Engineering-economic studies of energy technologies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions: Opportunities and Challenges

Annual Review of Energy and the Environment

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 287-385

  Brown, Marilyn A ^a   Levine, Mark D ^b   Romm, Joseph P ^c   Rosenfeld, Arthur H ^c   Koomey, Jonathan G ^b  

^a OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c U S DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Climate change; Energy efficiency; Low carbon technologies

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS; ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENERGY POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GAS EMISSIONS; GREENHOUSE EFFECT;

LOW CARBON TECHNOLOGY;

ENERGY EFFICIENCY;

EID: 0032317877     PISSN: 10563466     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.energy.23.1.287     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Eizenstat SE. 1998. Statement before the Subcommittee on Energy and Power, House Commerce Committee, March 4. http: www.house.gov/commerce
2. Off. Technol. Assess. (OTA) US Congr. 1991. Changing by Degrees: Steps to Reduce Greenhouse Gases, OTA-0-482. Washington, DC: US Gov. Print. Off.
3. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1992. Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming: Mitigation, Adaptation, and the Science Base. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Sci.
4. Interlaboratory Working Group. 1997. Scenarios of U.S. Carbon Reductions: Potential Impacts of Energy-Efficient and Low-Carbon Technologies by 2010 and Beyond. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley Natl. Lab.
5. 2 Emissions in the United States: An Analysis of Options for 2005 and 2010. Boston, MA: Tellus Inst.
6. Alliance to Save Energy, Am. Counc. Energy-Effic. Econ., Nat Resour. Def. Counc., Tellus Inst., Union Concern. Sci. 1997. Energy Innovations: A Prosperous Path to a Clean Environment. Washington, DC: Alliance to Save Energy
7. Alliance to Save Energy, Am. Counc. Energy-Effic. Econ., Nat. Resour. Def. Counc., Union Concern. Sci. 1991. America's Energy Choices: Investing in a Strong Economy and a Clean Environment. Cambridge, MA: Union Concern. Sci.
8. Intergov. Panel Clim. Change (IPCC). 1996. Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change Contribution of Working Group I to the Second Assessment Report. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
9. Intergov. Panel Clim. Change (IPCC). 1995. Climate Change 1995: IPCC Second Assessment Report, Synthesis of Scientific and Technical Information. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press. http://www.ipcc.ch
10. Energy Inf. Admin. 1996. Annual Energy Review, DOE/EIA-0384(95). Washington, DC: US Dep. Energy
11. Jaccard M, Montgomery WD. 1996. Costs of reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the USA and Canada. Energy Policy 24(10/11):889-98
12. Repetto R, Austin D. 1997. The Costs of Climate Protection: A Guide for the Perplexed. Washington, DC: World Resour. Inst
13. US Dep. Energy. 1995. Energy Conservation Trends, DOE/PO-0034. Washington, DC: US Dep. Energy, Off. Policy
14. Hirst E, Marlay R, Greene D, Barnes R. 1983. Recent changes in U.S. energy consumption: What happened and why. Annu. Energv Rev. 8:193-245
15. Hirst E, Brown MA. 1990. Closing the efficiency gap: barriers to the efficient use of energy. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 3:267-81
16. Ross M. 1990. Capital budgeting practices of twelve large manufacturers. In Advances in Business Financial Management, ed. Philip Cooley, pp. 157-70. Chicago: Dryden
17. Brown MA. 1997. Energy-efficient buildings: Does the marketplace work? In Proc. 24th Annu. Ill. Energy Conf., pp. 233-55. Chicago: Univ. Ill. Press
18. Greene DL. 1998. Why CAFE worked? Energy Policy. In press
19. Levine MD, Koomey JG, McMahon JE, Sanstad A, Hirst E. 1995. Energy efficiency policy and market failures. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 20:535-55
20. Greening LA, Sanstad AH, McMahon JE. 1997. Effects of appliance standards on product price and attributes: an hedonic pricing model. J. Regul. Econ. 11(2):181-94
21. Energy Inf. Admin. 1996. Annual Energy Outlook 1997: With Projections to 2105, DOE/EIA-0383(97). Washington, DC: US Dep. Energy
