Views of physicians, disciplinary board members and practicing lawyers on the new statutory disciplinary system for health care in The Netherlands

Health Policy

Volumn 77, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 202-211

  Cuperus Bosma, Jacqueline M ^a   Hout, Fredericus A G ^a   Hubben, Joep H ^a   van der Wal, Gerrit ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Disciplinary boards; Disciplinary proceedings; Disciplinary system for health care; Individual health care professions act; Physicians; Practicing lawyers

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; LAWYER; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL PROFESSION; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; NETHERLANDS; PHYSICIAN;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; EMPLOYEE DISCIPLINE; EXPERT TESTIMONY; HUMANS; LAWYERS; LICENSURE, MEDICAL; MALPRACTICE; NETHERLANDS; PHYSICIANS; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PUBLIC POLICY; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPECIALTY BOARDS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

EID: 33646570226     PISSN: 01688510     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Kusserow R.P., Handley E.A., and Yessian M.R. An overview of state medical discipline. The Journal of the American Medical Association 257 (1987) 820-824
2. Smith R. Discipline I: the hordes at the gates. British Medical Journal 298 (1989) 1502-1505
3. Smith R. Discipline II: the preliminary screener-a powerful gatekeeper. British Medical Journal 298 (1989) 1569-1571
4. Smith R. Discipline III: the final stages. British Medical Journal 298 (1989) 1632-1634
5. Smith R. Dealing with sickness and incompetence: success and failure. British Medical Journal 298 (1989) 1695-1698
6. Irvine D. Problem docters in the UK: role of the general medical council. In: Lens P., and Wal G.v.d. (Eds). Problem doctors: a conspiracy of silence (1997), IOS Press/Ohmsha, Ltd., Amsterdam/Berlin/Oxford/Tokyo/Washington
7. Roscam Abbing H.D.C. Medical practice and disciplinary measures in the European union. In: Lens P., and Wal G.v.d. (Eds). Problem doctors: a conspiracy of silence (1997), IOS Press/Ohmsha, Ltd., Amsterdam-Berlin-Oxford-Tokyo-Washington
8. Ameringer C.F. State medical boards and the politics of public protection (1999), The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London
9. Cardarelli R., Licciardone J.C., and Ramirez G. Predicting risk for disciplinary action by a state medical board. Texas Medicine 100 January 1 (2004) 84-90
10. Clay S.W., and Conatser R.R. Characteristics of physicians disciplined by the State Medical Board of Ohio. The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association 103 February 2 (2003) 81-88
11. Lower House 19 522, 1985/86, no. 3, p. 64 [in Dutch].
12. Hubben J.H. Lack of understanding of disciplinary verdicts. Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde 142 (1998) 1851-1853 [in Dutch]
13. Cuperus-Bosma JM, Roscam Abbing HDC, Gevers JKM, Hubben JH, van der Wal G, Derckx VL, et al. Evaluation of the Individual Health Care Professions Act. Den Haag: ZonMw; 2002 [in Dutch].
14. Hout FAG, Cuperus-Bosma JM, Peuter OR de, Hubben JH, Wal G van der. Statutory disciplinary proceedings for health care in The Netherlands: a 20-year overview, submitted for publication [in Dutch].
15. Hout F.A.G., Cuperus-Bosma J.M., de Peuter O.R., Hubben J.H., and Wal G.v.d. No improvement of disciplinary procedings since the implementation of the Individual Health Care Professions Act (IHCP Act). Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde 148 (2004) 135-139 [in Dutch]