Involving mental health service users in quality assurance

Health Expectations

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 98-109

  Weinstein, Jenny ^a  

^a LONDON SOUTH BANK UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Day centres; Mental health; Quality assurance; User involvement

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; COOPERATION; DAY CARE; DOCUMENT EXAMINATION; EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HEALTH SERVICE DEVELOPMENT; HUMAN; MANAGEMENT STYLE; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; STANDARD; VOLUNTEER;

ADULT; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATE MEDICINE;

EID: 33646687512     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: 13697625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00377.x     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Wilkes J. Quality assurance. In : Pierce R, Weinstein J eds Innovative Education and Training for Care Professionals: A Provider's Guide. London, UK : Jessica Kingsley, 2000 : 111 120.
2. DTI. The Original Quality Gurus. Available at: http://www.dti.gov/ quality/gurus, accessed on May 2005.
3. Born G. Process Management to Quality Improvement. New York, USA : Wiley, 1994.
4. Asher M. Managing Quality in the Service Sector. London, UK : Kogan Page, 1996.
5. European Forum for Quality Management (EFQM). The Excellence Model. Available at: http://www.efqm.org, accessed on May 2005.
6. Investors in People. Available at: http://www.investorsinpeople.org, accessed on May 2005.
7. Charities Evaluation Service. Practical Quality Assurance System for Small Organisations (PQASSO). Available at: http://www.ces-vol.org.uk, accessed on May 2005.
8. Peters T. The Pursuit of WOW! Every Person's Guide to Topsy-turvy Times. London, UK : Macmillan, 1995.
9. Barclay J, Abdy M. Quality Matters: Funders and Quality in the Voluntary Sector. London, UK : NCVO, 2001.
10. Home Office Active Community Unit. Compact on Relations between Government and the Voluntary and Community Sector in England. London, UK : Home Office Active Community Unit, 1998.
11. Quality Standards Task Group. Improving our Performance: A Strategy for the Voluntary and Community Sector. London, UK : NCVO, 2004.
12. Quality Standards Task Group. Sharing Learning QSTG 1997-2004. London, UK : NCVO, 2004.
13. CSCI. Extract from web site on Inspection of Social Care Services. Available at: http://www.csci.org.uk, accessed on May 2005.
14. Everett B. Something is happening: the contemporary consumer and psychiatric survivor movement in historical context. The Journal of Mind and Behaviour, 1994 15 : 55 70.
15. Whittington C. Collaboration and partnership in context. In : Weinstein J, Whittington C, Leiba T eds Collaboration in Social Work Practice. London, UK : Jessica Kingsley, 2003 : 13 38.
16. Barnes M, Bowls R. Taking over the Asylum. London, UK : Palgrave, 2001.
17. DH. The National Service Framework for Mental Health. London, UK : Department of Health, 1999.
18. Bristol MIND. User Focused Study of In-patient Services in 3 Bristol Hospitals. Bristol, UK : Bristol MIND, 2004.
19. Leiba T, Weinstein J. Who are the participants in the collaborative process and what makes collaboration succeed or fail In : Weinstein J, Whittington C, Leiba T eds Collaboration in Social Work Practice. London, UK : Jessica Kingsley, 2003 : 63 82.
20. Crawford M, Aldridge T, Bhui K et al. User involvement in the planning and delivery of mental health services: a cross-sectional survey of service users and providers. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 2003 107 : 410 414.
21. Peck E, Gulliver P, Towel D. Information consultation or control: user involvement in mental health services in England at the turn of the century. Journal of Mental Health, 2002 11 : 441 451.
22. Robert G, Hardacre J, Locock L, Bate P, Glasby J. Redesigning mental health services: lessons on user involvement from the mental health collaborative. Health Expectations, 2003 6 : 60 71.
23. Poulton B. User involvement in identifying health needs and shaping and evaluating services: is it being realized Journal of Advanced Nursing, 1999 30 : 1289 1296.
24. Crawford MJ, Rutter D. Are the views of mental health user groups representative of those of 'ordinary' patients? A cross-sectional survey of service users and providers. Journal of Mental Health, 2004 13 : 561 568.
