Asynchronous access to conventional course delivery: A pilot project

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 527-537

  Simpson, Natalie ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b 160 Jacobs Management Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASYNCHRONOUS ACCESS; ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE (ESL); GRADUATE STUDENTS; LECTURE-BASED COURSES;

LEARNING SYSTEMS; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; STRATEGIC PLANNING; STUDENTS; VIDEO ON DEMAND;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 33646750578     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00534.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Alavi, M., Youngjin, Y. & Vogel, D. R. (1997). Using information technology to add value to management education. The Academy of Management Journal 40, 6, 1310-1333.
2. Berge, Z. L. & Mrozowski, S. (2001). Review of research in distance education, 1990-1999. American Journal of Distance Education 15, 3, 5-19.
3. Brown, S. (1983). Vidéocassettes versus broadcasts (I.E.T. Papers on Broadcasts No. 228). Walton, Bletchley, Bucks, England: Institute of Educational Technology, British Open University.
4. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13, 3, 319-340.
5. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35, 8, 982-1003.
6. Gagne, M. & Shepherd, M. (2001). A comparison between a distance and a traditional graduate accounting class. T.H.E. Journal 28, 9.
7. Gorsky, P. & Caspi, A. (2005). Dialogue: a theoretical framework for distance education instructional systems. British Journal of Educational Technology 36, 2, 137-144.
8. Hiltz, S. R. & Wellman, B. (1997). Asynchronous learning networks as a virtual classroom. Communications of the ACM 40, 9, 44-49.
9. LeBlanc, G. (2004). Student and faculty survey reveals attitudes to streaming video. Distance Education Report 8, 12, 8.
10. Meyer, K. A. (2002). Quality in distance learning. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports 29, 4, 65.
11. Shephard, K. (2003). Questioning, promoting and evaluating the use of streaming video to support student learning. British Journal of Educational Technology 34, 3, 295-308.
12. Turoff, M., Discenza, R. & Howard, C. (2004). How distance learning will affect students, courses, faculty, and institutional futures. In C. Howard, K. Schenk & R. Discenza (Eds), Distance learning and university effectiveness: changing education paradigms for online learning (pp. 1-20). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
13. Webster, J. & Hackley, P. (1997). Teaching effectiveness in technology - mediated distance learning. The Academy of Management Journal 40, 6, 1282-1309.
14. Wilson, R. L. & Weiser, M. (2001). Adoption of asynchronous learning tools by traditional full-time students: a pilot study. Information Technology and Management 22, 363-375.