Contemporary review of group-oriented contingencies for disruptive behavior

Journal of Applied School Psychology

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 79-101

  Theodore, Lea A ^a   Bray, Melissa A ^b   Kehle, Thomas J ^b   Dioguardi, Richard J ^c  

^a HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^c ST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Behavioral interactions; Contingencies; Groups; Individual students

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646732775     PISSN: 15377903     EISSN: 15377911     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J370v20n01_06     Document Type: Article

References (138)

1. Alden, S. E., Pettigrew, L. E., & Skiba, E. A. (1970). The effect of individual-contingent group reinforcement on popularity. Child Development, 41, 1191-1196.
2. Alexander, R. H., Corbett, T. F., & Smigel, J. (1976). The effects of individual and group consequences on school attendance and curfew violation with predelinquent adolescents. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 221-226.
3. Allen, D. J., McLaughlin, T. F., & Harman, R. (1980). The differential effects of independent and interdependent group oriented contingencies upon a letter tracing task in a special education token reinforcement program. Corrective and Social Psychiatry, 26, 110-114.
4. Ascare, D., & Axelrod, S. (1973). Use of a behavior modification procedure in four open classrooms. Psychology in the Schools, 10, 249-252.
5. Axelrod, S. (1973). Comparison of individual and group contingencies in two special classes. Behavior Therapy, 4, 83-90.
6. Barrish, H. H., Saunders, M., & Wolf, M. M. (1969). Good behavior game: Effects of individual contingencies on disruptive behavior in a classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 119-124.
7. Bear, G. G., & Richards, H. C. (1980). An interdependent group-oriented contingency system for improving academic performance. School Psychology Review, 9, 119-224.
8. Bednar, R. L., Zelhart, P. F., Greathouse, L., & Weinberg, S. (1970). Operant conditioning principles in the treatment of learning and behavior problems with delinquent boys. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 17, 492-497.
9. Bijou, S. W., Birnbauer, J. S., Kidder, J. D., & Tague, C. E. (1966). Programmed instruction as an approach to the teaching of reading, writing, and arithmetic to retarded children. Psychological Record, 16, 505-522.
10. Broden, M., Hall, R. V., Dunlap, A., & Clark, R. (1970). Effects of teacher attention and a token reinforcement system in a junior high school special education class. Exceptional Children, 36, 341-349.
11. Brooks, R. B., & Snow, D. L. (1972). Two case illustrations of the use of behav-ior-modification techniques in the school setting. Behavior Therapy, 3, 100-103.
12. Brown, D., & Reschly, D. (1974). The modification of classroom asocial behaviors: Individual vs. group incentives. School Applications of Learning Theory, 6, 42-49.
13. Brown, D., & Reschly, D., & Sabers, D. (1974). Using group contingencies with punishment and positive reinforcement to modify aggressive behaviors in a Head Start classroom. The Psychological Record, 24, 491-496.
14. Burchard, J. D., & Barrera, F. (1972). An analysis of timeout and response cost in a programmed environment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 271-282.
15. Bushell, D., Wrobel, P. A., & Michaelis, M. L. (1968). Applying "group" contingencies to the classroom study behavior of preschool children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 55-61.
16. Carlson, C. S., Arnold, C. R., Becker, W. C., & Madsen, C. H. (1968). The elimination of tantrum behavior of a child in an elementary classroom. Behavior Research and Therapy, 6, 117-119.
17. Chadwick, B. A., & Day, R. C. (1971). Systematic reinforcement: Academic performance of underachieving students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 4, 311-317.
18. Cipani, E., Hayes, E., & Swope, R. (1981). The effects of a behavioral "package program" on deficit skills in emotionally handicapped students. Corrective and Social Psychiatry and Journal of Behavior Technology Methods and Therapy, 27, 48-61.
19. Cocalis, J. D. (1972). An evaluation of peer group rewards as modifiers of academic underachievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
20. Coleman, R. (1970). A conditioning technique applicable to elementary school classrooms. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 3, 293-297.
