British Dental Journal

Volumn 200, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 451-454

  Innes, N P T ^a   Stirrups, D R ^b   Evans, D J P ^b   Hall, N ^c   Leggate, M ^d  

^a CSO   (United Kingdom)

^b DUNDEE DENTAL HOSPITAL AND SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^c Dental Surgery   (South Africa)

^d NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646829107     PISSN: 00070610     EISSN: 17417503     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4813466     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Qvist V, Laurberg L, Poulsen A, Teglers P T. Longevity and cariostatic effects of everyday conventional glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth: three-year results. J Dent Res 1997; 76: 1387-1396.
2. Welbury R R, Walls A W, Murray J J, McCabe J F. The 5-year results of a clinical trial comparing a glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement restoration with an amalgam restoration. Br Dent J 1991; 170: 177-181.
3. Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C et al. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite. Am J Dent 2001; 14: 148-152.
4. Duggal M S, Toumba K J, Sharma N K. Clinical performance of a compomer and amalgam for the interproximal restoration of primary molars: a 24-month evaluation. Br Dent J 2002; 193: 339-342.
5. Gross L C, Griffen A L, Casamassimo P S. Compomers as Class II restorations in primary molars. Ped Dent 2001; 23: 24-27.
6. Marks L A, Weerheijm K L, van Amerongen W E et al. Dyract versus Tytin Class II restorations in primary molars: 36 months evaluation. Caries Res 1999; 33: 387-392.
7. Roeters J J, Frankenmolen F, Burgersdijk R C W, Peters T C R. Clinical evaluation of Dyract in primary molars: 3-year results. Am J Dent 1998; 11: 143-148.
8. Welbury R R, Shaw A J, Murray J J et al. Clinical evaluation of paired compomer and glass ionomer restorations in primary molars: final results after 42 months. Br Dent J 2000; 189: 93-97.
9. Donly K J, Segura A, Kanellis M, Erickson R L. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1999; 130: 1459-1466.
10. Papagiannoulis L, Kakaboura A, Pantaleon F, Kavvadia K. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) in Class II restorations of primary teeth: a two-year follow-up study. Ped Dent 1999; 21: 231-234.
11. Tickle M K, Milsom K M, Kearney-Mitchell P et al. The fate of the carious primary teeth of children who regularly attend the general dental service.[comment]. Br Dent J 2002: 192: 219-223.
12. Levine R S, Pitts N B, Nugent Z J. The fate of 1,587 unrestored carious deciduous teeth: a retrospective general dental practice based study from northern England. [comment]. Br Dent J 2002; 193: 99-103.
13. Fayle S A, Welbury R R, Roberts J F. British Society of Paediatric Dentistry: a policy document on management of caries in the primary dentition. Int J Paed Dent 2001; 11: 153-157.
14. nd ed. pp 146-147. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
15. Randall R, Vrijhoef M, Wilson N. Efficacy of preformed metal crowns vs amalgam restorations in primary molars: a systematic review. JADA 2000; 131: 337-343.
16. Scottish Dental Practice Board Annual Report 2001/2002 Trinity Park House, Edinburgh.
17. Scotland's National Dental Inspection Programme 2003. http://www.dundee.ac.uk/ndip/index.htm.
18. O'Brien M. Children's dental health in the United Kingdom. London: HMSO, 1994.
19. Milsom K M, Tickle M, Blinkhorn AS. Dental pain and dental treatment of young children attending the general dental service. Br Dent J 2002; 192: 280-284.
20. Pitts N B, Nugent Z J, Smith P A. Scottish Health Boards Dental Epidemiological Programme. Report on 1997/1998 Survey of 5-year-old children. http://www.dundee.ac.uk/dhsru/shbdep97.
21. Kaplan E L, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations J Amer Stat Assoc 1958; 53: 457-481.
22. Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Nat Cancer Institute 1959; 21: 719-748.
23. Chadwick B, Dummer P, Dummer F et al. How long do fillings last? (reviewed by: Asbjorn Jokstad) Evidence Based Dent 2002; 3: 96-99.
24. McDonald S P, Sheiham A. A clinical comparison of non-traumatic methods of treating dental caries. Int Dent J 1994; 44: 465-470.
25. Farooq N S, Coll J A, Kuwabara A, Shelton P. Success rates of formocresol pulpotomy and indirect pulp therapy in the treatment of deep dentinal caries in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 2000; 22: 278-86.
26. Ribeiro CC, Baratieri LN, Perdigao J et al. A clinical, radiographic, and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of adhesive restorations on carious dentin in primary teeth. Quint Int 1999; 30: 591-599.
27. Foley J, Evans D J P, Blackwell A. Partial caries removal and cariostatic materials in carious primary molar teeth: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Br Dent J 2004; 197: 697-701.
28. Duggal M S, Nooh A, High A. Response of the primary pulp to inflammation: a review of the Leeds studies and challenges for the future. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2002; 3: 111-114.
29. Kidd E A M, Pitts N B. A reappraisal of the value of the bitewing radiograph in the diagnosis of posterior approximal caries. Br Dent J 1990; 169: 195-200.
30. Evans D J P, Southwick C A P, Foley JI et al. The Hall techniques pilot trial of a novel use of preformed metal crowns for managing carious primary teeth. 2000 http://www.scottishdental.org/pbrn/research/papers/rt03.htm