Human Shugoshin mediates kinetochore-driven formation of kinetochore microtubules

Cell Cycle

Volumn 5, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1094-1101

  Suzuki, Hideaki ^a   Akiyama, Nobutake ^a   Tsuji, Megumi ^a   Ohashi, Toya ^a   Saito, Saburo ^a   Eto, Yoshikatsu ^a  

^a JIKEI UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bundle; Diffusion; Human; Kinetochore; Microtubules; Mitosis; Nucleation; Shugoshin; Spindle assembly; Spindle checkpoint

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN; PROTEIN SHUGOSHIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CELL LINE; CELL STRAIN HEK293; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MICROTUBULE ASSEMBLY; MITOSIS INHIBITION; MITOSIS SPINDLE; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION;

EID: 33646804189     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.5.10.2747     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Maiato H, DeLuca J, Salmon ED, Earnshaw WC. The dynamic kinetochore-microtubule interface. J Cell Sci 2004; 117:5461-77.
2. Kops GJ, Weaver BA, Cleveland DW. On the road to cancer: Aneuploidy and the mitotic checkpoint. Nat Rev Cancer 2005; 5:773-85.
3. Losada A, Hirano T. Dynamic molecular linkers of the genome: The first decade of SMC proteins. Genes Dev 2005; 19:1269-87.
4. Waizenegger IC, Hauf S, Meinke A, Peters JM. Two distinct pathways remove mammalian cohesin from chromosome arms in prophase and from centromeres in anaphase. Cell 2000; 103:399-410.
5. Watanabe Y. Sister chromatid cohesion along arms and at centromeres. Trends Genet 2005; 21:405-12.
6. Hauf S, Roitinger E, Koch B, Dittrich CM, Mechtler K, Peters JM. Dissociation of cohesin from chromosome arms and loss of arm cohesion during early mitosis depends on phosphorylation of SA2. PLoS Biol 2005; 3:e69.
7. Kerrebrock AW, Miyazaki WY, Birnby D, Orr-Weaver TL. The Drosophila mei-S332 gene promotes sister-chromatid cohesion in meiosis following kinetochore differentiation. Genetics 1992; 130:827-41.
8. Tang TT, Bickel SE, Young LM, Orr-Weaver TL. Maintenance of sister-chromatid cohesion at the centromere by the Drosophila MEI-S332 protein. Genes Dev 1998; 12:3843-56.
9. Kitajima TS, Kawashima SA, Watanabe Y. The conserved kinetochore protein shugoshin protects centromeric cohesion during meiosis. Nature 2004; 427:510-7.
10. Rabitsch KP, Gregan J, Schleiffer A, Javerzat JP, Eisenhaber F, Nasmyth K. Two fission yeast homologs of Drosophila mei-S332 are required for chromosome segregation during meiosis I and II. Curr Biol 2004; 14:287-301.
11. Katis VL, Galova M, Rabitsch KP, Gregan J, Nasmyth K. Maintenance of cohesin at centromeres after meiosis I in budding yeast requires a kinetochore-associated protein related to MEI-S332. Curr Biol 2004; 14:560-72.
12. Marston AL, Tham WH, Shah H, Amon A. A genome-wide screen identifies genes required for centromeric cohesion. Science 2004; 303:1367-70.
13. Salic A, Waters JC, Mitchison TJ. Vertebrate shugoshin links sister centromere cohesion and kinetochore microtubule stability in mitosis. Cell 2004; 118:567-78.
14. Hamant O, Golubovskaya I, Meeley R, Fiume E, Timofejeva L, Schleiffer A, Nasmyth K, Cande WZ. A REC8-dependent plant shugoshin is required for maintenance of centromeric cohesion during meiosis and has no mitotic functions. Curr Biol 2005; 15:948-54.
15. Kiburz BM, Reynolds DB, Megee PC, Marston AL, Lee BH, Lee TI, Levine SS, Young RA, Amon A. The core centromere and Sgo1 establish a 50-kb cohesin-protected domain around centromeres during meiosis I. Genes Dev 2005; 19:3017-30.
16. McGuinness BE, Hirota T, Kudo NR, Peters JM, Nasmyth K. Shugoshin prevents dissociation of cohesin from centromeres during mitosis in vertebrate cells. PLoS Biol 2005; 3:e86.
