Interaction between two types of information on reactions to delays

Marketing Letters

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 151-162

  Hui, Michael K ^a   Tse, Alan C ^a   Zhou, Lianxi ^b  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

Attribution; Control deprivation; Delay; Information

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646573005     PISSN: 09230645     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11002-006-5927-3     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Antonides, G., Verhoef, P.C., & Van Aalst, M. (2002). Consumer perception and evaluation of waiting time: a field experiment. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(3), 193-202.
2. Averill, J.R. (1973). Personal control over aversive stimuli and its relationship to stress. Psychological Bulletin, 80(4), 286-303.
3. Baker, J., & Cameron, M. (1996). The effects of the service environment on affect and consumer perception of waiting time: An integrative review and research propositions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24, 338-349.
4. Bitner, M.J. (1990). Evaluating service encounters: The effects of physical surroundings and employee responses. Journal of Marketing, 54, 69-82.
5. Bolton, R.N., & Drew, J.H. (1994). Linking customer satisfaction to service operations and outcomes. In Rust, R.T. & Oliver, R.L. (eds.), Seivice quality: New directions in theory and practice, London: Sage, pp. 173-200.
6. Burger, J.M., & Hemans, L.T. (1988). Desire for control and the use of attribution processes. Journal of Personality, 56(3), 531-546.
7. Chebat, J.-C., Filiatrault, P., Gelinas-Chebat, C., & Vaninsky, A. (1995). Impact of waiting attribution & consumer's mood on perceived quality. Journal of Business Research, 34(3), 191-196.
8. Durrande-Moreau, A. (1999). Waiting for service: ten years of empirical research. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 10(2), 171-189.
9. Flaherty, M.G. (1999). A watched pot: how we experienced time. New York: New York University Press.
10. Forsyth, D.R. (1980). The functions of attributions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 184-189.
11. Harvey, J.H., & Weary, G. (1984). Current issues in attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 35, 427-459.
12. Hornik, J. (1984). Subjective vs. objective time measures: a note on the perception of time in consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 615-618.
13. Hui, M.K., Thakor, M.V., & R. Gill (1998). The effect of delay type and service stage on consumers' reactions to waiting. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 469-479.
14. Hui, M.K., & Tse, D.K. (1996). What to tell consumers in waits of different lengths: an integrative model of service evaluation. Journal of Marketing, 60, 81-90.
15. Jacoby, J., Szybillo, G.J. & Berning, C.K. (1976). Time and consumer behavior: an interdisciplinary overview. Journal of Consumer Research, 2, 320-339.
16. Johnston, R. (1994). Exploring the relationship between service transactions and satisfaction with overall service. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 6(2), 46-61.
17. Katz, K.L., Larson, B.M., & Larson, R.C. (1987). Prescription for the waiting-in-line blues: entertain, enlighten. & engage. Sloan Management Review, 32, 44-53.
18. Kelley, H.H. (1972). Attribution in social interaction. Morristown. NJ: General, Learning Press.
19. Keppel, G., & Zedeck, S. (1989). Data analysis for research designs: Analysis of variance and multiple regression/correlation approaches. New York: W. H. Freeman.
20. Krishnamurthy, P., & Kumar, P. (2002). Self-other discrepancies in waiting time decisions. Organisational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87(2), 207-226.
21. Lerner, M.J., & Miller, D.T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85(5), 1030-1051.
22. Maister, D.H. (1985). The psychology of waiting in lines. In Czepiel, J.A. Solomon, M.R., & Surprenant, C.F. (eds.). The service encounter, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, pp. 113-123.
23. Miller, D.T., & Porter, C.A. (1988). Errors and biases in the attribution process. In Abramson, L.Y. (ed.). Social cognition and clinical psychology: A synthesis. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 3-30.
24. Mowen, J.C., & Mowen. M.M. (1991). Time and outcome valuation: Implications for marketing decision making. Journal of Marketing, 55, 54-62.
25. Oliver, R.L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 460-469.
26. Osuna, E.E. (1985). The psychological cost of waiting. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 29(1), 82-105.
27. Pittman, T.S., Stephenson, B., & Swann, W.B. (1981). Curiosity and control: on the determinants of the search for social knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 635-642.
28. Pruyn, A., & Smidts, A. (1998). Effects of waiting on the satisfaction with the service: beyond objective time measures. International Journal of Research in Marketing 15(4), 321-334.
29. Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: distortions in the attribution process. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic. (11).
30. Russell, D. (1982). The causal dimension scale: a measure of how individuals perceive causes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1137-1145.
31. Seligman, M.E.P. (1975). Helplessness. San Francisco: Freeman.
32. Taylor, S., & Claxton, J. (1994). Delays and the dynamics of service evaluations. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 22(3), 254-264.
33. Tse, D.K., & Wilton, P.T. (1988). Models of consumer satisfaction formation: an extension. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 204-212.
34. Zakay, D. (1989). Subjective time and attentional resource allocation: an integrated model of time estimation. In Levin, I. & Zakay, D. (eds.). Time and human cognition: A life-span perspective, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science, pp. 365-397.
35. Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L., & Parasuraman, A. (1993). The nature and determinants of customer expectations of service. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21, 1-12.