Involving service users as researchers for the evaluation of adult statutory mental health services

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Volumn 2013, Issue 9, 2013, Pages

  Simpson, Emma L ^a   Barkham, Michael ^b   Gilbody, Simon ^c   House, Allan ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETRACTED ARTICLE;

EID: 85041708146     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1469493X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004810.pub2     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Berger E, Carter A, Casey D, Litchefield L. What's happening with consumer participation?. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Mental Health Nursing 1996;5(3):131-5. [MEDLINE: Service planning and delivery. User involvement technologies implemented in region.]
2. Campbell J. How consumers/survivors are evaluating the quality of psychiatric care. Evaluation Review 1997;21(3):357-63. [MEDLINE: Discussion of user involvement in research.]
3. Chamberlain A. Working towards user-led services through a mental health forum. Community Health Action 1993;8(Spring):6-8. [MEDLINE: Service planning. Stakeholder negotiation. Mental health forum consisting almost exclusively of users with representatives on planning groups.]
4. Clark CC, Scott EA, Krupa T. Involving clients in programme evaluation and research: a new methodology for occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 1993;60(4):192-9. [MEDLINE: Discusses user involvement in service evaluation research.]
5. Clarke M, Oxman AD, editors. Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook 4.2.0. In: The Cochrane Library. The Cochrane Collaboration. Oxford: Update Software; 2003, issue 2.
6. Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Review Group. Data collection checklist. http://www.epoc.uottawa.ca/checklist2002.doc (accessed November 2003).
7. Cochrane Non-Randomised Studies Methods Group. Guidelines on non-randomised studies in Cochrane reviews. http://www.cochrane.dk/nrsmg/guidelines.htm (accessed December 2003).
8. Crawford MJ, Rutter D, Manley C, Weaver T, Bhui K, Fulop N, Tyrer P. Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. BMJ 2002;325:1263-4.
9. Department of Health. Patient and public involvement in the new NHS. http://www.doh.gov.uk/pub/docs/doh/ppinvolvement.pdf. London: Department of Health, 1999 (accessed Nov 2003).
10. Department of Health. Involving patients and the public in healthcare: a discussion document. http://www.doh.gov.uk/pdfs/involvingpatients.pdf. Department of Health, 2001 (accessed Nov 2003).
11. Dickersin K, Scherer R, Lefebvre C. Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. BMJ 1994;309:1286-91.
12. Eisen SV, Shaul JA, Clarridge B, Nelson D, Spink J, Cleary PD. Development of a consumer survey for behavioral health services. Psychiatric Services 1999;50(6):793-8. [MEDLINE: Service evaluation research. Involvement in research design. User input into survey design.]
13. Evans CJ, McGaha AC. A survey of mental health consumers' and family members' involvement in advocacy. Community Mental Health Journal 1998;34(6):615-23. [MEDLINE: Service evaluation research. User and carer involvement in questionnaire design, distribution and collection.]
14. Everett B. Participation or Exploitation? Consumers and psychiatric survivors as partners in planning mental health services. International Journal of Mental Health 1998;27(1):80-97.
15. Ford R, Rose D. Mental health. Heads and tales. Health Service Journal 1997;107(5578):28-9. [MEDLINE: Service evaluation research. Users as interviewers. Users interviewing users about mental health services across several sites. Also see Rose, D., R. Ford, et al. (1998), and Rose, D. (2001).]
16. Hickey G, Kipping C. Exploring the concept of user involvement in mental health through a participation continuum. Journal of Clinical Nursing 1998;7(1):83-8.
17. Mental Health Task Force User Group, eds Graley R, Nettle M, Wallcraft J. Building on experience: a training pack for mental health service users working as trainers, speakers and workshop facilitators. Heywood: Department of Health, 1994.
18. Morris J, Lindow V. User participation in community care services. London/Leeds: Department of Health. Community Care Support Force, 1993.
19. Newcastle Community Health Council, North Tyneside Community Health Council. Can they make a difference? A study of user involvement in mental health services. Newcastle upon Tyne: Newcastle Community Health Council; North Tyneside Community Health Council, 1998. [MEDLINE: Survey of user involvement, and guidelines for involving users.]
20. Office for Public Management, Joseph Rowntree Foundation. From margin to mainstream. Initiatives in user and carer involvement: a survey of local authorities. London: Office for Public Management, 1993. [MEDLINE: Survey of user involvement.]
21. Philip G, Stewart J. Involving mental health service users in evaluating service quality. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance 1999;12(5):199-209. [MEDLINE: Service evaluation. User involvement in research design. User involvement in questionnaire design.]
22. Poulton BC. User involvement in identifying health needs and shaping and evaluating services: is it being realised?. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1999;30(6):1289-96.
23. Ramon S. Participative mental health research: users and professional researchers working together. Mental Health Care & Learning Disabilities 2000;3(7):224-8. [MEDLINE: Service evaluation research. Involvement in research design. Co-operative research between users and academic research establishments.]
24. Robinson K, Dickersin K. Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of controlled trials using PubMed. International Journal of Epidemiology 2002;31:150-3.
25. Townsend E, Birch DE, Langley J, Langille L. Participatory research in a mental health clubhouse. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research 2000;20(1):18-44.