17. Riedel CG, Katis VL, Katou Y, Mori S, Itoh T, Helmhart W, Galova M, Petronczki M, Gregan J, Cetin B, Mudrak I, Ogris E, Mechtler K, Pelletier L, Buchholz F, Shirahige K, Nasmyth K. Protein phosphatase 2A protects centromeric sister chromatid cohesion during meiosis I. Nature 2006; In press.
18. Kitajima TS, Sakuno T, Ishiguro KI, Iemura SI, Natsume T, Kawashima SA, Watanabe Y. Shugoshin collaborates with protein phosphatase 2A to protect cohesin. Nature 2006; In press.
19. Indjeian VB, Stern BM, Murray AW. The centromeric protein Sgo1 is required to sense lack of tension on mitotic chromosomes. Science 2005; 307:130-3.
20. Pinsky BA, Biggins S. The spindle checkpoint: Tension versus attachment. Trends Cell Biol 2005; 15:486-93.
21. Gimenez-Abian JF, Diaz-Martinez LA, Wirth KG, Andrews CA, Gimenez-Martin G, Clarke DJ. Regulated separation of sister centromeres depends on the spindle assembly checkpoint but not on the anaphase promoting Complex/Cyclosome. Cell Cycle 2005; 4:1561-75.
22. Tang Z, Sun Y, Harley SE, Zou H, Yu H. Human Bub1 protects centromeric sister-chromatid cohesion through shugoshin during mitosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101:18012-7.
23. Kitajima TS, Hauf S, Ohsugi M, Yamamoto T, Watanabe Y. Human Bub1 defines the persistent cohesion site along the mitotic chromosome by affecting shugoshin localization. Curr Biol 2005; 15:353-359.
24. Vaur S, Cubizolles F, Plane G, Genier S, Rabitsch PK, Gregan J, Nasmyth K, Vanoosthuyse V, Hardwick KG, Javerzat JP. Control of shugoshin function during fission-yeast meiosis. Curr Biol 2005; 15:2263-2270.
25. Wang X, Yang Y, Dai W. Differential subcellular localizations of two human Sgo1 isoforms: Implications in regulation of sister chromatid cohesion and microtubule dynamics. Cell Cycle 2006; 5:635-40.
26. Harlow E, Lane D. Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Vol 1. 1st ed. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1988.
27. Howell BJ, Hoffman DB, Fang G, Murray AW, Salmon ED. Visualization of Mad2 dynamics at kinetochores, along spindle fibers, and at spindle poles in living cells. J Cell Biol 2000; 150:1233-50.
28. Brummelkamp TR, Bernards R, Agami R. A system for stable expression of short interfering RNAs in mammalian cells. Science 2002; 296:550-3.
29. Kapitein LC, Peterman EJ, Kwok BH, Kim JH, Kapoor TM, Schmidt CF. The bipolar mitotic kinesin Eg5 moves on both microtubules that it crosslinks. Nature 2005; 435:114-8.
30. Maiato H, Rieder CL, Khodjakov A. Kinetochore-driven formation of kinetochore fibers contributes to spindle assembly during animal mitosis. J Cell Biol 2004; 167:831-40.
31. Carazo-Salas RE, Gruss OJ, Mattaj IW, Karsenti E. Ran-GTP coordinates regulation of microtubule nucleation and dynamics during mitotic-spindle assembly. Nat Cell Biol 2001; 3:228-34.
32. Li HY, Cao K, Zheng Y. Ran in the spindle checkpoint: A new function for a versatile GTPase. Trends Cell Biol 2003; 13:553-7.
33. Wollman R, Cytrynbaum EN, Jones JT, Meyer T, Scholey JM, Mogilner A. Efficient chromosome capture requires a bias in the 'search-and-capture' process during mitotic-spindle assembly. Curr Biol 2005; 15:828-32.
34. Caudron M, Bunt G, Bastiaens P, Karsenti E. Spatial coordination of spindle assembly by chromosome-mediated signaling gradients. Science 2005; 309:1373-6.
35. Scanlan MJ, Gout I, Gordon CM, Williamson B, Stockert E, Gure AO, Jager D, Chen YT, Mackay A, O'Hare MJ, Old LJ. Humoral immunity to human breast cancer: Antigen definition and quantitative analysis of mRNA expression. Cancer Immun 2001; 1:4.
36. Karsenti E, Vernos I. The mitotic spindle: A self-made machine. Science 2001; 294:543-7.