21. Cowen, R. J., Jones, F. H., & Bellack, A. S. (1979). Grandma's rule with group contingencies: A cost efficient means of classroom management. Behavior Modification, 3, 397-418.
22. Coyne, P. D. (1978). The effects of peer tutoring with group contingencies on the academic performance of college students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 305-307.
23. Crouch, P. L., Gresham, F. M., & Wright, W. R. (1985). Interdependent and independent group contingencies with immediate and delayed reinforcement for controlling classroom behavior. The Journal of School Psychology, 35, 177-187.
24. Crow, R. E., & Cheney, C. D. (1977). Comparison of group and individual reinforcement contingencies on student performance. Education, 97, 367-370.
25. Cullinan, D., & Epstein, M. H. (1985). Behavioral interventions for educating adolescents with behavior disorders. The Pointer, 30, 4-7.
26. Davis, P. K., & Blankenship, C. J. (1996). Group-oriented contingencies: Applications for community rehabilitation programs. Vocational Evaluation and Work Adjustment Bulletin, 29, 114-118.
27. Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. N. (2001). Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation in education: Reconsidered once again. Review of Educational Research, 71, 1-27.
28. Dietz, S. M., & Repp, A. C. (1973). Decreasing classroom misbehavior through the use of DRL schedules of reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 457-463.
29. Drabman, R. S. (1973). Child versus teacher-administered token programs in a psychiatric hospital school. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1, 68-87.
30. Drabman, R. S., Spitalnik, R., & O'Leary, K. D. (1973). Teaching self-control to disruptive children. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 82, 10-16.
31. Edwards, J. S. (1976). Self-management in children labeled learning disabled. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 8, 51-53.
32. Eleftherious, C. P., Shoudt, J. T., & Strang, H. R. (1972). The game machine: Technological approach to classroom control. Journal of School Psychology, 10, 55-59.
33. Ellery, M. D., Blampied, N. M., & Black, W. (1975). Reduction of disruptive behavior in the classroom: Group and individual reinforcement contingencies compared. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 10, 59-65.
34. Elliot, S. N., Turco, T. L., & Gresham, F. M. (1987). Consumers' and clients' pretreatment acceptability ratings of classroom group contingencies. Journal of School Psychology, 25, 145-153.
35. Evans, G. W., & Oswalt, G. C. (1968). Acceleration of academic progress through the manipulation of peer influence. Behavior Research and Therapy, 6, 189-195.
36. Ferritor, D. E., Buckholdt, D., Hamblin, R. L., & Smith, L. (1972). The noneffects of contingent reinforcement for attending behavior on work accomplished. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 7-17.
37. Frankosky, R. J., & Sulzer-Azaroff, B. (1978). Individual and group contingencies and collateral social behaviors. Behavior Therapy, 9, 313-327.
38. Gamble, A., & Strain, P. S. (1979). The effects of dependent and interdependent group contingencies on socially appropriate responses in classes for emotionally handicapped children. Psychology in the Schools, 16, 253-260.
39. Garrison, S. R., & Stolberg, A. L. (1983). Modification of anger in children by affective imagery training. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 11, 115-130.
40. Geller, E. S., Chaffee, J. L., & Ingram, R. E. (1975). Promoting paper recycling on a university campus. Journal of Experimental Systems, 5, 39-57.
41. Glynn, E. L. (1970). Classroom applications of self-determined reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 3, 123-132.
42. Glynn, E. L, Thomas, J. D., & Shee, S. M. (1973). Behavioral self-control of on-task behavior in an elementary classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 105-113.
43. Gola, T. J., Holmes, P. A., & Holmes, N. K. (1982). Effectiveness of a group contingency procedure for increasing prevocational behavior of profoundly mentally retarded residents. Mental Retardation, 20, 26-29.
44. Grandy, G. S., Madsen, C.H., & DeMersseman, L. M. (1973). The effects of individual and interdependent contingencies on inappropriate classroombehavior. Psychology in the Schools, 10, 488-493.
45. Graubard, P. S. (1969). Utilizing the group in teaching disturbed delinquents to learn. Exceptional Children, 36, 267-272.
