Reasoning about the relations between relations

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 59, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1047-1069

  Goodwin, Geoffrey P ^a   Johnson Laird, P N ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE;

ADULT; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE;

EID: 33646782225     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02724980543000169     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Birney, D., & Halford, G. S. (2002). Cognitive complexity of suppositional reasoning: An application of relational complexity to the knight-knave task Thinking and Reasoning, 8, 109-134.
2. Bucciarelli, M., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1999). Strategies in syllogistic reasoning. Cognitive Science, 23, 247-303.
3. Byrne, R. M. J., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1989). Spatial reasoning. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 564-575.
4. Carreiras, M., & Santamaría, C. (1997). Reasoning about relations: Spatial and nonspatial problems. Thinking and Reasoning, 3, 191-208.
5. Cherubini, P., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2004). Does everyone love everyone? The psychology of iterative inferences. Thinking & Reasoning, 10, 31-53.
6. Clark, H. H. (1969). Linguistic processes in deductive reasoning. Psychological Review, 76, 387-404.
7. Ford, M. (1995). Two modes of mental representation and problem solution in syllogistic reasoning. Cognition, 54, 1-71.
8. Goodwin, G. P., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2005). Reasoning about relations. Psychological Review, 112, 468-493.
9. Halford, G. S., Baker, R., McCredden, J. E., & Bain, J. D. (2005). How many variables can humans process? Psychological Science, 16, 70-76.
10. Halford, G. S., Wilson, W. H., & Phillips, S. (1998). Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: Implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 803-805.
11. Hartshorne, C., Weiss, P., & Burks, A. (Eds.). (1931-1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vols. 1-8). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Huttenlocher, J. (1968). Constructing spatial images: A strategy in reasoning. Psychological Review, 75, 550-560.
13. Huttenlocher, J., & Strauss, S. (1968). Comprehension and a statement's relation to the situation it describes. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7, 527-530.
14. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1993). The computer and the mind (2nd ed.). London: Fontana Press.
15. Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Hasson, U. (2003). Counterexamples in sentential reasoning. Memory and Cognition, 31, 1105-1113.
16. Kroger, J. K., Holyoak, D. J., & Hummel, J. E. (2004). Varieties of sameness: The impact of relational complexity on perceptual comparisons. Cognitive Science, 28, 335-358.
17. Kull, S. (2004, October 21). The separate realities of Bush and Kerry supporters. Retrieved March 5, 2005, from the Program on International Policy Attitudes Web site: http://www.pipa.org/OnlineReports/Pres_Election_04/ Report10_21_04.pdf
18. Loft, S., Hill, A., Neal, A., Humphreys, M., & Yeo, G. (2004). ATC-lab: An air traffic control simulator for the laboratory. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 331-338.
19. Roberts, M. J. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning strategies: A problem to solve or an opportunity to seize? In W. Schaeken, G. De Vooght, A. Vandierendonck, & G. d'Ydewalle (Eds.), Deductive reasoning and strategies (pp. 23-48). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
20. Schaeken, W., Johnson-Laird, P. N., & d'Ydewalle, G. (1996). Mental models and temporal reasoning. Cognition, 60, 205-234.
21. Van der Henst, J.-B., Yang, Y., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2002). Strategies in sentential reasoning. Cognitive Science, 26, 425-468.