Stories, studies, and suggestions about reading

Scientific Studies of Reading

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 121-142

  Williams, Joanna P ^a  

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646521971     PISSN: 10888438     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s1532799xssr1002_1     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. Allington, R. L., & McGill-Franzen, A. (1989). School response to reading failure: Chapter 1 and special education students in Grades 2, 4, and 8. Elementary School Journal, 89, 529-542.
2. Anderson, R. C., Spiro, R. J., & Andersen, M. C. (1978). Schemata as scaffolding for the representation of information in discourse. American Educational Research Journal, 15, 433-440.
3. Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353-394). New York: Longman.
4. Bloomfield, L., & Barnhart, C. L. (1963). Let's read. Bronxville, NY: Clarence L. Barnhart, Inc.
5. Bond, G. L., & Dykstra, R. (1967). Coordinating center for first-grade reading instruction programs (U.S. Office of Education Project No. X-001). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
6. Brown, R., Pressley, M., Van Meter, P., & Schuder, T. (1996). A quasi-experimental validation of transactional strategies instruction with low-achieving second-grade readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 18-37.
7. Cutting, L. E., & Scarborough, H. (2005, June). Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributions of word recognition, fluency, and cognitive-linguistic skills can depend on how comprehension is measured. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading. Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
8. Dimino, J., Gersten, R., Carnine, D., & Blake, G. (1990). Story grammar: An approach for promoting at-risk secondary students' comprehension of literature. Elementary School Journal, 91, 19-32.
9. Dreher, M. J., & Baker, L. (2005. June). Balancing learning to read and reading for learning: Infusion information hooks into primary-grade classrooms. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, Toronto, ON.
10. Elkonin, D. E. (1963). The psychology of mastering the elements of reading. In B. Simon & J. Simon (Eds.), Educational psychology in the U.S.S.R. (pp. 214-221). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
11. Flesch, R. (1955). Why Johnny can't read - And what you can do about it. New York: Harper & Row.
12. Foonnan, B. R., Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., Schatschneider, C., & Mehta. P. (1998). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 37-55.
13. Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Promoting word recognition, fluency, and reading comprehension in young children. Journal of Special Education, 39, 34-44.
14. Gibson, E. J., Pick, A.,Osser, H., & Hammond, M. (1962). The role of grapheme-phoneme correspondence in the perception of words. American Journal of Psychology, 75, 554-570.
15. Jeffrey, W. E., & Samuels, S. J. (1967). The effect of method of reading training on initial learning and transfer. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 354-358.
16. Jenkins, J. R., Bausell, R. B., & Jenkins, L. M. (1972). Comparisons of letter name and letter sound training as transfer variables. American Educational Research Journal, 9, 75-86.
17. Keenan, J. M., Betjemann, R. S., & Roth, L. S. (2005, May). A comparison of comprehension tests. Paper presented at the Seventy-seventh Meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.
18. Kling, J. W., Schlosberg, H., & Williams, J. P. (1959). Patterns of skin conductance during rotary pursuit. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 9, 303-312.
19. Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
20. Levy, B. A. (2001). Moving the bottom: Improving reading fluency. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 357-382). New York: York Press.
21. Liberman, I. Y. (1973). Segmentation of the spoken word and reading acquisition. Bulletin of the Orton Society, 25, 65-77.
22. Lovett, M. W., Lacerenza, L., Borden, S. L., Frijters, J. C., Steinbach, K. S., & DePalma, M. (2000). Components of effective remediation for developmental reading disabilities: Combining phonological and strategy-based instruction to improve outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 263-283.
23. Lyon, G. R., Fletcher, J., Fuchs, L., & Chhabra, V. (in press). Treatment of learning disabilities. In E. Mash & R. Barkley (Eds.), Treatment of childhood disorders (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.
24. Mathes, P. G., Torgesen, J, K., & Allor, J. H. (2001). The effects of peer-assisted literacy strategies for first-grade readers with and without additional computer-assisted instruction in phonological awareness. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 371-410.
25. McMaster, K. L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Compton, D. L. (2005). Responding to nonresponders: An experimental field trial of identification and intervention methods. Exceptional Children, 71, 445-463.
26. Meyer, B. J. F., Brandt, D. M., & Bluth, G. J. (1980). Use of top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension of ninth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 72-103.
27. Mostow, J., & Beck, J. (2005, June). Micro-analysis of fluency gains in a reading tutor that listens. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
28. National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
