Crystal structure of a putative HTH-type transcriptional regulator yxaF from Bacillus subtilis

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 63, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 1087-1091

  Seetharaman, Jayaraman ^a   Kumaran, Desigan ^a   Bonanno, Jeffrey B ^b   Burley, Stephen K ^b   Swaminathan, Subramanyam ^a  

^a BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b SGX Pharmaceuticals Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENOMIC DNA; HELIX LOOP HELIX PROTEIN; PROTEIN YXAF; REGULATOR PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALPHA HELIX; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BACILLUS SUBTILIS; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; DIMERIZATION; LIGAND BINDING; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DNA BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN MOTIF; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BACILLUS SUBTILIS; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; DIMERIZATION; DNA; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, QUATERNARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY, PROTEIN;

BACILLUS SUBTILIS;

EID: 33646806764     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20924     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Baumeister R, Muller G, Hecht B, Killen W. Functional roles of amino acid residues involved in forming the alpha-helix-turn-alpha-helix operator DNA binding motif of Tet repressor from Tn10. Proteins 1992;14:168-177.
2. Pabo CO, Aggarwal AK, Jordan SR, Beamer LJ, Obeysekare UR, Harrison SC. Conserved residues make similar contacts in two repressor-operator complexes. Science 1990;247:1210-1213.
3. Orth P, Schnappinger D, Hillen W, Saenger W, Hinrichs W. Structural basis of gene regulation by the tetracycline inducible Tet repressor-operator system. Nat Struct Biol 2000;7:215-219.
4. Schumacher MA, Miller MC, Grkovic S, Brown MH, Skurray RA, Brennan RG. Structural mechanisms of Qacr induction and multidrug recognition. Science 2001;294:2158-2163.
5. Beamer LJ, Pabo CO. Refined 1.8 A crystal structure of the lambda repressor-operator complex. J Mol Biol 1992;227:177-196.
6. Shimon LJ, Harrison SC. The phage 434 OR2/R1-69 complex at 2.5 A resolution. J Mol Biol 1993;232:826-838.
7. Feng JA, Johnson RC, Dickerson RE. Hin recombinase bound to DNA: the origin of specificity in major and minor groove interactions. Science 1994;263:348-355.
8. Schumacher MA, Choi KY, Zalkin H, Brennan RG. Crystal structure of LacI member, PurR, bound to DNA: minor groove binding by alpha helices. Science 1994;266:763-770.
9. Heldwein EE, Brennan RG. Crystal structure of the transcription activator BmrR bound to DNA and a drug. Nature 2001;409:378-382.
10. Watkins RE, Wisely GB, Moore LB, Collins JL, Lambert MH, Williams SP, Willson TM, Kliewer SA, Redinbo MR. The human nuclear xenobiotic receptor PXR: structural determinants of directed promiscuity. Science 2001;292:2329-2333.
11. Kisker C, Hinrichs W, Tovar K, Hillen W, Saenger W. The complex formed between Tet repressor and tetracycline-Mg2+ reveals mechanism of antibiotic resistance. J Mol Biol 1995;247:260-280.
12. Alekshun MN, Levy SB, Mealy TR, Seaton BA, Head JF. The crystal structure of MarR, a regulator of multiple antibiotic resistance, at 2.3 A resolution. Nat Struct Biol 2001;8:710-714.
13. Dover LG, Corsino PE, Daniels IR, Cocklin SL, Tatituri V, Besra GS, Futterer K. Crystal structure of the Tetr/Camr family repressor mycobacterium tuberculosis Ethr implicated in ethionamide resistance. J Mol Biol 2004;340:1095-1105.
14. Otwinowski Z, Minor W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol 1997;276:307-326.
15. Terwilliger TC. Discrimination of solvent from protein regions in native Fouriers as a means of evaluating heavy-atom solutions in the MIR and MAD methods. Acta Crystallogr 1999;D55:501-505.
16. De La Fortelle E, Bricogne G. Maximum-likelihood heavy atom parameter refinement in the MIR and MAD methods. Methods Enzymology 1997;276:472-493.
17. Abrahams JP, Leslie AG. Methods used in the structure determination of bovine mitochondrial F1 ATPase. Acta Crystallogr 1996;D52:30-42.
18. Perrakis A, Morris R, Lamzin VS. Automated protein model building combined with iterative structure refinement. Nat Struct Biol 1999;6:458-463.
19. Jones TA, Zou J, Cowtan S, Kjeldgaard M. Improved methods in building protein models in electron density map and the location of errors in these models. Acta Crystallogr 1991;A47:110-119.
20. Brunger AT, Adams PD, Clore GM, Delano WL, Gros P, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Jiang JS, Kuszwewski J, Nilges M, Pannu NS and others. Crystallography & NMR system: a new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Crystallogr 1998; D54:905-921.
21. Jiang J, Sweet RM. Protein Data Bank depositions from synchrotron sources. J Synchrotron Rad 2004;11:319-327.
22. Laskowski RA, MacArthur MW, Moss DS, Thornton JM. PRO-CHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality for assessing the accuracy of protein structures. J Appl Crystallogr 1993;26:283-291.
23. Holm L SC. A network tool for protein structure comparison. Trends Biochem Sci 1995;20:478-480.
24. Natsume R, Ohnishi Y, Senda T, Horinouchi S. Crystal structure of a gamma-butyrolactone autoregulator receptor protein in streptomyces coelicolor. J Mol Biol 2004;336:409-419.
25. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994;22:4673-4680.
26. Huffman JL, Brennan RG. Prokaryotic transcription regulators: more than just the helix-turn-helix motif. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002;12:98-106.
27. Nicholls A, Sharp K, Honig B. Protein folding and association: insights from the interfacial and thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons. Proteins 1991;11:281-296.