46. Greenberg, D. J., & O'Donnell, W. J. (1972). A note on the effects of group and individual contingencies upon deviant classroom behavior. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 13, 55-58.
47. Greene, B. F., Bailey, J. S., & Barber, F. (1981). An analysis and reduction of disruptive behavior on school buses. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 177-192.
48. Greenwood, C. R., Hops, H., Delquadri, J., & Guild, J. (1974). Group contingencies for group consequences in classroom management: A further analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 413-425.
49. Gresham, F. M., & Gresham, G. N. (1982). Interdependent, dependent, and independent group contingencies for controlling disruptive behavior. The Journal of Special Education, 16, 01-110.
50. Hall, R. V., Fox, R., Willard, D., Goldsmith, L., Emerson, M., Owen, M., Davis, F., & Porcia, E. (1971). The teacher as observer and experimenter in the modification of disrupting and talking-out behaviors. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 4, 141-149.
51. Hall, R. V., Panyan, M., Rabon, D., & Broden, M. (1968). Instructing beginning teachers in reinforcement procedures which improve classroom control. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 315-322.
52. Hamblin, R. L., Hathaway, C., & Wodarski, J. S. (1971). Group contingencies, peer tutoring and accelerating academic achievement. In E. A. Ramp and B. L. Hopkins (Eds.), A new direction for education: Behavior analysis. Vol. 1. (pp. 41-53). Lawrence: The University of Kansas.
53. Haring, N. C., & Hauck, M. (1969). Improved learning conditions in the establishment of reading skills with disabled readers. Exceptional Children, 35, 341-352.
54. Harris, V. W., & Sherman, J. A. (1973). Use and analysis of the "Good Behavior Game" to reduce disruptive classroom behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 405-417.
55. Herman, S. H., & Tramontana, J. (1971). Instructions and group vs. individual reinforcement in modifying disruptive group behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 4, 113-119.
56. Hewett, F., Taylor, F., & Artuso, A. (1969). The Santa Monica project: Evaluation of an engineered classroom design with emotionally disturbed children. Exceptional Children, 35, 523-529.
57. Hopkins, B. L., Schutte, R. C. & Garton, K. L. (1971). The effects of access to a playroom on the rate and quality of printing and writing of first and second grade students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 4, 77-87.
58. Hughes, H. M. (1979). Behavior change in children at a therapeutic summer camp as a function of feedback and individual versus group contingencies. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 7, 211-219.
59. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. (1990, October). Public Law 101-476. (Reauthorized July, 1997). Public Law 105-17.20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.
60. Jenson, W. R. (1978). Behavior modification in secondary schools: A review. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 11, 53-63.
61. Kazdin, A. E., & Forsberg, G. (1974). Effects of group reinforcement and punishment on classroom behavior. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 9, 50-55.
62. Kazdin, A. E., & Geesey, S. (1977). Simultaneous-treatment design comparisons of the effects of earning reinforcers for one's peers versus oneself. Behavior Therapy, 8, 682-693.
63. Kazdin, A. E., & Klock, J. (1973). The effect of nonverbal teacher approval on student attentive behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 643-654.
64. Kelshaw, K., Sterling-Turner, H. E., Henry, J., & Skinner, C. H. (2000). Randomized interdependent group contingencies: Group reinforcement with a twist. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 523-533.
65. Knapczyk, D. R., & Livingston, G. (1973). Self-recording and student teacher supervision: Variables within a token economy structure. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 481-486.
66. Koch, L., & Breyer, N. L. (1974). A token economy for the teacher. Psychology in the Schools, 11, 195-200.
67. Kubany, E. S., Weiss, L. E., & Sloggett, B.B. (1971). The good behavior clock: A reinforcement/time out procedure for reducing disruptive classroom behavior. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 2, 173-179.
68. Levin, L. (1971). A comparison of individual and group contingencies with third and fourth grade children. Probe, 1, 12-13.
69. Lew, M., Mesch, D., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1986). Components of cooperative learning: Effects of collaborative skills and academic group contingencies on achievement and mainstreaming. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 229-239.
