EIA in a risk society

Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 313-325

  Weston, Joe ^a  

^a OXFORD BROOKES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 2442487899     PISSN: 09640568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0964056042000209058     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Beattie, R. B. (1995) Everything you already know about EIA (but don't often admit), Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 15(2), pp. 109-114.
2. Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (London: Sage).
3. Beck, U. (1995) Ecological Politics in an Age of Risk (Cambridge: Polity).
4. Bell, D. (1961) The End of Ideology (New York: Collier).
5. Blowers, A. (1997) Environmental policy: ecological modernisation or risk society? Urban Studies, 34(5-6), pp. 864-871.
6. Boehmer-Christiansen, S. (1994) Politics and environmental management, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 37(1), pp. 69-851.
7. Burchell, R. & Listokin, D. (1975) The Environmental Impact Assessment Handbook (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University, Centre for Policy Studies).
8. Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (CEAA) (1994) Citizen's Guide to EIA (Hull, Quebec: CEAA).
9. Canter, L. (1977) Environmental Impact Assessment (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company).
10. Carpenter, R. (1999) Keep EIA focussed, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 19, pp. 111-112.
11. Connelly, J. & Smith, G. (1999) Politics and the Environment: From Theory to Practice (London: Routledge).
12. Cotgrove, S. & Duff, A. (1980) Environmentalism, middle class radicalism and politics, Sociological Review, 28, pp. 335-351.
13. Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) (1997) The National Environmental Policy Act: A Study of its Effectiveness after Twenty Five Years (Washington: CEQ).
14. Department of the Environment Transport and the Regions (DETR) (2000) Environmental Impact Assessment: A Guide to the Procedures (Tunbridge, Kent: Thomas Telford Publishing).
15. Erickson, P. (1979) Environmental Impact Assessment: Principles and Applications (New York: Academic Press).
16. Fortlage, C. A. (1990) Environmental Assessment: A Practical Guide (London: Gower-Technical).
17. Frost, R. (1997) EIA Monitoring and audit, in: J. Weston (Ed.) Planning and Environmental Impact Assessment in Practice (Harlow: Longman).
18. Galbraith, J. K. (1969) The New Industrial State (London: Penguin).
19. Gamble, A. (1981) An Introduction to Modern Social and Political Thought (London: Macmillan).
20. Garner, R. (1996) Environmental Politics (London: Prentice Hall).
21. Glasson, G., Therivel, R. & Chadwick, A. (1999) Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment, 2nd edn (London: UCL Press).
22. Goldblatt, D. (1999) Risk society and the environment, in: M. J. Smith (Ed.) Thinking Through the Environment: A Reader (London: Routledge/Open University).
23. Hall, P. (1982) Urban and Regional Planning, 2nd edn (London: George Allen and Unwin).
24. HMG (2000) Third Report of the House of Lords Science and Technology Committee (London: Stationery Office).
25. Huxham, M. & Summer, D. (2000) Science and Environmental Decision Making (Harlow: Prentice Hall).
26. Impacts Assessment Unit (IAU) (1999) Review of environmental statement in respect of proposed waste water treatment works at Seabank, Arklow, Co. Wiklow, Republic of Ireland. Unpublished research report, School of Planning, Oxford Brookes University.
27. Jain, R., Urban, L. & Stacey, G. (1981) Environmental Impact Analysis: New Dimensions in Decision Making, 2nd edn (New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co).
28. Jónsdóttir, S. (1999) Environmental assessments-philosophy, politics and practice. What can we learn from Nordic studies? Proceedings from the 3rd Nordic EIA/SEA Conference 22-23 November.
29. Kasperson, R., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H., Emel, J., Goble, R., Kasperson, J. & Ratick, S. (1998) The social amplification of risk: a conceptual framework, in: R. Löfsedt & L. Frewer (Eds) Risk and Modern Society (London: Earthscan).
30. Kennedy, W. V. (1988) Environmental Impact Assessment in North America, Western Europe: what has worked where, how and why? International Environmental Reporter, 11(4), pp. 257-262.
31. Kontic, B. (2000) Why are some experts more credible than others? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20, pp. 427-434.
32. Lawrence, D. (1997) The need for EIA theory-building, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 17(2), pp. 79-107.
33. Lawrence, D. (2000) Planning theories and environmental impact assessment, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20, pp. 607-625.
34. Leknes, E. (2001) The role of EIA in the decision-making process, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 21, pp. 309-344.
35. Lower Sunbury Residents Association (LOSRA) (2001) Letter to the Head of Planning and Building Control Services, Spelthorne Borough Council, 18 July.
36. McNabb, A. (1997) Scoping and public participation, in: J. Weston (Ed.) Planning and Environmental Impact Assessment in Practice (Harlow: Longman).
37. Munn, R. (Ed.) (1979) Environmental Impact Assessment: Principles and Procedures (Chichester: John Wiley and Sons).
38. Oosterveer, P. (2002) Reinventing risk politics: reflexive modernity and the European BSE crisis, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 4, pp. 215-229.
39. Pepper, D. (1984) The Roots of Modern Environmentalism (Beckenham: Croom Helm).
40. Rodgers, J. (1976) Environmental Impact Assessment, Growth Management, and the Comprehensive Plan, pp. 39-40 (Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company).
41. Singleton, R., Castle, P. & Short, D. (1999) Environmental Assessment (London: Thomas Telford Publishing).
42. Smith, G. & May, D. (1997) The artificial debate between rationalist and incrementalist models of decision making, in: M. Hill (Ed.) The Policy Process: A Reader, 2nd edn (London: Prentice Hall/Wheatsheaf).
43. Vincent, A. (1992) Modern Political Ideologies (Oxford: Blackwell).
44. Wathern, P. (1988) Introduction, in: P. Wathern (Ed.) Environmental Impact Assessment: Theory and Practice (London: Routledge).
45. Weston, J. (1995) Consultants in the EIA process, Environmental Policy and Practice, 5(3), pp. 131-134.
46. Weston, J. (1997) Consultation and the conflict of interests in the EIA process, in: J. Weston (Ed.) Planning and Environmental Impact Assessment in Practice (Harlow: Longman).
47. Weston, J. (2000) EIA, Decision-making theory and screening and scoping in UK practice, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43(2), 185-203.
48. Weston, J. (2003) Is there a future for EIA? Response to Benson, in 'Round Table', Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 21(2), pp. 278-280.
49. Wood, C. (1993) Environmental Impact Assessment: A Comparative Review (Harlow: Longman).