Management of radial scars found at percutaneous breast biopsy

Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 72-78

  Becker, Lisa ^a   Trop, Isabelle ^b   David, Julie ^b   Latour, Mathieu ^b   Ouimet Oliva, Denise ^b   Gaboury, Louis ^b   Lalonde, Lucie ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE L UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biopsy; Mammography; Neoplasm

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER RISK; CANCER SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PERCUTANEOUS BIOPSY; SCAR;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST DISEASES; CICATRIX; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 33646690731     PISSN: 08465371     EISSN: 08465371     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Alleva DQ, Smetherman DH, Farr GH Jr, Cederbom GJ. Radial scar of the breast: radiologic-pathologic correlation in 22 cases. Radiographics 1999;19:27-35.
2. Frouge C, Tristant H, Guinebretiere JM. Mammographic lesions suggestive of radial scars: microscopic findings in 40 cases. Radiology 1995;195:623-5.
3. Hassell P, Klein-Parker H, Worth A, Poon P. Radial sclerosing lesions of the breast: mammographic and pathologic correlation. Can Assoc Radiol J 1999;50:370-5.
4. Bonzanini M, Gilioli E, Brancato B, Pellegrini M, Mauri MF, Dalla Palma P. Cytologic features of 22 radial scar/complex sclerosing lesions of the breast, three of which associated with carcinoma: clinical, mammographic, and histologic correlation. Diagn Cytopathol 1997;17:353-62.
5. Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Rodriguez-Soto J, Marzoni FA Jr, Finkelstein SI, Shepard MJ. Stereotactic, automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: false-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. Radiology 1999;210:799-805.
6. Sloane JP, Mayers MM. Carcinoma and atypical hyperplasia in radial scars and complex sclerosing lesions: importance of lesion size and patient age. Histopathology 1993;23:225-31.
7. King TA, Scharfenberg JC, Smetherman DH, Farkas EA, Bolton JS, Fuhrman GM. A better understanding of the term radial scar. Am J Surg 2000;180:428-32.
8. Cawson JN, Malara F, Kavanagh A, Hill P, Balasubramanium G, Henderson M. Fourteen-gauge needle core biopsy of mammographically evident radial scars: is excision necessary? Cancer 2003;97:345-51.
9. Philpotts LE, Shaheen NA, Jain KS, Carter D, Lee CH. Uncommon high-risk lesions of the breast diagnosed at stereotactic core-needle biopsy: clinical importance. Radiology 2000;216:831-7.
10. Tabar L, Dean PB. Teaching atlas of mammography. 3rd ed. New York: Theime; 2001. p 93-6.
11. Wellings SR, Alpers CE. Subgross pathologic features and incidence of radial scars in the breast. Hum Pathol 1984;15:475-9.
12. Nielsen M, Jensen J, Andersen JA. An autopsy study of radial scar in the female breast. Histopathology 1985;9:287-95.
13. Ciatto S, Morrone D, Catarzi S. Radial scars of the breast: review of 38 consecutive mammographic diagnoses. Radiology 1993;187:757-60.
14. Orel SG, Evers K, Yeh IT, Troupin RH. Radial scar with microcalcifications: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1992;183:479-82.
15. Adler DD, Helvie MA, Oberman HA, Ikeda DM, Bhan AO. Radial sclerosing lesion of the breast: mammographic features. Radiology 1990;176:737-40.
16. Shetty MK. Radial scars of the breast: sonographic findings. Ultrasound Q 2002;18:203-7.
17. Finlay ME, Liston JE, Lunt LG, Young JR. Assessment of the role of ultrasound in the differentiation of radial scars and stellate carcinomas of the breast. Clin Radiol 1994;49:52-5.
18. Cohen MA, Sferlazza SJ. Role of sonography in evaluation of radial scars of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:1075-8.
19. Brenner RJ, Jackman RJ, Parker SH, Evans WP 3rd, Philpotts L, Deutch BM, et al. Percutaneous core needle biopsy of radial scars of the breast: when is excision necessary? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:1179-84.
20. O'Driscoll D, Britton P, Bobrow L, Wishart GC, Sinnatamby R, Warren R. Lobular carcinoma in situ on core biopsy - what is the clinical significance? Clin Radiol 2001;56:216-20.
21. Irfan K, Brem RF. Surgical and mammographic follow-up of papillary lesions and atypical lobular hyperplasia diagnosed with stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy. Breast J 2002;8:230-3.
22. Bauer VP, Ditkoff BA, Schnabel F, Brenin D, El-Tamer M, Smith S. The management of lobular neoplasia identified on percutaneous core breast biopsy. Breast J 2003;9:4-9.
23. Philpotts LE, Lee CH, Horvath LJ, Lange RC, Carter D, Tocino I. Underestimation of breast cancer with 11-guage vacuum suction biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgentol 2000;175:1047-50.
24. Rao A, Parker S, Ratzer E, Stephens J, Fenoglio M. Atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast diagnosed by 11-guage directional vacuum-assisted biopsy. Am J Surg 2002;184:534-7.
25. Maganini RO, Klem DA, Huston BJ, Bruner ES, Jacob HK. Upgrade rate of core biopsy-determined atypical ductal hyperplasia by open excisional biopsy. Am J Surg 2001;182:355-8.
26. Foster MC, Helvie MA, Gregory NE, Rebner M, Nees AV, Paramagul C. Lobular carcinoma in situ or atypical lobular hyperplasia at core-needle biopsy: is excisional biopsy necessary? Radiology 2004;231:813-9.
27. Berg WA, Mrose HE, Ioffe OB. Atypical lobular hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situe at core-needle breast biopsy. Radiology 2001;218:503-9.
28. Philpotts LE, Shaheen NA, Carter D, Lange RC, Lee CH. Comparison of rebiopsy rates after stereotactic core needle biopsy of the breast with 11-gauge vacuum suction probe versus 14-guage needle and automated gun. AJR Am J Roentgentol 1999;172:683-7.
29. Lomoschitz FM, Helbich TH, Rudas M, Pfarl G, Linnau KF, Stadler A, Jackman RJ. Stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: influence of number of specimens on diagnostic accuracy. Radiology 2004;232:897-903.
30. Liberman L, Kaplan JB, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Menell JH, Dershaw DD. To excise or to sample the mammographic target: what is the goal of stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:679-83.