Independent and interdependent group contingencies: Smoothing the rough waters

Special Services in the Schools

Volumn 12, Issue 1-2, 1996, Pages 61-78

  Skinner, Christopher H ^a   Cashwell, Craig S ^a   Dunn, Merrily S ^a  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85023819105     PISSN: 07399820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J008v12n01_04     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Axelrod, S. (1973). Comparison of individual and group contingencies in two special classes. Behavior Therapy, 4, 83-90.
2. Bear, G. G., & Richards, H. C. (1980). An interdependent group-oriented contingency system for improving academic performance. School Psychology Review, 9, 119-224.
3. Barrish, H. H., Saunders, M., & Wolf, M. M. (1969), Good behavior game: Effects of individual contingencies for group behavior in a classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 119-124.
4. Cooke, N. L. (1984). Misrepresentations of the behavioral model in preservice teacher education textbooks. In W. L. Heward, T. E. Heron, D. S. Hill, & J. Trap-Porter (Eds.), Focus on Behavior Analysis in Education (pp. 197-217). Columbus: Merrill.
5. Englemann, S. (1991). Change schools through revolution, not evolution. Journal of Behavioral Education, 1, 295-304.
6. Forness, S. R. & Kavale, K. A. (1991). School psychologists’ roles and functions: Integration into the regular classroom. In G. Stoner, M. R. Sbinn, & H. M. Walker (Eds.), Interventions for Achievement and Behavior Problems (pp. 21-36). Washington: National Association of School Psychologists.
7. Gamble, A., & Strain, P. S. (1979). The effects of dependent and interdependent group contingencies on socially appropriate responses in classes for emotionally handicapped children. Psychology in the Schools, 16, 253-260.
8. Grandy, G. S., Madsen, C. H., & De Mersseman, L. M. (1973). The effects of individual and interdependent contingencies on inappropriate classroom behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 10, 488-493.
9. Greene, B. F., Bailey, I. S. & Barber, F. (1981). An analysis and reduction of disruptive behavior on school buses. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 177-192.
10. Gresham, F. M. (1995). Social skills training. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology-Ill (pp. 1021-1030). National Association of School Psychologists: Washington.
11. Gresham, F. M. & Gresham, G. N. (1982). Interdependent, dependent, and independent group contingencies for controlling disruptive behavior. The Journal of Special Education, 16, 101-110.
12. Hall, R. V. (1991). Behavior analysis and education: An unfulfilled dream. Journal of Behavioral Education, 1, 305-316.
13. Hayes, L. A. (1976). The use of group contingencies for behavior control: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 628-648.
14. Heller, K., & Monahan, J. (1977). Psychology and community change. Home-wood, IL: Dorsey Press.
15. Lano, R. (1987). The study and development of teaching: With implications for the advancement of special education, Remedial and Special Education, 7, 50-61.
16. Lew, M., Mesch, D. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1986). Positive interdependence, academic and collaborative-skills group contingencies and isolated students. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 341-347.
17. Litow, L., & Pumroy, D. K. (1975). A brief review of classroom group oriented contingencies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 341-347.
18. Mace, F. C, Brown, D. K., & West, B. J. (1987). Behavior self-management in education. In C. A. Maher and J. E. Zins (Eds.), Psychoeducational interventions in the schools: Methods and procedures for enhancing student competence (pp. 160-176). New York: Pergamon.
19. Martens, B. K., & Witt, J. C. (1988). Expanding the scope of behavioral consultation: A systems approach to classroom behavior change. Professional School Psychology, 3, 271-281.
20. Neef, N. A., Shade, D., & Miller, M. S. (1994). Assessing the influential dimensions of reinforcers on choice in students with serious emotional disturbance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 575-583.
21. Nelson, R. O., & Hayes, S. C. (1981). Theoretical explanations of reactivity in self-monitoring. Behavior Modification, 5, 2-14.
22. O’Leary. K. D, Poulos, R. W. & Devine, V. T. (1972). Tangible reinforcers: Bonuses or bribes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 38, 1-8.
23. Piersel, W. C, & Gutkin, T. B, (1983). Resistance to school-based consultation: A behavioral analysis of the problem. Psychology in the Schools, 20, 311-320.
24. Pigott, H. E., Fantuzzo, J. W., & Clement, P. W. (1986). The effects of reciprocal peer tutoring and group contingencies on the academic performance of elementary school children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 19, 93-98.
25. Pumroy, D. K., & Mclntire, R. (1991). Behavior analysis/modification for everyone. Journal of Behavioral Education, 1, 283-294.
26. Salend, S. J., Reynolds, C. J., Coyle, E. M. (1989). Individualizing the good behavior game across type and frequency of behavior with emotionally disturbed adolescents. Behavior Modification, 13, 108-126.
27. Shapiro, E. S., & Goldberg, R. (1986). A comparison of group contingencies for increasing spelling performance among sixth grade students. School Psychology Review, 15, 546-557.
28. Skinner, C. H., & Watson, T. S. (1995). Lotteries in the classroom. Legends, 15, 2-3.
29. Slavin, R. E. (1977). Group contingency structure: An analytic and practical review. Review of Educational Research, 47, 633-650.
30. Slavin, R. E. (1987). Cooperative learning: Where behavioral and humanistic approaches to classroom management meet. The Elementary School Journal, 88, 29-37.
31. Slavin, R. E. (1991). Cooperative learning and group contingencies. Journal of Behavioral Education, 1, 105-116.
32. Speltz, M. L., Shimamura, J. W., & McReynolds, W. T. (1982). Procedural variations in group contingencies: Effects on children’s academic and social behaviors. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 15, 533-544.
33. Stewart, J. P., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1986). Effects of group and individual contingencies on reading performance with native american junior high school students. Techniques: A Journal for Remedial Education and Counseling, 2, 133-144.
34. Stokes, T. F., & Baer, D. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349-367.
35. Sulzer-Azaroff, B., & Mayer, G. R. (1986). Achieving educational excellence: Using behavioral strategies. New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.
36. Turco, T. L., & Elliott, S. N. (1990). Acceptability and effectiveness of group contingencies for improving spelling achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 28, 27-37.
37. Turnbull, H. R. (1990). Free appropriate public education (3rd ed.). Denver, CO: Love Publishing.
38. Watson, T. S. (1994). The role of preservice education in training teachers to serve behaviorally disordered children. Contemporary Education, 65, 128-131.
39. Wielkiewicz, R. M. (1986). Behavior management in the schools: Principles and procedures. New York: Pergamon.