Useful models for simulating policies to induce technological change

Energy Policy

Volumn 34, Issue 15, 2006, Pages 2038-2047

  Rivers, Nic ^a   Jaccard, Mark ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Endogenous technical change; Hybrid model

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COSTS; ECONOMICS; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; REGULATORY COMPLIANCE;

ENDOGENOUS TECHNICAL CHANGE; ENERGY-ECONOMY MODELS; HYBRID MODEL; SIMULATING POLICIES;

ENERGY POLICY;

ECONOMIC POLICY; ENERGY POLICY; NUMERICAL MODEL; TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE;

EID: 33646598687     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2005.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bohringer C. The synthesis of bottom-up and top-down in energy policy modelling. Energy Economics 20 3 (1998) 233-248
2. Brown M., Levine M., Romm J., Rosenfeld A., and Koomey J. Engineering-economic studies of energy technologies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions: opportunities and challenges. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 23 (1998) 233-248
3. De Groot H.L.F., Verhoef E.T., and Nijkamp P. Energy saving by firms: decision making, barriers, and policies. Energy Economics 23 6 (2001) 717-740
4. Dixit A.K., and Pindyck R.S. Investment under Uncertainty (1994), Princeton University Press, Princeton
5. Frei C., Haldi P.-A., and Sarlos G. Dynamic formulation of a top-down and bottom-up merging energy policy model. Energy Policy 31 (2003) 1017-1031
6. Grubb M., Kohler I., and Anderson D. Induced technical change in energy and environmental modeling: analytical approaches and policy implications. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 27 (2002) 271-308
7. Harris J., Anderson J., and Shafron W. Investment in energy efficiency: a survey of Australian firms. Energy Policy 28 12 (2000) 867-876
8. Hasset K., and Metcalf G. Energy conservation investments: do consumers discount the future correctly?. Energy Policy 21 6 (1994) 710-716
9. Hautcsh N., and Klotz S. Estimating the neighborhood influence on decision makers: theory and an application on the analysis of innovation decisions. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 52 1 (2002) 97-113
10. Interlaboratory Working Group, 2000. Scenarios for a Clean Energy Future. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA. ORNL/CON-476 and LBNL-44029.
11. 2 emission reduction costs in the residential sector: behavioural parameters in a bottom-up simulation model. The Energy Journal 17 4 (1996) 107-134
12. Jaccard M., Nyboer J., Bataille C., and Sadownik B. Modeling the cost of climate policy: distinguishing between alternative cost definitions and long-run cost dynamics. The Energy Journal 24 1 (2003) 49-73
13. Jacobsen H.K. Integrating the bottom-up and top-down approach to energy-economy modelling: the case of Denmark. Energy Economics 20 4 (1998) 443-461
14. Koopmans C.C., and te Velde D.W. Bridging the energy efficiency gap: using bottom-up information in a top-down energy demand model. Energy Economics 23 1 (2001) 57-75
15. McDonald A., and Schrattenholzer L. Learning rates for energy technologies. Energy Policy 29 (2001) 255-261
16. Morris S., Goldstein G., and Fthenakis V. NEMS and MARKAL-MACRO models for energy-environmental-economic analysis: a comparison of the electricity and carbon reduction projections. Environmental Modelling and Assessment 17 (2002) 207-216
17. Norton B., Costanza R., and Bishop R.C. The evolution of preferences: why 'sovereign' preferences may not lead to sustainable policies and what to do about it. Ecological Economics 24 2-3 (1998) 193-211
18. Rivers N., and Jaccard M. Combining top-down and bottom-up approaches to energy-economy modelling using discrete choice methods. The Energy Journal 26 1 (2005) 83-106
19. Sanstad A., DeCanio S., Boyd G., and Koomey J. Estimating bounds on the economy-wide effects of the CEF policy scenarios. Energy Policy 29 (2001) 1299-1311
20. Sassone P., and Martucci M. Industrial energy conservation: the reasons behind the decisions. Energy 9 5 (1984)
21. Train K. Discount rates in consumers' energy related decisions: a review of the literature. Energy: The International Journal 10 12 (1985) 1243-1253
22. Weyant J., and Hill J. Introduction and overview (special issue on the costs of the Kyoto Protocol: a multi-model evaluation. The Energy Journal (1999) vii-xliv