Inducing bone growth using extracellular matrix proteins

Bio-Implant Interface: Improving Biomaterials and Tissue Reactions

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 261-281

  Lyngstadaas, Staale Petter ^a   Ellingsen, Jan Eirik ^a   Spahr, Axel ^b   Slaby, Ivan ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

^c BIORA AB   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646512990     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9780203491430     Document Type: Chapter

References (78)

1. Yang, S. et al., The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. II. Rapid prototyping techniques, Tissue Eng., 8, 1, 2002.
2. de Bruijn, J.D. et al., Bone induction by implants with cultured bone marrow cells, Adv. Dent. Res., 13, 74, 1999.
3. Cooper, L.F. et al., Incipient analysis of mesenchymal stem cell-derived osteogenesis, J. Dent. Res., 80, 314, 2001.
4. Butler, D.L., Goldstein, S.A., and Guilak, F., Functional tissue engineering: the role of biomechanics, J. Biomech. Eng., 122, 570, 2000.
5. Badylak, S.F. et al., Marrow-derived cells populate scaffolds composed of xenogeneic extracellular matrix, Exp. Hematol., 29, 1310, 2001.
6. Kyriakides, T.R. et al., Regulation of angiogenesis and matrix remodeling by localized, matrix-mediated antisense gene delivery, Mol. Ther., 3, 842, 2001.
7. Abron, A. et al., Evaluation of a predictive model for implant surface topography effects on early osseointegration in the rat tibia model, J. Prosthet. Dent., 85, 40, 2001.
8. 2 blasting: tensile testing of bone attachment by using coin-shaped implants, Biomaterials, 23, 4211, 2002.
9. LeGeros, R.Z., Properties of osteoconductive biomaterials: calcium phosphates, Clin. Orthop., 395, 81, 2002.
10. Hulshoff, J.E. et al., Interfacial phenomena: an in vitro study of the effect of calcium phosphate (CA-P) ceramic on bone formation, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 40, 464, 1998.
11. Bucholz, R.W., Nonallograft osteoconductive bone graft substitutes, Clin. Orthop., 395, 44, 2002.
12. Lavos-Valereto, I.C. et al., In vitro and in vivo biocompatibility testing of Ti-6Al- 7Nb alloy with and without plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coating, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 58, 727, 2001.
13. Champagne, C.M. et al., Macrophage cell lines produce osteoinductive signals that include bone morphogenetic protein-2, Bone, 30, 26, 2002.
14. Kim, Y.W. et al., Effects of organic matrix proteins on the interfacial structure at the bone-biocompatible nacre interface in vitro, Biomaterials, 23, 2089, 2002.
15. Sampson, N.S., Mrksich, M., and Bertozzi, C.R., Surface molecular recognition, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 98, 12870, 2001.
16. Sinha, R.K. and Tuan, R.S., Regulation of human osteoblast integrin expression by orthopedic implant materials, Bone, 18, 451, 1996.
17. Irvine, D.J. et al., Simulations of cell-surface integrin binding to nanoscaleclustered adhesion ligands, Biophys. J., 82, 120, 2002.
18. Langille, R.M. Differentiation of craniofacial mesenchyme, in Bone: Differentiation and Morphogenesis, vol. 9, Hall, B.K., Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1994.
19. Shah, A.K. et al., Mechanism of BMP-2-stimulated adhesion of osteoblastic cells to titanium alloy, Biol. Cell, 91, 131, 1999.
20. Stenport, V.F. et al., Systemically administered human growth hormone improves initial implant stability: an experimental study in the rabbit, Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res., 3, 135, 2001.
21. Ferretti, C. and Ripamonti, U., Human segmental mandibular defects treated with naturally derived bone morphogenetic proteins, J. Craniofac. Surg., 13, 434, 2002.
22. Laato, M. et al., Interferon-gamma-induced inhibition of wound healing in vivo and in vitro, Ann. Chir. Gynaecol., 90, 215, 19, 2001.
23. Doukas, J. et al., Matrix immobilization enhances the tissue repair activity of growth factor gene therapy vectors, Hum. Gene Ther., 12, 783, 2001.
24. Salih, E. et al., Natural variation in the extent of phosphorylation of bone phosphoproteins as a function of in vivo new bone formation induced by demineralized bone matrix in soft tissue and bony environments, Biochem. J., 364, 465, 2002.
25. Schierano, G. et al., In vitro effect of transforming growth factor-beta on adhesion molecule expression by human gingival fibroblasts cultured in the presence of a titanium abutment, J. Periodontol., 72, 1658, 2001.
