Protein fold recognition with support vector machines fusion network

Progress in Biochemistry and Biophysics

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 155-162

  Shi, Jian Yu ^a   Pan, Quan ^a   Zhang, Shao Wu ^a   Liang, Yan ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN POLYTECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Classifier fusion; Dynamic selection; Protein fold recognition; Support vector machines (SVM)

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646568498     PISSN: 10003282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Kneller D G, Cohen F E, Langridge R. Improvements in protein secondary-structure prediction by enhanced neural networks. J Mol Biol, 1990, 214(1): 171-182
2. Zhang C T, Chou K C. An optimization approach to predicting protein structural class from amino acid composition. Protein Sci, 1992, 1 (3): 401-408
3. Dubchak I, Muchnik I, Mayor C, et al. Recognition of a protein fold in the context of the SCOP classification. Proteins, 1999, 35(4): 401-407
4. Ding C H Q, Dubchak I. Multi-class protein fold recognition using support vector machines and neural networks. Bioinformatics, 2001, 17 (4): 349-358
5. Chinnasamy A, Sung W K, Mittal A. Protein structure and fold prediction using tree-augmented naive bayesian classifier. J Bioinform Comput Biol, 2005, 3 (4): 803-820.
6. Zhang S W, Pan Q, Chen R S, et al. Prog Biochem Biophys, 2003, 30 (6): 879-883
7. Nakashima H, Nishikawa K, Ooi T. The folding type of a protein is relevant to the amino acid composition. J Biochem, 1986, 99(1): 153-162
8. Vapnik V. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. New York: Spinger-Verlag, 1995. 1-188
9. Jaakkola T, Dickhans M, Haussler D. Using the fisher kernel method to detect remote protein homologies. In: Lengauer T, eds. Proceedings of The Seventh International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology. Menlo Park: AAAI Press, 1999. 149-158
10. Zien A, Ratsch G, Mika S, et al. Engineering support vector machine kernels that recognize translation initiation sites. Bioinformatics, 2000, 16 (9): 799-807
11. Hua S J, Sun Z R. Support vector machine approach for protein subcellular localization prediction. Bioinformatics, 2001, 17 (8): 721-728
12. Cai Y D, Liu X J, Xu X B, et al. Support vector machines for prediction of protein subcellular location by incorporating quasi-sequence-order effect. J Cell Biochem, 2002, 84 (2): 343-348
13. Rost B, Sander C. Combining evolutionary information and neural networks to predict protein secondary structure. Proteins 1994, 19 (1): 55-72
14. Joachims T. Making large-scale SVM learning practical. In: Schölkopf B, eds. Advances in Kernel Methods:Support Vector Learning. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1999. 169-184
15. Kre(el U. Pairwise classification and support vector machines. In: Schölkopf B, eds. Advances in Kernel Methods:Support Vector Learning. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1999. 255-268
16. Platt J, Cristianini N, Shawe-Taylor J. Large margin dags for multiclass classification. In: Jordan M I, eds. Proceedings of Neural Information Processing Systems. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2000. 547-553
17. Crammer K, Singer Y. On the learnability and design of output codes for multiclass problems. In: Cesa-Bianchi N, eds. Proceedings of the Thirteen Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2000. 35-46
18. Hsu C W, Lin C J. A comparison of methods for multi-class support vector machines. IEEE Transactions in Neural Networks, 2002, 13 (2): 415-425
19. Kuncheva L I. Switching between selection and fusion in combining classifiers: an experiment. IEEE Transactions on SMC (Part B), 2002, 32 (2): 146-156.
20. Webb A R. Translated by Wang P, et al. Statistical pattern recognition. 2nd. Beijing: Publishing House of Electronics Industry, 2004. 218-226
21. Kittler J, Hatef M, Duin R, et al. On combining classifiers. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1998, 20 (3): 226-239