Analysis of facial skeleton shape in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate: Geometric morphometry

Acta Chirurgiae Plasticae

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 26-32

  Veleminska J ^a   Katina, S ^b   Smahel Z ^a   Sedlackova M ^a  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^b Physics and Informatics   (Slovakia)

Author keywords

Bookstein's coordinates; Cleft lip and palate; Geometric morphometry; PCA; Repositioning of nasal septum; TPS method

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CLEFT LIP PALATE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRANIOFACIAL MORPHOLOGY; FACE PROFILE; FACE SURGERY; FACIAL BONE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; MORPHOMETRICS; NOSE SEPTUM; NOSE SURGERY; PREDICTION; PUBERTY; TOOTH ARCH;

ADOLESCENT; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CLEFT LIP; CLEFT PALATE; CRANIOFACIAL ABNORMALITIES; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; NASAL SEPTUM; SKULL;

EID: 33646799780     PISSN: 00015423     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bookstein, FL. Morphometric tools for landmark data - geometry and biology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 1991.
2. Dryden, IL., Mardia, KV. Statistical Shape analysis. Chicester: Wiley, 1998.
3. Goodall, C. Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape (with discussion). JRSS B, 53, 1991, p. 285-339.
4. Katina, S. Total variation penalty in image warping and selected multivariate methods in shape analysis. Thesis, Bratislava: Comenius University, 2004.
5. Katina, S. Comparison of Procrustes and Bookstein 2D coordinates in shape analysis: simulations, bagplots for landmarks and applications. Forum Statisticum Slovacum, 2, 2005a, p. 47-51.
6. 2 test using Bookstein 2D coordinates in statistical shape analysis: simulation study and applications. Austrian J. of Statist., 2005b (submitted).
7. Lux, ChJ., Starke, J., Rubel, J., Stellzig, A., Komposch, G. Visualization of individual growth-related craniofacial changes based on cephalometric landmark data: a pilot study. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J., 39, 2002, p. 341-352.
8. Mardia, KV. Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57, 1970, p. 519-530.
9. Mardia, KV., Kent, JT., Bibby, JM. Multivariate Analysis. London: Academic Press, 2000.
10. Richtsmeier, JT, Cheverud, JM. Finite element scaling analysis of human craniofacial growth. J. Craniofac. Genet. Dev. Biol., 6, 1986, p. 289-323.
11. Rousseeuw, PJ., Ruts, I., Tukey, JW. The bagplot: a bivariate boxplot. Am. Statist., 53, 1999, p. 382-387.
12. Sameshima, GT., Banh, DS., Šmahel, Z., Melnick, M. Facial growth after primary periosteoplasty versus primary bone grafting in unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J., 33, 1996, p. 300-305.
13. Singh, GD., McNamara, JA., Lozanoff, S. Thin-plate spline analysis of the cranial base in subjects with Class III malocclusion. Eur. J. Orthod., 19, 1997, p. 341-353.
14. Singh, GD., Rivera-Robles, J., de Jesus-Vinas, J. Longitudinal craniofacial growth patterns with orofacial clefts: geometric morhometrics. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J., 41, 2004, p.136-143.
15. Šmahel, Z. Effects of primary osteoplasty and periosteoplasty on the configuration of the nose in unilateral cleft lip and palate. Acta Chir. Plast., 29, 1987, p. 201-208.
16. Šmahel, Z., Müllerová, Ž., Nejedlý, A. Effect of primary repositioning of the nasal septum on facial growth in unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J., 36, 1999, p. 310-313.
17. Tomanová, M. Růst a vývoj obličeje u pacientů s jednostranným rozštěpem rtu a patra narozených v 70. a 80. letech 20. století. Thesis, Prague: Charles University, 2002.