70. Liebson, I., Cohen, M., & Faillace, L. (1972). Group fines: Technique for behavioral control in a token economy. Psychological Reports, 30, 895-900.
71. Litow, L., & Pumroy, D. K. (1975). A brief review of classroom group-oriented contingencies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 341-347.
72. Lloyd, J. W., Eberhardt, M. J., & Drake, G. P. (1996). Group versus individual reinforcement contingencies within the context of group study conditions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 189-200.
73. Long, J. D., & Williams, R. L. (1973). The comparative effectiveness of group and individually contingent free time with inner-city junior high school students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 465-474.
74. Lovitt, T. C., Guppy, T. E., & Blattner, J. E. (1969). The use of free time contingency with fourth graders to increase spelling accuracy. Behavior Research and Therapy, 7, 151-156.
75. Maloney, K. B., & Hopkins, B. L. (1973). The modification of sentence structure and its relationship to subjective judgements of creativity in writing. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 425-433.
76. Margolis, J. M. (1982). Effects of dependent and interdependent group contingencies on the academic performance, behavioral patterns and sociometric status of elementary classroom children. Dissertation Abstracts International, 42 (10-A), 4368-4369.
77. Marholin, D., & Gray, D. (1976). Effects of group response-cost procedures on cash shortages in a small business. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 25-30.
78. Martin, M., Burkholder, R., Rosenthal, R. L., Tharp, R. G., & Thorne, G. L. (1968). Programming behavior change and reintegration into school milieu of extreme adolescent deviates. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 6, 371-383.
79. McAllister, L. W., Stachowiak, J. G., Baer, D. M., & Conderman, L. (1969). The application of operant conditioning techniques in a secondary school classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 277-285.
80. McKenzie, H. S., Clark, M., Wolf, M. M., Kothera, R., & Benson, C. (1968). Behavior modification of children with learning disabilities using grades as tokens and allowances as back up reinforcers. Exceptional Children, 34, 745-752.
81. McLaughlin, T. F. (1981). The effects of individual and group contingencies on reading performance of special education students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 6, 76-79.
82. McLaughlin, T. F. (1982). A comparison of individual and group contingencies on spelling performance with special education students. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 4, 1-10.
83. McLaughlin, T. F., Brown, D., Malaby, J. E., & Dolliver, P. (1977). The comparative effects of a timing device and group and individual contingencies for on-task behavior and academic responding in a special education class. Behavioral Engineering, 4, 11-15.
84. McNally, R. J., Norusis, P. L., Gentz, S. A., & McConathy, L. C. (1983). Use of self-delivered reinforcement and group contingency management to increase productivity of severely retarded workers. Psychological Reports, 52, 499-503.
85. McNamara, J. R., (1971). Behavioral interventions in the classroom: Changing students and training a teacher. Adolescence, 6, 433-440.
86. McReynolds, W. T., Gange, J. J., & Speltz, M. L. (1981). Effects of multiple individual and group operant contingencies on student performance. Education and Treatment of Children, 4, 227-241.
87. Medland, M. B., & Stachnik, T. J. (1972). Good behavior game: A replication and systematic analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 45-51.
88. Meichenbaum, D. H., Bowers, K. S., & Ross, R. R. (1968). Modification of classroom behavior of institutionalized female adolescent offenders. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 6, 343-353.
89. Mesch, D., Lew, M., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1986). Isolated teenagers, cooperative learning, and the training of social skills. The Journal of Psychology, 120, 323-334.
90. Meyers, A., Artz, L., & Craighead, W. (1976). The effects of instructions, incentive, and feedback on a community problem: A dormitory noise. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 445-457.
91. O'Leary, K. D., & Becker, W. C. (1967). Behavior modification of an adjustment class: A token reinforcement program. Exceptional Children, 75, 379-398.
92. Packard, R. G. (1970). The control of "classroom attention": A group contingency for complex behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 3, 13-28.
