Assessing environmental vulnerability in EIA-The content and context of the vulnerability concept in an alternative approach to standard EIA procedure

Environmental Impact Assessment Review

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 511-527

  Kværner, Jens ^a   Swensen, Grete ^b   Erikstad, Lars ^c  

^a NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE OF BIOECONOMY RESEARCH   (Norway)

^b NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE RESEARCH   (Norway)

^c NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE FOR NATURE RESEARCH   (Norway)

Author keywords

Alternatives; EIA; Environmental decision making; Environmental impact assessment; Vulnerability

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; HYDROGEOLOGY; LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

ALTERNATIVES; EIA; ENVIRONMENTAL DECISION-MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; VULNERABILITY;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT;

DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; HYDROGEOLOGY; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; VULNERABILITY;

EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; NORWAY; SCANDINAVIA;

EID: 33646533544     PISSN: 01959255     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2006.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Aars Ø. The Romerike gate. A railway turning into a local watergate. In: Kajander J. (Ed). XX Nordic hydrological conference, Nordic associations for hydrology, Helsinki, Finland, 10-13 August 1998. Nordic hydrological programme. NHP report vol. 44 (1998) 234-241
2. Adams B., and Foster S.S.D. Land-surface zoning for groundwater protection. J Inst Water Environ Manag 6 (1992) 312-320
3. Adams B., Civita M., Gilbrich W.H., Vrba J., and van Waegingh H. Model legend for groundwater vulnerability maps. In: Vrba J., and Zaporozec A. (Eds). Guidebook on mapping groundwater vulnerability. International contributions to hydrogeology vol. 16 (1994) 87-99
4. Amundsen I. Vegutforming og landskapstilpassing: visuelle forhold i norsk vegbygging fra 1930 til i dag. Dr. Ing. Thesis. Institutt for veg-og jernbanebygging, Norges tekniske høgskole, Trondheim; 1995 [Road shape and adapting to landscape: visual characteristics in Norwegian road constructions from 1930 to today.]
5. Bradley M.P., and Smith E. Using science to assess environmental vulnerabilities. Environ Monit Assess 94 (2004) 1-7
6. Bredesen B., Hoftun I., Nummedal Røise K., Stokke M., and Kummeneje K. Miljøhensyn i oversiktsplanlegging. Statens vegvesen. Buskerud (2002) [Environmental consideration in overview planning]
7. Cavallin A., Marchetti M., Panizza M., and Soldati M. The role of geomorphology in environmental impact assessment. Geomorphology 9 2 (1994) 143-153
8. Civita M. Data needs and presentation. In: Vrba J., and Zaporozec A. (Eds). Guidebook on mapping groundwater vulnerability. International contributions to hydrogeology vol. 16 (1994) 57-73
9. Dalkmann H., Herrera R.J., and Bongard D. Analytic strategic environmental assessment (ANSEA) developing a new approach to SEA. Environ Impact Asses Rev 24 4 (2004) 385-402
10. De Villotta I., Goy J.L., Zazo C., Barrela I., and Pedraza J. Landscape analysis based on environmental units and visual areas. The use of geomorphological units as a basic framework. La Vall de Gallinera, Alicante. In: Marchetti M., and Rivas V. (Eds). Geomorphological and environmental impact assessment (2001), A. A. Balkema Publishers 133-153
11. Devito K.J., Hill A.R., and Roulet N.T. Groundwater-surface water interactions in headwater wetlands of the Canadian Shield. J Hydrol 181 1-2 (1996) 127-147
12. Dupagne A., and Teller J. The application of EIA/SEA procedures to urban heritage: what is to be changed?. In: Kozlowski R. (Ed). Cultural heritage research: a Pan-European challenge. Proceedings of the 5th EC conference Crakow (2002) 127-130
13. Erikstad L. Forsvarets relokalisering Gardemoen - Konsekvenser for natur, forurensning og avrenning. NINA Oppdragsmelding 457 (1996) 90 [New training areas - Gardermoen. Environmental impact assessment]
