Identification of 3D shape from texture and motion across the visual field

Journal of Vision

Volumn 6, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 543-553

  Gurnsey, Rick ^a   Poirier, Frédéric J A M ^b   Bluett, Patricia ^a   Leibov, Laurie ^a  

^a Civil and Environmental Engineering   (Canada)

^b YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

3D structure; Cortical magnification; Eccentricity; Motion; Size scaling; Texture

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FORCED CHOICE METHOD; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERIPHERAL VISION; PSYCHOMETRY; RETINA FOVEA; RETINA IMAGE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SURFACE PROPERTY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 33646686801     PISSN: 15347362     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/6.5.1     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Barrett, B. T., Morrill, P., & Whitaker, D. (2000). Compound grating discrimination in extrafoveal and amblyopic vision. Experimental Brain Research, 131, 225-235. [PubMed]
2. Barrett, B. T., Whitaker, D., McGraw, P. V., & Herbert, A. M. (1999). Discriminating mirror symmetry in foveal and extra-foveal vision. Vision Research, 39, 3737-3744. [PubMed]
3. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436. [PubMed]
4. Cowey, A., & Rolls, E. T. (1974). Human cortical magnification factor and its relation to visual acuity. Experimental Brain Research, 21, 447-454. [PubMed]
5. Dougherty, R. F., Koch, V. M., Brewer, A. A., Fischer, B., Modersitzki, J., & Wandell, B. A. (2003). Visual field representations and locations of visual areas V1/2/3 in human visual cortex. Journal of Vision, 3(10), 586-598, http://journalofvision.org/3/10/1/, doi:10.1167/ 3.10.1. [PubMed] [Article]
6. Gibson, L. A., Sadr, J., Troje, N. F., & Nakayama, K. (2005). Perception of biological motion at varying eccentricity [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 5(8), 16a, http://journalofvision.org/5/8/16/, doi:10.1167/ 5.8.16.
7. Hess, R. F., & Dakin, S. C. (1997). Absence of contour linking in peripheral vision. Nature, 390, 602-604. [PubMed]
8. Ikeda, H., Blake, R., & Watanabe, K. (2005). Eccentric perception of biological motion is unscalably poor. Vision Research, 45, 1935-1943. [PubMed]
9. Johansson, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception and Psychophysics, 14, 201-211.
10. Koenderink, J. J., van Doorn, A. J., & Kappers, A. M. (1992). Surface perception in pictures. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 487-496. [PubMed]
11. Koenderink, J. J., van Doorn, A. J., Kappers, A. M., & Todd, J. T. (2001). Ambiguity and the 'mental eye' in pictorial relief. Perception, 30, 431-448. [PubMed]
12. Latham, K., & Whitaker, D. (1996). Relative roles of resolution and spatial interference in foveal and peripheral vision. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 16, 49-57. [PubMed]
13. Levi, D. M., Klein, S. A., & Aitsebaomo, A. P. (1985). Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification. Vision Research, 25, 963-977. [PubMed]
14. Levi, D. M., & Waugh, S. J. (1994). Spatial scale shifts in peripheral vernier acuity. Vision Research, 34, 2215-2238. [PubMed]
15. Mäkelä, P., Whitaker, D., & Rovamo, J. (1993). Modelling of orientation discrimination across the visual field. Vision Research, 33, 723-730. [PubMed]
16. Melmoth, D. R., Kukkonen, H. T., Mäkelä, P. K., & Rovamo, J. M. (2000). The effect of contrast and size scaling on face perception in foveal and extrafoveal vision. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 41, 2811-2819. [PubMed] [Article]
17. Melmoth, D. R., & Rovamo, J. M. (2003). Scaling of letter size and contrast equalizes perception across eccentricities and set sizes. Vision Research, 43, 769-777. [PubMed]
18. Morrone, M. C., Burr, D. C., & Spinelli, D. (1989). Discrimination of spatial phase in central and peripheral vision. Vision Research, 29, 433-445. [PubMed]
19. Nugent, A. K., Keswani, R. N., Woods, R. L., & Peli, E. (2003). Contour integration in peripheral vision reduces gradually with eccentricity. Vision Research, 43, 2427-2437. [PubMed]
20. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442. [PubMed]
21. Poirier, F. J., & Gurnsey, R. (2002). Two eccentricity-dependent limitations on subjective contour discrimination. Vision Research, 42, 227-238. [PubMed]