93. Page, D. P., & Edwards, R. P. (1978). Behavior change strategies for reducing disruptive classroom activity. Psychology in the Schools, 15, 413-418.
94. Patterson, G. R. (1965). An application of conditioning techniques to the control of a hyperactive child. In L. P. Ullmann and L. Krasner (Ed.), Case studies in behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. pp. 370-375.
95. Patterson, G. R., Jones, R., Whittier, J., & Wright, M. A. (1965). A behavior modification technique for the hyperactive child. Behavior Research and Therapy, 2, 217-226.
96. Pigott, H. E., Fantuzzo, J. W., & Clement, P. W. (1986). The effects of reciprocal peer tutoring and group contingencies on the academic performance of elementary school children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 19, 93-98.
97. Proctor, M. A., & Morgan, D. (1991). Effectiveness of a response cost raffle procedure on the disruptive classroom behavior of adolescents with behavior problems. School Psychology Review, 20, 97-109.
98. Quay, H. C., Werry, J. S., McQueen, M., & Sprague, R. L. (1966). Remediation of the conduct problem child in the special class setting. Exceptional Children, 32, 509-515.
99. Rhode, G., Jenson, W. R., & Rheavis, H. K. (1993). The tough kid book: Practical classroom management strategies. Longmont, CO: Sopris West, Inc.
100. Ringer, V. M. J. (1973). The use of a "token helper" in the management of classroom behavior problems and in teacher training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 671-677.
101. Ritschl, C., Mongrella, J., & Presbie, R. J. (1972). Group time-out from rock and roll music and out-of seat behavior of handicapped children while riding a school bus. Psychological Reports, 31, 967-973.
102. Robertshaw, C. S., & Hiebert, H. D. (1973). The astronaut game: A group contingency applied to a first grade classroom. School Applications of Learning Theory, 6, 28-33.
103. Rosen, G. M., & Lichtenstein, E. (1977). An employee incentive program to reduce cigarette smoking. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 957.
104. Ruppert, M. F. (1971). A study of the effect of individual and group rewards for appropriate social classroom behavior upon social classroom behavior in a junior high school setting. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, American University, Washington, D.C.
105. Schmidt, G. W., & Ulrich, R. E. (1969). Effects of group contingent events upon classroom noise. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 171-179.
106. Schutte, R. C., & Hopkins, B. L. (1970). The effects of teacher attention on following instructions in a kindergarten class. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 3, 117-122.
107. Shapiro, E. S., Albright, T. S., & Ager, C. L. (1986). Group versus individual contingencies in modifying two disruptive adolescents' behavior. Professional School Psychology, 1, 105-116.
108. Shapiro, E. S., & Goldberg, R. (1986). A comparison of group contingencies for increasing spelling performance among sixth grade students. School Psychology Review, 15, 546-557.
109. Shapiro, E. S., & Goldberg, R. (1990). In vivo rating of treatment acceptability by children: Group size effects in group contingencies to improve spelling performance. Journal of School Psychology, 28, 233-250.
110. Shores, R. E., Apolloni, T., & Norman, C. W. (1976). Changes in peer verbalizations accompanying individual and group contingencies to modify on-task behavior. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 43, 1155-1162.
111. Simmons, J. T., & Wasik, B. H. (1973). Use of small group contingencies and special activity times to manage behavior in a first-grade classroom. Journal of School Psychology, 11, 228-237.
112. Skinner, C. H., Cashwell, C. S., & Dunn, M. S. (1996). Independent and interdependent group contingencies: Smoothing the rough waters. Special Services in the Schools, 12, 61-77.
113. Sloggett, B. B. (1971). Use of group activities and team rewards to increase individual classroom productivity. Teaching Exceptional Children, 3, 54-66.
114. Speltz, M. L., Moore, J. E., & McReynolds, W. T. (1979). A comparison of standardized and group contingencies in a classroom setting. Behavior Therapy, 10, 219-226.
115. Stage, S. A., & Quiroz, D. R. (1997). A meta-analysis of interventions to decrease disruptive classroom behavior in public education settings. School Psychology Review, 26, 339-368.