29. Oakhill, J. V. (1984). Inferential and memory skills in children's comprehension of stories. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 31-39.
30. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 117-175.
31. Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
32. Rumelhart, D. E., & Ortony, A. (1977). The representation of knowledge in memory. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, & W. E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 99-136). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
33. Simmons, D. C., Kame'enui, E. J., Stoolmiller, M., Coyne, M. D., & Harn, B. (2003). Accelerating growth and maintaining proficiency: A two-year intervention study of kindergarten and first-grade children at risk for reading difficulties. In B. R. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties (pp. 197-228). New York: York Press.
34. Smolkin, L. B., & Donovan, C. A. (2001). The contexts of comprehension: The information book read aloud, comprehension acquisition, and comprehension instruction in a first-grade classroom. Elementary School Journal, 102, 97-122.
35. Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
36. Stafford, K. B., Williams, J. P., Nubla-Kung, A., & Pollini, S. (2005, June). Text structure instruction in social studies in the primary grades. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
37. Stanovich, K. E. (1991). Discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Has intelligence led us astray? Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 7-29.
38. Taylor, M. B., & Williams, J. P. (1983). Comprehension of learning disabled readers: Task and text variations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 743-751.
39. Torgesen, J. K., Alexander, A. W., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Coeller, K. K. S., & Conway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 33-58.
40. van den Broek, P., & Kremer, K. E. (2000). The mind in action: What it means to comprehend during reading. In B. M. Taylor, M. F. Graves, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Reading for meaning (pp. 1-31). New York: Teachers College Press.
41. Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L. S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 137-146.
42. Vellutino, F. R., Scanion, D. M., & Jaccard, J. (2003). Toward distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as primary sources of difficulty in learning to read: A two-year follow-up of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers. In B. R. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties (pp. 73-120). New York: York Press.
43. Wilder, A. A., & Williams, J. P. (2001). Students with severe learning disabilities can learn and transfer higher-order comprehension skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 268-278.
44. Williams, J. P. (1969). Training kindergarten children to discriminate letter-like forms. American Educational Research Journal, 6, 501-514.
45. Williams, J. P. (1975). Training children to copy and to discriminate letter-like forms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 790-795.
46. Williams, J. P. (1977). Building perceptual and cognitive strategies into a reading curriculum. In A. Reber & D. Scarborough (Eds.), Towards a psychology of reading (pp. 257-288). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
47. Williams, J. P. (1979). The ABDs of reading: A program for the (earning disabled. In L. B. Resnick & P. A. Weaver (Eds.), Theory and practice of early reading: Vol. 3 (pp. 179-195). Hillsdale, NJ: Law- rence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
48. Williams, J. P. (1980). Teaching decoding with an emphasis on phoneme analysis and phoneme blending. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 1-15.
49. Williams, J. P. (1993). Comprehension of students with and without learning disabilities: Identification of narrative themes and idiosyncratic text representations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 631-641.
50. Williams, J. P., & Ackerman, M. D. (1971). Simultaneous and successive discrimination learning as a function of stimulus similarity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 132-137.
51. Williams, J. P., Blumberg, E. L., & Williams, D. V. (1970). Cues used in visual word recognition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 310-315.
52. Williams, J. P., Hall, K. M., & Lauer, K. D. (2004). Building the basis of comprehension instruction: Teaching expository text structure to young at-risk learners. Exceptionality, 12, 129-144.
53. Williams, J. P., Hall, K. M., Lauer, K. D., Stafford, K. B., DeSisto, L. A., & deCani, J. S. (2005). Expository text comprehension in the primary grade classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 538-550.
54. Wise, B. W., Ring, J., & Olson, R. K. (1999). Training phonological awareness with and without attention to articulation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 271-304.
55. Wise, B.W., Ring, J., & Olson, R. K. (2000). Individual differences in gains from computer-assisted remedial reading with more emphasis on phonological analysis or accurate reading in context. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 197-235.
56. Wolf, M., Miller, L., & Donnelly, K. (2002). Retrieval, automaticity, vocabulary elaboration, orthography (RAVE-O): A comprehensive, fluency-based reading intervention program. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 375-386.