22. Energy Inf. Admin. 1996. Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in the United States 1995. DOE/EIA-0573(95). Washington, DC: US Dep. Energy
23. Koomey J, Sanstad HE, Shown LJ. 1996. Energy-efficiency lighting: market data, market imperfections, and policy success. Contemp. Econ. Policy 14(3):98-111
24. Meier A, Whittier J. 1983. Consumer discount rates implied by purchases of energy-efficient refrigerators. Energy 8(12):957-62
25. US Dep. Energy, Off. Policy Int. Affairs. 1996. Policies and Measures for Reducing Energy Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions. DOE/PO-0047. Washington, DC: US Dep. Energy
26. Hausman JA. 1979. Individual discount rates and the purchase and utilization of energy-using durables. Bell J. Econ. 10(1):33
27. Ruderman H, Levine MD, McMahon JE. 1987. The behavior of the market for energy efficiency in residential appliances including heating and cooling equipment. Energy J. 8(1):101-23
28. Lovins A. 1992 Energy-Efficient Buildings: Institutional Barriers and Opportunities. Boulder, CO: Strateg. Issues Pap. E-Source
29. Levine MD, Sonnenblick R. 1994. On the assessment of utility demand-side management programs. Energy Policy 22(10):848-56
30. Ross M, Thimmapuram P, Fisher, Maciorowski W. 1993. Long-Term Industrial Energy Forecasting(LIEF) Model(18-Sector Version), ANL/EAIS/TM-95. Argonne, IL: Argonne Natl. Lab.
31. Electr. Power Res. Inst. 1997. Renewable Energv Technology Characterizations. TR-109496. Palo Alto, CA: Electr. Power Res. Inst.
32. Rubin ES, Cooper RN, Frosch RA, Lee TH, Marland G, et al. 1992. Realistic mitigation options for global warming. Science 257:148-49, 261-66
33. Natl. Lab. Dir. 1997. Technology Opportunities to Reduce U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions. http://www.ornl.gov/climate-change
34. Burtraw D, Toman M. 1997. The Benefits of Reduced Air Pollutants in the U.S. from Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Policies. Washington, DC: Resour. Future
35. Mills E, Rosenfeld AH. 1994. Non-energy benefits as a motivation for making energy-efficiency improvements. Presented at Am. Counc. Energy-Effic. Econ. (ACEEE) 1994 Summ. Study Energy Effic. Build., Asilomar, CA
36. Energy Inf. Admin. 1998. Monthly Energy Review, DOE/EIA-0035(98/03). Washington, DC: US Dep. Energy
37. Energy Inf. Admin. 1998. Annual Energy Outlook 1998: With Projections to 2105. DOE/EIA-0383(98). Washington, DC: US Dep. Energy
38. Energy Inf. Admin. 1995. Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in the United States, 1987-1994, DOE/EIA-0573(87-94). Washington, DC: US Dep. Energy
39. Brown RE. 1993. Estimates of the achievable potential for electricity efficiency in U.S. residences. MS thesis. Univ. Calif., Berkeley
40. Brown RE. 1994. Estimates of the achievable potential for electricity efficiency improvements in U.S. residences. In Proc. 1994 ACEEE Summ. Study Energy Effic. Build., 7:55. Washington, DC: Am. Counc. Energy-Effic. Econ.
41. Sanchez M. 1997. Miscellaneous electricity use in U.S. residences. MS thesis. Univ. Calif., Berkeley
42. Sanchez MC, Koomey JG, Moezzi MM, Meier AK, Huber W. 1998. Miscellaneous electricity use in U.S. homes: historical decomposition and future trends. Energy Policy. In press
43. Berman S. 1976. Electricity Energy Consumption in California, LBL UCID-3847. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley Natl. Lab.
44. US Dep. Energy, Seer. Energy Advis. Board (DOE/SEAB). 1995. Task Force on Strategic Energy Research and Development, Annex 3. Washington, DC: US Dep. Energy
45. Vineyard E. 1998. Fridge of the future: designing a l-kWh/day domestic refrigerator-freezer. To be presented at Am. Counc. Energy-Effic. Econ. (ACEEE) 1998 Summ. Study Energy Effic. Build., Asilomar, CA
46. Romm JJ. 1994. Lean and Clean Management. New York: Kodansha Am.
47. Gas Res. Inst. 1994. Light Duty Vehicle Full Fuel Cycle Emissions Analysis. Arlington, VA: Gas Res. Inst.
48. Onsite Energy. 1997. Gas Turbine Environmental Analysis and Policy Considerations. Carlsbad, CA: Onsite Energy Corp.
49. Major G. 1995. Learning from Experiences With Small-Scate Cogeneration. Sittard, The Netherlands: Cent. Anal. Dissem. Demonstr. Energy Technol.
50. Major W. 1997. Basis for 60 GW of Remaining Cogeneration Potential in the Industrial Sector. Carlsbad, CA: Onsite Energy Corp.