116. Stewart, J. P., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1986). Effects of group and individual contingencies on reading performance with Native American junior high school students. Techniques, 2, 133-144.
117. Swanson, H. L. (1985). Improving same-sex and heterosexual interactions of emotionally disturbed adolescents. Journal of School Psychology, 23, 365-374.
118. Switzer, E. B., Deal, T. E., & Bailey, J. S. (1977). The reduction of stealing in second graders using a group contingency. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 10, 267-272.
119. Sulzbacher, S. I., & Houser, J. E. (1968). A tactic to eliminate disruptive behaviors in the classroom: Group contingent consequences. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 73, 88-90.
120. Theodore, L. A., Bray, M. A., Kehle, T. J., & Jenson, W. R. (2000). The use of group dependent and randomization procedures to reduce disruptive classroom behavior. Journal of School Psychology, 39, 267-277.
121. Thomas, J. R., Lee, A. M., McGee, L., & Silverman, S. (1987). Effects of individual and group contingencies on disruptive playground behavior. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 20, 66-76.
122. Turco, T. L., & Elliot, S.N. (1990). Acceptability and effectiveness of group contingencies for improving spelling achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 28, 27-37.
123. Walker, H. M., & Buckley, N. K. (1972). Programming generalization and maintenance of treatment effects across time and across settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 209-224.
124. Wampold, B. E. (2001). The great psychotherapy debate: Models, methods, andfind-ings. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
125. Wasik, B. H. (1970). The application of Premack's generalization on reinforcement to the management of classroom behavior. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 10, 33-43.
126. Williamson, D. A., Sewell, W. R., Sanders, S. H., & Haney, J. N. (1977). The treatment of reluctant speech using contingency management procedures. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 8, 151-156.
127. Williamson, D. A., Williamson, S. H., Watkins, P. C., & Hughes, H. E. (1992). Increasing cooperation among children using dependent group-oriented reinforcement contingencies. Behavior Modification, 16, 414-425.
128. Willis, J., & Crowder, J. A. (1972). A portable device for group modification of classroom attention behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 199-202.
129. Wilson, S. H., & Williams, R. L. (1973). The effects of group contingencies on first graders' academic and social behaviors. Journal of School Psychology, 11, 110-117.
130. Winett, R. A., Battersby, C. D., & Edwards, S. M. (1975). The effects of architectural change, individualized instruction, and group contingencies on the academic performance and social behavior of sixth graders. Journal of School Psychology, 13, 28-40.
131. Winett, R., & Vachon, R. L. (1973). Group feedback and group contingencies in modifying behavior of fifth graders. Psychological Reports, 34, 1283-1292.
132. Witmer, J. F., & Geller, E. S. (1976). Facilitating paper recycling: Effects of prompts, raffles, and contests. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 315-322.
133. Witt, J. C., & Elliot, S.N. (1982). The response cost lottery: A time efficient and effective classroom intervention. Journal of School Psychology, 20, 155-161.
134. Wodarski, J. S., Hamblin, R. L., Buckholdt, D. R., & Ferritor, D. E. (1972). The effects of low performance group and individual contingencies on cooperative behaviors exhibited by fifth graders. The Psychological Record, 22, 359-368.
135. Wodarski, J. S., Hamblin, R. L., Buckholdt, D. R., & Ferritor, D. E. (1973). Individual consequences versus different shared consequences contingent on the performance of low-achieving group members. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3, 276-290.
136. Wolf, J. A., Fantuzzo, J., & Wolter, C. (1984). Student-administered group-oriented contingencies: A method of combining group-oriented contingencies and self-directed behavior to increase academic productivity. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 6, 45-59.
137. Wolf, M. M., Giles, D. K., & Hall, R. V. (1968). Experiments with token reinforcement in a remedial classroom. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 6, 51-64.
138. Wolf, M. M., Hanley, E. L., King, L. A., Lachowicz, J., & Giles, D. K. (1970). The timer-game: A Variable interval contingency management of out-of-seat behavior. Exceptional Children, 37, 113-117.