The isolation, primacy, and recency effects predicted by an adaptive LTD/LTP threshold in postsynaptic cells

Cognitive Science

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 243-275

  Sikström, Sverker ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY COGNITIVE SCIENCE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Adaptive LTP LTD threshold; Isolation effect; Model; Neural network; Primacy; Recency; Synaptic plasticity

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646484805     PISSN: 03640213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_55     Document Type: Article

References (106)

1. Amit, D. J., & Tsodyks, M. (1991). Quantitative study of attractor neural networks retrieving at low spike rates: I. Substrate-spikes, rates, and neuronal gain. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 2, 259-274.
2. Anderson, M. C., & Neely, J. H. (1996). Interference and inhibition in memory retrieval. In E. L. Bjork & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Memory: Handbook of perception and cognition (2nd ed., pp. 237-313). San Diego, CA: Academic.
3. Atkinson, R., & Shiffrin, R. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. Spence & J. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 2, pp. 89-195). New York: Academic.
4. Bear, M. F. (1996). Progress in Understanding NMDA-receptor-dependent synaptic plasticity in the visual cortex. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 90, 223-227.
5. Bear, M. F., Cooper, L. N., & Ebner, F. F. (1987, July 3). A physiological basis for a theory of synaptic modification. Science, 237, 42-48.
6. Bienenstock, E. L., Cooper, L. N., & Munro, P. W. (1982). Theory for the development of neuron selectivity: Orientation specificity and binocular interaction in visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 2(1), 32-48.
7. Bjork, R. A., & Whitten, W. B. (1974). Recency-sensitive retrieval processes in long-term memory free recall. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 173-189.
8. Brown, G. D. A., Preece, T., & Hulme, C. (2000). Oscillator-based memory for serial order. Psychological Review, 107, 127-181.
9. Burgess, N., & Hitch, G. J. (1999). Memory for serial order: A network model of the phonological loop and its timing. Psychological Review, 106, 551-581.
10. Carlesimo, G. A., Marfia, G. A., Loasses, A., & Caltagirone, C. (1996). Recency effect in anterograde amnesia: Evidence for distinct memory stores underlying enhanced retrieval of terminal items in immediate and delayed recall paradigms. Neuropsychologia, 34, 177-184.
11. Ceccarelli, B., & Hurlbut, W. P. (1980). Vesicle hypothesis of the release of quanta of acetylcholine. Physiological. Reviews, 60, 396-441.
12. Christianson, S.-Å., & Loftus, E. F. (1987). Memory for traumatic events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1, 225-239.
13. Clothiaux, E. E., Bear, M. E., & Cooper, L. N. (1991). Synaptic plasticity in visual cortex: Comparison of theory with experiment. Journal of Neurophysiology, 66, 1785-1804.
14. Cooper, L. N. (1995). How we learn: How we remember: Toward an understanding of brain and neural systems: Selected papers of Leon N Cooper. London, World Scientific.
15. Cooper, L. N., Liberman, F., & Oja, E. (1979). A theory for the acquisition and loss of neuron specificity in visual cortex. Biological Cybernetics, 33(1), 9-28.
16. Craik, F. I. M. (1970). The fate of primary memory items in free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 143-148.
17. Craik, F. I. M., & Birtwistle, J. (1971). Proactive inhibition in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 91, 120-123.
18. Crick, F. H. C. (1989, June 12). The recent excitement about neural networks. Nature, 337, 127-132.
19. Dalezman, J. J. (1976). Effects of output order on immediate, delayed, and final recall performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 597-608.
20. Darley, C. F., & Glass, A. L. (1975). Effects of rehearsal and serial list position on recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 104, 453-458.
21. Davelaar, E. J., Goshen-Gottstein, Y., Ashkenazi, A., Haarmann, H. J., & Usher, M. (2005). The demise of short-term memory revisited: Empirical and computational investigations of recency effects. Psychological Review, 112, 3-42.
22. Duncan, M., & Lewandowsky, S. (in press). The time course of response suppression: No evidence for a gradual release from inhibition. Memory.
23. Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., & Lackey, S. (1989). Bizarre imagery, interference, and distinctiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 137-146.
24. Ellis, N. R., Detterman, D. K., Runcie, D., McCarver, R. B., & Craig, E. (1971). Amnesic effects in short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 357-361.
25. Farrell, S., & Lewandowsky, S. (2002). An endogenous distributed model of ordering in serial recall. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 59-79.
26. Fischler, I., Rundus, D., & Atkinson, R. C. (1970). Effects of overt rehearsal procedures on free recall. Psychonomic Science, 19, 249-250.
27. Frégnac, Y., & Shulz, D. (1994). Models of synaptic plasticity and cellular analogs of learning in the development and adult vertebrate visual cortex. Advances in Neural and Behavioral Development, 4, 149-252.
28. Froemke, R. C., & Dan, Y. (2002). Spike-timing-dependent synaptic modification induced by natural spike trains. Nature, 416, 433-438.
29. Gershberg, F. B., & Shimamura, A. P. (1994). Serial position in implicit and explicit tests of memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1370-1378.
30. Glanzer, M. (1972). Storage mechanisms in recall. In G. H. Bower and J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 5, pp. 129-193). New York, Academic.
31. Glanzer, M., & Cunitz, A. (1966). Two storage mechanism in free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 351-360.
32. Glenberg, A. M., Bradley, M. M., Kraus, T. A., & Renzaglia, G. J. (1983). Studies of the long-term recency effect: Support of the contextually guided retrieval hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 231-255.
33. Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., & Levine, W. H. (2002). Memory load interference in syntactic processing. Psychological Science, 13, 425-430.
34. Green, T. (1956). Surprise as a factor in the von Restorff effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52, 340-344.
35. Hebb, D. O. (2002). The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. (Original work published 1949)
36. Henson, R. N. A. (1996). Short-term memory for serial order. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cambridge University, Cambridge, England.
37. Henson, R. N. A. (1998). Short-term memory for serial order: The start-end model. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 73-137.
38. Hopfield, J. J. (1982). Neural networks and physical systems with emergent computational abilities. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 81, 3088-3092.
39. Hopfield, J. J. (1984). Neurons with graded responses have collective computational abilities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 81, 3008-3092.
40. Howard, M. W., & Kahana, M. J. (2002). A distributed representation of temporal context. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 46, 269-299.
41. Hunt, R. R., & Elliot, J. M. (1980). The role of nonsemantic information in memory: Orthographic distinctiveness effects on retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 49-74.
42. Hunt, R. R., & Lamb, C. A. (2001). What causes the isolation effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1359-1366.
43. Hunt, R. R., & Mitchell, D. B. (1982). Independent effects of semantic and nonsemantic distinctiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 8, 81-87:
44. Jahr, C. F. (2003). Drooling and stuttering, or do synapses whisper? Trends in Neurosciences, 26, 7-9.
45. Jenkins, W. O., & Postman, L. (1948). Isolation and spread of effect in serial learning. American Journal of Psychology, 61, 214-221.
46. Kahana, M. J. (1996). Associative retrieval processes in free recall. Memory and Cognition, 24, 103-109.
47. Katz, B. (1969). The release of neural transmitter substances. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
48. Kelley, M. R., & Naime, J. S. (2001). Von Restorff revisited: Isolation, generation, and memory for order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 27, 54-66.
49. Laing, C. R., & Chow, C. C. (2002). A spiking neuron model for binocular rivalry. Journal of Computational Neuro-science, 12, 39-53.
50. Levy, W. B., Brassel, S. E., & Moore, S. D (1983). Partial quantification of the associative synaptic learning rule of the dentate gyrus. Neuroscience, 8, 799-808.
51. Lewandowsky, S. (1991). Gradual unlearning and catastrophic interference: A comparison of distributed architectures. In W. E. Hockley & S. Lewandowsky (Eds.), Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory in honor of Bennet B. Murdock (pp. 445-476). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