25. Crepaz-Keay D, Binns C, Wilson E. Dancing with Angels. London, UK : CCETSW, 1997.
26. Harding T, Oldman H. Involving Service Users and Carers in Local Services. London, UK : National Institute of Social Work, 1996.
27. Beresford P, Wallcroft J. Psychiatric system survivors and emancipatory research issues, overlaps and differences. In : Barnes C, Mercer G eds Doing Disability Research. Leeds : Disability Press, 1997. 26 33.
28. Telford R, Faulkner A. Learning about service user involvement in mental health research. Journal of Mental Health, 2004 13 : 549 559.
29. Godfrey M. More than 'involvement': how commissioning user interviewers in the research process begins to change the balance of power. Practice, 2004 16 : 223 231.
30. Beeforth M, Conlan E, Graley R. Have we Got Views for you: User Evaluation of Case Management, 1994. London, UK : The Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health, 1994.
31. Bloor M. Addressing social problems through qualitative research. In : Silverman D ed. Qualitative Research, Theory Method and Practice. London, UK : Sage, 1998 : 21.
32. O'Brien R. An Overview of the Methodological Approach of Action Research 1997. Available at: http://www.web.net/robrien/papers/arfinahtm, accessed on May 2005.
33. Shaw I. Just inquiry? Research and evaluation for service users. In : Kemshall H, Littlechild R eds User Involvement and Participation in Social Care. London, UK : Jessica Kingsley, 2000 : 29 44.
34. Edwards C, Staniszewska S. Accessing the user's perspective. Health and Social Care in the Community, 2000 8 : 417 428.
35. Pilgim D. Protest and co-option - the voice of mental health service users. In : Bell A, Lindley P eds Beyond the Water Towers: The Unfinished Revolution in Mental Health Services 1985-2005. London, UK : Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health, 2005 23.
36. Williams B, Coyle J, Healy D. The meaning of patient satisfaction: an exploration of high reported levels. Social Science and Medicine, 1998 47 : 1351 1359.
37. User Focused Monitoring Network. Doing it for Real: a Guide to Setting up and Undertaking a User Focused Monitoring Project. London, UK : Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health, 2003. Available at: http://www.scmh.org.uk, accessed on May 2005.
38. Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health. User-focused Monitoring 2005. Available at: http://www.scmh.org.uk, accessed on May 2005.
39. Pilgrim D, Waldron L. User involvement in mental health service development: how far can it go Journal of Mental Health, 1998 7 : 95 104.
40. Simpson EL, Barkham M, Gilbody S, House A. Involving service users as researchers for the evaluation of adult statutory mental health services. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2003 CD004810 (DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004810).
41. Joseph Rowntree Findings. Increasing User Involvement in Voluntary Organizations 2003. Available at: http://www.jrf.org.uk, accessed on October 2005.
42. DOH. The Care Programme Approach for People with a Mental Illness Referred to the Psychiatric Services HC 23 LASSL. London, UK : Department of Health, 1990.
43. McDermott G. The Care Programme Approach: a patient perspective. Mentally Ill in the Community, 1998 3 : 47 63.
44. Social Exclusion Unit. Action on Mental Health: A Guide to Promoting Social Inclusion. London, UK : Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, 2004. Available at: http://www.socialexclusion.gov.uk, accessed on May 2005.
45. Rose D, Fleischmann P, Tonkiss F, Campbell P, Wykes T. Review of the Literature: User and Carer Involvement in Change Management in a Mental Health Context. Report to NHS Service Delivery and Organisation Research and Development Programme 2003. London, UK : NHS SDO Quoted in Social Care Institute for Excellence. Has service user participation made a difference to social care services 2005. Available at: http://www.scie.org.uk, accessed on October 2005.
46. The Ohio State University College of Dentistry. Principles of Continuous Quality Improvement (PQI): A Shift from a Focus on the End Product or Service to Process 2005 : Available at: http://www.dent.ohio-state.edu/cqm/TeamMembers/ principles_of_continuous_quality..., accessed on April 2005.