51. Brent R, Davidson K. 1996. Market outlook and application for industrial gas turbines in distributed generation. Presented at 40th Annu. Eng. Oper. Workshop, Am. Public Power Assoc., Salt Lake City, UT, Mar. 25-28
52. Major W, Davidson K. 1997. Gas turbine power generation: environmental analysis and policy considerations. Carlsbad, CA: Onsite Energy Corp.
53. Heavenrich RM, Hellman KH. 1996. Light-Duty Automotive Technology and Fuel Economy Trends Through 1996, EPA/AA/TDSG/96-01. Ann Arbor, MI: Off. Mobile Sources, US Environ. Prot. Agency
54. Westbrook FW. 1989. Allocation of New Car Fuel Economy Improvements, 1976-1989: Synopsis. Pap. submitt. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge Natl. Lab.
55. Off. Technol. Assess. (OTA), US Congr. 1995. Renewing Our Energy Future, OTA-ETI-614. Washington, DC: US Gov. Print. Off.
56. US Congress, Off. Technol. Assess. 1996. OTA Legacy. Washington, DC: US Gov. Print. Off. (Five-CD set: Stock no. 052-003-01457-2, $23 US)
57. US Dep. Energy, Off. Heavy Vehicle Technol. 1996. Office of Heavy Vehicle Technologies Strategic Plan. Washington, DC: US Dep Energy
58. Jost K. 1997. Gasoline-reforming fuel cell. Automot. Eng. 105(2):51-52
59. Oei D-G. 1997. Fuel cell engines for vehicles. Automat. Eng. 105(2):115-17
60. Yamaguchi J. 1997. Toyota RAV4 EV - today and tomorrow. Automot. Eng. 105(2):62-65
61. Delucchi MA. 1991. Emissions of Greenhouse Gases from the Use of Transportation Fuels and Electricity, Vol. 1, ANL/ESD/TM-22. Argonne, IL: Cent. Transp. Res., Argonne Natl. Lab.
62. Wang MQ. 1997. GREET 1.0 - Transportation Fuel Cycles Model: Methodology and Use, ANL/ESD-33. Argonne, IL: Argonne Natl. Lab.
63. Leiby PN, Greene DL, Vidas H. 1996. Market potential and impacts of alternative fuel use in light-duty vehicles: A 2000/22010 analysis, DOE/PO-0042. Washington, DC: US Dep. Energy
64. Hadder GR. 1997. Estimation of Ethanol Demand in Gasoline Production. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge Natl. Lab.
65. Off. Energy Effic. Renew. Energy, US Dep. Energy. 1997. Quality Metrics Database for FY1998. Washington, DC: US Dep. Energy
66. CONEG. 1996. Utility Coal Biomass Cofiring Plant Opportunities and Conceptual Assessments. Washington, DC: CONEG Policy Res. Cent.
67. Parsons B, Wan Y, Elliolt D. 1995. Estimates of Wind Resources Located in Close Proximity to Existing Transmission Lines. NREL/TP-463-7096. Golden, CO: Natl. Renew. Energy Lab.
68. Williams S, Bateman BG. 1995. Power Plays. Invest. Responsib. Res. Cent.
69. US Dep. Energy. 1994. Climate Challenge Options Workbook. Washington, DC: US Dep. Energy
70. Mattice JS. 1991. Ecological effects of hydropower facilities. In Hydropower Engineering Handbook, ed. JS Gulliver, REA Arndt. New York: McGraw-Hill
71. Sale MJ, Cada GF, Chang LH, Christensen SW, Francfort JE, et al. 1991. Environmental Mitigation at Hydroelectric Projects, Vol. I: Current Practices for Instream Flow Needs, Dissolved Oxygen, and Fish Passage, DOE/ID-10360. Idaho Falls, ID: US Dep. Energy
72. Rinehart BN, Francfort JE, Sommers GL, Cada GF, Sale MJ. 1997. DOE Hydropower Program, Biennial Report, 1996-1997, DOE/ID-10510. Idaho Falls, ID: US Dep. Energy
73. Off. Conserv, Renew. Energy. 1990. Renewable Energy Technology Evolution Rationales. Washington, DC: US Dep. Energy
74. South DW, Meade TB, Camp RL, Schwartz MH. 1997. Role of Nuclear Energy in Reducing U.S. and Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Washington, DC: Energy Resourc. Int.
75. Nucl. Regul. Comm. Inf. Dig. 1996. NRC Report NUREG-1350, Vol. 8, July
76. Electr. PowerRes. Inst. 1986. Power Plant Performance Monitoring and improvement, Rep. CS/EL-4415, Vol. 3. Palo Alto, CA: Electr. Power Res. Inst.
77. Electr. Power Res. Inst. 1989. PowerPlant Performance Monitoring and Improvement, Rep. CS/EL-4415. Palo Alto, CA: Electr. Power Res. Inst.
78. Southern Co. 1993. The Southern Company and the Southern Environment. Atlanta, GA: Southern
79. Siegel J. 1997. The economic and environmental benefits of improving the performance of coal-fired power stations. Presented at Workshop Coal and Global Environ., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, June 16-17
80. Barnes PR, Van Dyke JW, McConnell .W, Cohn SM, Purucker SL. 1995. The Feasibility of Replacing or Upgrading Utility Distribution Transformers During Routine Maintenance. ORNL/6804/R1. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge Natl. Lab.