22. Poirier, F. J., & Gurnsey, R. (2005). Non-monotomic changes in performance with eccentricity modeled by multiple eccentricity-dependent limitations. Vision Research, 45, 2436-2448. [PubMed]
23. Rentschler, I., & Treutwein, B. (1985). Loss of spatial phase relationships in extrafoveal vision. Nature, 313, 308-310. [PubMed]
24. Rovamo, J., & Virsu, V. (1979). An estimation and application of the human cortical magnification factor. Experimental Brain Research, 37, 495-510. [PubMed]
25. Saarinen, J. (1988). Detection of mirror symmetry in random dot patterns at different eccentricities. Vision Research, 28, 755-759. [PubMed]
26. Sally, S., & Gurnsey, R. (2001). Symmetry detection across the visual field. Spatial Vision, 14, 217-234. [PubMed]
27. Sally, S. L., & Gurnsey, R. (2003). Orientation discrimination in foveal and extra-foveal vision: Effects of stimulus bandwidth and contrast. Vision Research, 43, 1375-1385. [PubMed]
28. Sally, S. L., & Gurnsey, R. (2004). Orientation discrimination across the visual field: Matching perceived contrast near threshold. Vision Research, 44, 2719-2727. [PubMed]
29. Scobey, R. P. (1982). Human visual orientation discrimination. Journal of Neurophysiology, 48, 18-26. [PubMed]
30. Sereno, M. I., Dale, A. M., Reppas, J. B., Kwong, K. K., Belliveau, J. W., Brady, T. J., et al. (1995). Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Science, 268, 889-893. [PubMed]
31. Slotnick, S. D., Klein, S. A., Carney, T. & Sutter, E. E. (2001). Electrophysiological estimate of human cortical magnification. Clinical Neurophysiology, 112, 1349-1356. [PubMed]
32. Sperling, G., Dosher, B. A., & Landy, M. S. (1990). How to study the kinetic depth effect experimentally. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 445-450. [PubMed]
33. Strasburger, H., Harvey, L. O., Jr., & Rentschler, I. (1991). Contrast thresholds for identification of numeric characters in direct and eccentric view. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 495-508. [PubMed]
34. Strasburger, H., & Rentschler, I. (1996). Contrast-dependent dissociation of visual recognition and detection fields. European Journal of Neuroscience, 8, 1787-1791. [PubMed]
35. Strasburger, H., Rentschler, I., & Harvey, L. O., Jr. (1994). Cortical magnification theory fails to predict visual recognition. European Journal of Neuroscience, 6, 1583-1587. [PubMed]
36. Thibos, L. N., Still, D. L., & Bradley, A. (1996). Characterization of spatial aliasing and contrast sensitivity in peripheral vision. Vision Research, 36, 249-258. [PubMed]
37. Todd, J. T. (2004). The visual perception of 3D shape. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 115-121. [PubMed]
38. Todd, J. T., Koenderink, J. J., van Doorn, A. J., & Kappers, A. M. (1996). Effects of changing viewing conditions on the perceived structure of smoothly curved surfaces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 695-706. [PubMed]
39. Todd, J. T., Oomes, A. H., Koenderink, J. J., & Kappers, A. M. (2004). The perception of doubly curved surfaces from anisotropic textures. Psychological Science, 15, 40-46. [PubMed]
40. van de Grind W. A., Koenderink, J. J., & van Doorn, A. J. (1987). Influence of contrast on foveal and peripheral detection of coherent motion in moving random-dot patterns. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics and Image Science, 4, 1643-1652. [PubMed]
41. Wallach, H., & O'Connell, D. N. (1953) The kinetic depth effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 205-217. [PubMed]
42. Watson, A. B. (1987). Estimation of local spatial scale. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics and Image Science, 4, 1579-1582. [PubMed]
43. Whitaker, D., Latham, K., Mäkelä, P., & Rovamo, J. (1993). Detection and discrimination of curvature in foveal and peripheral vision. Vision Research, 33, 2215-2224. [PubMed]
44. Whitaker, D., Mäkelä, P., Rovamo, J., & Latham, K. (1992). The influence of eccentricity on position and movement acuities as revealed by spatial scaling. Vision Research, 32, 1913-1930. [PubMed]
45. Whitaker, D., Rovamo, J., MacVeigh, D., & Mäkelä, P. (1992). Spatial scaling of vernier acuity tasks. Vision Research, 32, 1481-1491. [PubMed]
46. Yager, D., & Davis, E. T. (1987). Variations of visual functions across the visual field: Introduction [Abstract]. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics and Image Science, 4, 1478.