14. Erikstad L. Geological heritage and environmental impact assessment: can quality and quantity be merged?. In: Marinos P.G., Koukis G.C., Tsiambaos G.C., and Stournaras G.C. (Eds). Engineering geology and the environment. Proceedings International Symposium Engineering Geology and the Environment, organized by the Greek National Group of IAEG/Athens/Greece 23-27 June 1997 (1997) 2927-2931
15. Foster S.S.D. Fundamental concepts in aquifer vulnerability pollution risk and protection strategy. In: van Duijvenbooden M., and van Waegeningh H.G. (Eds). Vulnerability of soil and groundwater to pollutants. TNO committee on hydrological research, The Hague, proceedings and information vol. 38 (1987) 69-86
16. Frey B.S. The evaluation of cultural heritage: some critical issues. In: Hutter M., and Rizzo I. (Eds) (1997), Economic Perspectives on Cultural Heritage, London 31-49
17. Fry G.L.A., Skar B., Jerpåsen G., Bakkestuen V., and Erikstad L. Locating archaeological sites in the landscape: a hierarchical approach based on landscape indicators. Landsc Urban Plan 67 1-4 (2004) 97-107
18. Gilbrich W.H., and Zaporozec A. Introduction. In: Vrba J., and Zaporozec A. (Eds). Guidebook on mapping groundwater vulnerability. International contributions to hydrogeology vol 16 (1994) 1-7
19. King T.F. What should be the "cultural resources" element of an EIA?. Environ Impact Asses Rev 20 1 (2000) 5-30
20. Kozlowski J.M. Sustainable development in professional planning: a potential contribution of the EIA and UET concepts. Landsc Urban Plan 19 4 (2002) 307-332
21. Litton Jr. R.B. Aesthetic dimensions of landscape. In: Krutilla J.V. (Ed). Natural environments. Studies in theoretical and applied analysis (1972), The John Hopkins University Press Ltd., London 262-269
22. Marusic J. Conservation planning within a framework of landscape planning in Slovenia. Landsc Urban Plan 23 3-4 (1993) 233-237
23. In: Navrud S., and Ready R.C. (Eds). Valuing cultural heritage. applying environmental valuation techniques to historic buildings, monuments and artifacts, Cheltenham/Northampton (2002)
24. Nilsson C., and Grelsson G. The fragility of ecosystems: a review. J Appl Ecol 32 4 (1995) 677-692
25. Orians G. Diversity, stability and maturity in natural ecosystems. In: Van Dobben W.H., and Lowe-McConnell R.H. (Eds). Unifying concepts in ecology (1975), Dr. W. Junk, The Hague 139-158
26. Recatalá L., and Sánchez J. A methodology for assessing landscape quality for environmental impact assessment and land use planning; application to a Mediterranean environment. In: Marchetti M., and Rivas V. (Eds). Geomorphological and environmental impact assessment (2001), A. A. Balkema Publishers 133-153
27. Skinner A., and Foster S. Managing land to protect water: the British experience on groundwater protection. Paper presented at solutions 1995 at the XXVI congress of the IAH Edmonton 4-10 June 1995 (1995) 9
28. Steinemann A. Improving alternatives for environmental impact assessment. Environ Impact Asses Rev 21 1 (2001) 3-21
29. Swensen G. Omgivelsenes sårbarhet - om kulturmiljøbegrepets nytteverdi. In: Balto J.A., Wilberg J., Ekroll Ø., Swensen G., and Sauge B. (Eds). Fortidsminneforeningens årbok. Oslo (2003) 97-104 [Vulnerability of the environment and the utility of the concept cultural environments]
30. Teller J., and Bond A. Review of present European environmental policies and legislation involving cultural heritage. Environ Impact Asses Rev 22 6 (2002) 611-632
31. The Norwegian Directorate of Road Planning. Konsekvensanalyser. Håndbok vol. 140 (1995) [Environmental Impact Assessments. Guidelines T 140]
32. The Norwegian Ministry of Environment. Rundskriv. Konsekvensutredninger etter plan-og bygningsloven (1997) [Guidelines Environmental Impact Assessments to the Plan and Building Act]
33. The Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate. NVE - Veileder nr. 1-1998 (1998) [NVE - Guidelines no. 1-1998]
34. Weston J. From Poole to Fulham: a changing culture in UK environmental impact assessment decision making?. J Environ Plan Manag 45 3 (2002) 425-443
35. Weston J. EIA in a risk society. J Environ Plan Manag 47 2 (2004) 313-325
36. Zaporozec A., and Vrba J. Classification and review of groundwater vulnerability maps. In: Vrba J., and Zaporozec A. (Eds). Guidebook on mapping groundwater vulnerability. International contributions to hydrogeology vol. 16 (1994) 21-29