26. Zhao, M. et al., Bone morphogenetic protein receptor signalling is necessary for normal murine postnatal bone formation, J. Cell Biol., 157, 1049, 2002.
27. Groessner-Schreiber, B. and Tuan, R.S., Enhanced extracellular matrix production and mineralization by osteoblasts cultured on titanium surfaces in vitro, J. Cell Sci., 101, 209, 1992.
28. Derhami, K. et al., Quantifying the adherence of fibroblasts to titanium and its enhancement by substrate-attached material, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 52, 315, 2000.
29. Cook, S.D. et al., The effect of demineralized bone matrix gel on bone ingrowth and fixation of porous implants, J. Arthroplasty, 17, 402, 2002.
30. Linez-Bataillon, P. et al., In vitro MC3T3 osteoblast adhesion with respect to surface roughness of Ti6Al4V substrates, Biomol. Eng., 19, 133, 2002.
31. Itoh, D. et al., Enhancement of osteogenesis on hydroxyapatite surface coated with synthetic peptide (EEEEEEEPRGDT) in vitro, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 62, 292, 2002.
32. Grzesik, W.J. et al., Age-related changes in human proteoglycans structure: impact of osteogenesis imperfecta, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 43638, 2002.
33. McKee, M.D. and Nanci, A., Osteopontin at mineralised tissue interfaces in bone, teeth and osseointegrated implants: ultrastructural distribution and implications for mineralised tissue formation, turnover and repair, Microsc. Res. Tech., 33, 141, 1996.
34. Ferrara, D. et al., Three-dimensional cultures of normal human osteoblasts: proliferation and differentiation potential in vitro and upon ectopic implantation in nude mice, Bone, 30, 718, 2002.
35. Karsdal, M.A. et al., MMP-dependent activation of latent TGF-b controls the conversion of osteoblasts into osteocytes by blocking osteoblast apoptosis, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 44061, 2002.
36. Gurevich, O. et al., Fibrin microbeads for isolating and growing bone marrowderived progenitor cells capable of forming bone tissue, Tissue Eng., 8, 661, 2002.
37. Stephansson, S.N., Byers, B.A., and Garcia, A.J., Enhanced expression of the osteoblastic phenotype on substrates that modulate fibronectin conformation and integrin receptor binding, Biomaterials, 23, 2527, 2002.
38. Ebara, S. and Nakayama, K., Mechanism for the action of bone morphogenetic proteins and regulation of their activity, Spine, 27, 10, 2002.
39. Chipperfield, H. et al., Heparan sulfates isolated from adult neural progenitor cells can direct phenotypic maturation, Int. J. Dev. Biol., 46, 661, 2002.
40. Raouf, A. et al., Lumican is a major component of the bone matrix, Matrix Biol., 21, 361, 2002.
41. Fitzgerald, J., Tay-Ting, S., and Bateman, J.F., WARP is a new member of the von Willebrand factor A-domain superfamily of extracellular matrix proteins, FEBS Lett., 517, 61, 2002.
42. Weiss, S. et al., Systemic regulation of distraction osteogenesis: a cascade of biochemical factors, J. Bone Miner. Res., 17, 1280, 2002.
43. Wittrant, Y. et al., Osteoprotegrin differentially regulates protease expression in osteoclast cultures, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 293, 38, 2002.
44. Letic-Gavrilovic, A., Scandurra, R., and Abe, K., Genetic potential of interfacial guided osteogenesis in implant devices, Dent. Mater. J., 19, 99, 2000.
45. Puleo, D.A. and Nanci, A., Understanding and controlling the bone-implant interface, Biomaterials, 20, 2311, 1999.
46. Veis, A. et al., Specific amelogenin gene splice products have signalling effects on cells in culture and in implants in vivo, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 41263, 2000.
47. Boyan, B.D. et al., Porcine fetal enamel matrix derivative enhances bone formation induced by demineralised freeze dried bone allograft in vivo, J. Periodontol., 71, 1278, 2000.
48. Sculean, A. et al., Healing of fenestration-type defects following treatment with guided tissue regeneration or enamel matrix proteins: an experimental study in monkeys, Clin. Oral Investig., 4, 50, 2000.
49. Kawana, F. et al., Porcine enamel matrix derivative enhances trabecular bone regeneration during wound healing of injured rat femur, Anat. Rec., 264, 438, 2001.
50. Tonetti, M.S. et al., Enamel matrix proteins in the regenerative therapy of deep intrabony defects, J. Clin. Periodontol., 29, 317, 2002.
51. Ohyama, M. et al., Effect of enamel matrix derivative on the differentiation of C2C12 cells, J. Periodontol., 73, 543, 2002.
