Syllables as functional units in a copying task

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 432-452

  Kandel, Sonia ^a,b   Valdois, Sylviane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PIERRE MENDÈS FRANCE   (France)

^b EL COLEGIO DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALOG DIGITAL CONVERTER; ARTICLE; CAMERA; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GAZE; GESTURE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPELLING; VISION;

EID: 33646709887     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: 14640732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690960400018378     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Bogaerts, H., Meulenbroek, R. G. J., & Thomassen, A. J. W. M. (1996). The possible role of the syllable as a processing unit in handwriting. In M. L. Simner, C. G. Leedham, & A. J. W. M. Thomassen (Eds.), Handwriting and drawing research: Basic and applied issues (pp. 115-126). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
2. Caramazza, A., & Miceli, G. (1990). The structure of graphemic representations. Cognition, 37, 243-297.
3. Caramazza, A., Miceli, G., Villa, G., & Romani, C. (1987). The role of the graphemic buffer in spelling: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Cognition, 26, 59-85.
4. Carreiras, M., Alvarez, C. J., & de Vega, M. (1993). Syllable frequency and visual word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 766-780.
5. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
6. Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D., & Segui, J. (1986). The syllable's differing role in the segmentation of French and English. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 385-400.
7. Dell, G. (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 96(3), 283-321.
8. Ehri, L. C. (1986). Sources of difficulty in learning to spell and read. In M. L. Wolraich & D. Routh (Eds.), Advances in developmental and behavioral pediatrics (Vol. 7, pp. 191-195). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
9. Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developemental dyslexia. In K. E. Paterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia: Cognitive and neuropsychological studies of phonological reading (pp. 301-330). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
10. Garret, M. F. (1979). Levels of processing in sentence production. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production (pp. 177-220). London: Academic Press.
11. Gentry, J. R. (1982). An analysis of developmental spelling in GNYS AT WRK. Reading Teacher, 36, 192-200.
12. Goswami, U., Gombert, J.-E., & Fraca de Barrera, L. (1998). Children's orthographic representations and linguistic transparency: Nonsense word reading in English, French, and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 19-52.
13. Goswami, U., Ziegler, J. C., Dalton, L., & Schneider, W. (2001). Pseudohomophone effects and phonological recoding procedures in reading development in English and German. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 648-664.
14. Goswami, U., Ziegler, J. C., Dalton, L., & Schneider, W. (2003). Nonword reading across orthographies: How flexible is the choice of reading units? Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(2), 235-247.
15. Humblot, L., Fayol, M., & Lonchamp, K. (1994). La copie de mots en CP et CE1. Repères, 9, 47-60.
16. Laberge, K. S., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.
17. Landerl, K. (2000). Influences of orthographic consistency and reading instruction on the development of nonword reading skills. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15, 239-257.
18. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
19. Levelt, W. J. M. (1992). Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes and representations. Cognition, 42, 1-22.
20. Marsh, G., Friedman, M., Welch, V., & Desberg, P. (1980). The development of strategies in spelling. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 339-354). London: Academic Press.
21. Martlew, M. (1992). Handwriting and spelling: Dyslexic children's abilities compared with children of the same age and younger children of the same spelling level. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 375-390.
22. McCloskey, M., Badecker, W., Goodman-Schulman, R. A., & Aliminosa, D. (1994). The structure of graphemic representations in spelling: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11, 341-392.
23. Mehler, J., Dommergues, J., Frauenfelder, U., & Segui, J. (1981). The syllable's role in speech segmentation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 298-305.
24. Meulenbroek, R. G. J., & Van Galen, G. P. (1986). Movement analysis of repetitive behavior of first, second and third grade primary school children. In H. S. R. Kao, G. P. V. Galen, & R. Hoosein (Eds.), Graphonomics: Contemporary research in handwriting (pp. 71-92). Amsterdam: North Holland.
