What happens if you delay scanning Digora phosphor storage plates (PSPs) for up to 4 hours?

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 143-146

  Martins, M G B Q ^a   Whaites, E J ^b   Ambrosano, G M B ^a   Haiter Neto, F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Dental; digital images; Phosphor storage plates; Radiography; Storage conditions

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM; PHOSPHORUS;

ARTICLE; DIGITAL IMAGING; FREEZING; HUMIDITY; MANDIBLE; RADIOLOGIST; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STORAGE; TEMPERATURE SENSITIVITY; TIME;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENSITOMETRY, X-RAY; HUMANS; HUMIDITY; MANDIBLE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; REFRIGERATION; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TEMPERATURE; TIME FACTORS; X-RAY INTENSIFYING SCREENS;

EID: 33646566296     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/29710762     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Wenzel A. Digital imaging for dental caries. Dent Clin North Am 2000; 44: 319-338.
2. Miles DA, Razzano MR. The future of digital imaging in dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 2000; 44: 427-438.
3. Berkhout WER, Sanderink GCH, Van der Stelt PF. A comparison of digital and film radiography in Dutch dental practices assessed by questionnaire. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002; 31: 93-99.
4. Friedland B. Practical considerations in intraoral digital radiography. J Mass Dent Soc 1999; 48: 34-40.
5. Haiter Neto F, Oliveira AE, Tuji FM, Rocha AS. Digital radiography in nowadays. Rev ABRO 2000; 1: 1-6.
6. Martins MGBQ, Haiter Neto F, Whaites EJ. Analysis of digital images acquired using different phosphor storage plates (PSPs) subjected to varying reading times and storage conditions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003; 32: 186-190.
7. Oliveira AE, Almeida SM, Paganini GA, Haiter Neto F, Bóscolo FN. Comparative study of two digital radiographic storage phosphor systems. Braz Dent J 2000; 11: 111-116.
8. Haiter Neto F, Boscolo FN, Almeida SM, Oliveira AE. Comparative study of two digital radiographic storage phosphor systems. Pesqui Odontol Bras 2000; 14: 130. (Abstract).
9. Borg E, Attaelmanan A, Grondahl HG. Subjective image quality of solid-state and photostimulable phosphor systems for digital intraoral radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000; 29: 70-75.
10. Araki K, Endo A, Okano T. An objective comparison of four digital intra-oral radiographic systems: sensitometric properties and resolution. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000; 29: 76-80.
11. Hintze H, Wenzel A, Frydenberg M. Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002; 31: 170-175.
12. Ganzerli ASR. Avaliação interexaminadores no diagnóstico de cáries proximais e oclusais, utilizando imagens canvencionais e digitais. [Dissertation] Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil: Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 2001.
13. Hildebolt CF, Couture RA, Whiting BR. Dental photostimulable phosphor radiography. Dent Clin North Am 2000; 44: 273-297.
14. Van der Stelt PF. Principles of digital imaging. Dent Clin North Am 2000; 44: 237-248.
15. Mauriello SM, Platin E. Dental digital radiographic imaging. J Dent Hyg 2001; 75: 323-331.