52. Rosen, P.S. and Reynolds, M.A., A retrospective case series comparing the use of demineralised freeze-dried bone allograft and freeze-dried bone allograft combined with enamel matrix derivative for the treatment of advanced osseous lesions, J. Periodontol., 73, 942, 2002.
53. Spahr, A. et al., Expression of amelin and trauma-induced dentin formation, Clin. Oral Investig., 6, 51, 2002.
54. Nakamura, Y. et al., The induction of reparative dentine by enamel proteins, Int. Endodont. J., 35, 407, 2002.
55. Spahr, A. and Hammarstrom, L., Response of dental follicular cells to the exposure of denuded enamel matrix in rat molars, Eur. J. Oral Sci., 107, 360, 1999.
56. Tokiyasu, Y. et al., Enamel factors regulate expression of genes associated with cementoblasts, J. Periodontol., 71, 1829, 2000.
57. Hamamoto, Y. et al., Effects of distribution of the enamel matrix derivative Emdogain in the periodontal tissues of rat molars transplanted to the abdominal wall, Dent. Traumatol., 18, 12, 2002.
58. Dean, D.D. et al., Effect of porcine fetal enamel matrix derivative on chondrocyte proliferation, differentiation, and focal factor production is dependent on cell maturation state, Cells Tiss. Organs, 171, 117, 2002.
59. Shimizu-Ishiura, M. et al., Effects of enamel matrix derivative to titanium implantation in rat femurs, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 60, 269, 2002.
60. Casati, M.Z. et al., Enamel matrix derivative and bone healing after guided bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects around implants: a histomorphometric study in dogs, J. Periodontol., 73, 789, 2002.
61. Hammarström, L., Heijl, L., and Gestrelius, S., Periodontal regeneration in a buccal dehiscence model in monkeys after application of enamel matrix proteins, J. Clin. Periodontol., 24, 669, 1997.
62. Heijl, L. et al., Enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain“) in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects, J. Clin. Periodontol., 24, 705, 1997.
63. Hammarström, L., Enamel matrix, cementum development and regeneration, J. Clin. Periodontol., 24, 658, 1997.
64. Fincham, A.G. et al., Self-assembly of a recombinant amelogenin protein generates supramolecular structures, J. Struct. Biol., 112, 103, 1994.
65. Gestrelius, S. et al., Formulation of enamel matrix derivative for surface coating: kinetics and cell colonization, J. Clin. Periodontol., 24, 678, 1997.
66. Lyngstadaas, S.P. et al., Autocrine growth factors in human periodontal ligament cells cultured on enamel matrix derivative, J. Clin. Periodontol., 28, 181, 2001.
67. Suzuki, N. et al., Attachment of human periodontal ligament cells to enamel matrix-derived protein is mediated via interaction between BSP-like molecules and integrin alpha (v) beta-3, J. Periodontol., 72, 1520, 2001.
68. Cerny, R. et al., A novel gene expressed in rat molars: codes for proteins with cell binding domains, J. Bone Miner. Res., 11, 883, 1996.
69. Fong, C.D., Slaby, I., and Hammarström, L., Amelin: an enamel-related protein, transcribed in the cells of the epithelial root sheath, J. Bone Miner. Res., 11, 892, 1996.
70. Fong, C.D. et al., Expression patterns of RNAs for amelin and amelogenin in developing rat molars and incisors, Adv. Dent. Res., 10, 195, 1996.
71. Krebsbach, P.H. et al., Full-length sequence, localization, and chromosomal mapping of ameloblastin: a novel tooth-specific gene, J. Biol. Chem., 271, 4431, 1996.
72. Lee, S.K. et al., Ameloblastin expression in rat incisors and human tooth germs, Int. J. Dev. Biol., 40, 1141, 1996.
73. Fong, C.D. et al., Sequential expression of an amelin gene in mesenchymal and epithelial cells during odontogenesis in rats, Eur. J. Oral Sci., 106, 324, 1998.
74. Bleicher, F. et al., Sequential expression of matrix protein genes in developing rat teeth, Matrix Biol., 18, 133, 1999.
75. Brookes, S.J. et al., Amelin extracellular processing and aggregation during rat incisor amelogenesis, Arch. Oral Biol., 46, 201 2001.
76. Dhamija, S. and Krebsbach, P.H., Role of Cbfa1 in ameloblast gene transcription, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 35159, 2001.
77. Arana-Chavez, V.E. and Nanci, A., High-resolution immunocytochemistry of noncollagenous matrix proteins in rat mandibles processed with microwave irradiation, J. Histochem. Cytochem., 49, 1099, 2001.
78. Zambotti, A. et al., Characterization of an osteoblast-specific enhancer element in the CBFA1 gene, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 41497, 2002