25. Meulenbroek, R. G. J., & Van Galen, G. P. (1988). The acquisition of skilled handwriting: Discontinuous trends in kinematic variables. In A. M. Cooley & J. R. Beech (Eds.), Cognition and action in skilled behavior (pp. 273-281). Amsterdam: North Holland.
26. Meulenbroek, R. G. J., & Van Galen, G. P. (1989). The production of connecting strokes in cursive writing: Developing co-articulation in 8 to 12 year-old children. In R. Plamondon, C. Y. Suen, & M. L. Simner (Eds.), Computer recognition and human production of handwriting. Singapore: World Scientific.
27. Meulenbroek, R. G. J., & Van Galen, G. P. (1990). Perceptual-motor complexity of printed and cursive letters. Journal of Experimental Education, 58, 95-110.
28. Mojet, W. (1991). Characteristics of developing handwriting skills in elementary education. In J. Wann, A. M. Wing & N. Søvik (Eds.) Development of graphic skills (pp. 53-75). London: Academic Press.
29. Morais, J., Content, A., Cary, L., Mehler, J., & Segui, J. (1989). Syllabic segmentation and literacy. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 57-67.
30. New, B., Pallier, C., Ferrand, L., & Matos, R. (2001). Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: Lexique. L'Année Psychologique, 101, 447-462.
31. Orliaguet, J. P., & Boë, L. J. (1993). The role of linguistics in the speed of handwriting movements. Acta Psychologica, 82, 103-113.
32. Patterson, K. E., & Shewell, C. (1987). Speak and spell: Dissociations and word class effects. In M. Coltheart, R. Job, & G. Sartori (Eds.), The cognitive neuropsychology of language. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
33. Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P. B. Gough, L.C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145-174). Hillsdale: NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
34. Prinzmetal, W., Treiman, R., & Rho, S. H. (1986). How to see a reading unit. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 461-475.
35. Rabiner, L. R., & Gold, B. (1975). Theory and application of digital signal processing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
36. Rapp, B. (1992). The nature of sublexical orthographic organization: The bigram trough hypothsis examined. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 33-53.
37. Rieben, L., Meyer, A., & Perregaux, C. (1989). Différences individuelles et représentations lexicales : Comment cinq enfants de 6 ans recherchent et copient des mots. In L. Rieben & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), L'apprenti lecteur (pp. 145-169). Neuchâtel, Switzerland: Delachaux & Niestlé.
38. Rieben, L., & Saada-Robert, M. (1991). Developmental patterns and individual differences in the word-search strategies of beginning readers. Learning and Instruction, 1, 67-87.
39. Rittle-Johnson, B., & Siegler, R. S. (1999). Learning to spell: Variability, choice and change in children's strategy use. Child Development, 70, 332-348.
40. Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation of literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94(2), 143-174.
41. Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151-218.
42. Share, D. L. (1999). Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: A direct test of the self-teaching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 95-129.
43. Spoehr, K. T., & Smith, E. E. (1975). The role of orthographic and phonotactic rules in perceiving letter patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 104, 21-34.
44. Tainturier, M. J., & Caramazza, A. (1996). The status of double letters in graphemic representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 36(1), 53-73.
45. Transler, C., Leybaert, J., & Gombert, J.-E. (1999). Do deaf children use phonological syllables as reading units? Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 4(2), 124-143.
46. Van Galen, G. P. (1991). Handwriting: Issues for a psychomotor theory. Human Movement Science, 10, 165-191.
47. Van Galen, G. P., Meulenbroek, R. G., & Hylkema, H. (1986). On the simultaneous processing of words, letters and strokes in handwriting: Evidence for a mixed linear and parallel model. In H. S. R. Kao, G. P. V. Galen & R. Hoosain (Eds.), Graphonomics: Contemporary research in handwriting (pp. 5-20). Amsterdam: North Holland.
48. Zesiger, P., Mounoud, P., & Hauert, C. A. (1993). Effects of lexicality and trigram frequency on handwriting production in children and adults. Acta Psychologica, 82, 353-365.
49. Zesiger, P., Orliaguet, J. P., Boë, L. J., & Mounoud, P. (1994). The influence of syllabic structure in handwriting and typing production. In C. Faure, G. Lorette & A. Vinter (Eds.), Advances in handwriting and drawing: A multidisciplinary approach (pp. 389-401). Paris: Europia.
50. Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., Jacobs, A. M., & Braun, M. (2001). Identical words are read differently in different languages. Psychological Science, 12(5), 379-384.