52. Lewandowsky, S., & Li, S. (1995). Catastrophic interference in neural networks: Causes, solutions and data. In F. N. Dempster & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Interference and inhibition in cognition (pp. 329-361). San Diego, CA: Academic.
53. Lewandowsky, S., & Murdock, B. B. (1989). Memory for serial order. Psychological Review, 96, 25-57.
54. Lewis, R. L. (1996). Interference in short-term memory: The magical number two (or three) in sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 93-115.
55. Lynch, M. (2003). Long-term potentiation and memory. Physiological Reviews, 84, 87-136.
56. Markram, H., Lubke, J., Frotscher, M., & Sakmann, B. (1997, January 10). Regulation of synaptic efficacy by coincidence of postsynaptic APs and EPSPs. Science, 275, 213-215.
57. McArthur, L. Z. (1981). What grabs you? The role of attention in impression formation and causal attribution. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 1, pp. 201-246). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
58. McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., & O'Reilly, R. C. (1995). Why are there complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychological Review, 102, 419-457.
59. McCloskey, M., & Cohen, N. J. (1989). Catastrophic interference in connectionist networks: The sequential learning paradigm. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 24, pp. 109-164). San Diego, CA: Academic.
60. McConnell, A. R., Sherman, S. J., & Hamilton, D. L. (1994). Illusory correlation in the perception of groups: An extension of the distinctiveness-based account. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 414-429.
61. Metcalfe, J. (1993a). Monitoring and gain control in an episodic memory model: Relation to the P300 event-related potential. In A. F. Collins, S. E. Gathercole, M. A. Conway, & P. E. Morris (Eds.), Theories of memory (pp. 327-353). Hove, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
62. Metcalfe, J. (1993b). Novelty monitoring, metacognition, and control in a composite holographic associative recall model. Psychological Review, 100, 3-22.
63. Miller, K. D. (1990). Correlation-based models of neural development. In M. A. Gluck, D. E. Rumelhart (Eds.), Neuroscience and connectionist theory (pp. 267-353). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
64. Minsky, M. L., & Papert, S. A. (1988). Perceptrons: An introduction to computational geometry (Expanded ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.
65. Modigliani, V., & Hedges, D. G. (1987). Distributed rehearsals and the primacy effect in single-trial free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 426-436.
66. Murdock, B. B. (1960). The distinctiveness of stimuli. Psychological Review, 67, 16-31.
67. Murdock, B. B. J. (1962). The serial position effect of free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 482-488.
68. Nairne, J. S. (1988). A framework for interpreting recency effects in immediate serial recall. Memory and Cognition 16, 343-352.
69. Nairne, J. S. (1990). A feature model of immediate memory. Memory and Cognition, 18, 251-269.
70. Neath, I. (1993). Contextual and distinctive processes and the serial position functions. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 820-840.
71. Neath, I. (1999). Modelling the disruptive effects of irrelevant speech on order information. International Journal of Psychology, 34, 410-418.
72. Neter, J., Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., & Wasserman (1996). Applied linear statistical models. Chicago: Irwin.
73. Nicoll, R. A., Kauer, J. A., & Malenka, J. A. (1992). The current excitement in long-term potentiation. Neuron, 1(2), 97-103.
74. Oberauer, K. (2003). Understanding serial position curves in short-term recognition and recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 469-483.
75. O'Brian, E. J., & Myers, J. L. (1985). When comprehension difficulty improves memory for text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 12-21.
76. O'Reilly, R. (1996). Biologically plausible error-driven learning using local activation differences: The generalized recirculation algorithm. Neural Computation, 8, 895-938.
77. Pezdek, K., Whetstone, T., Reynolds, K., Askari, N., & Dougherty, T. (1989). Memory for real-world scenes: The role of consistency with schema expectation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 587-595.
78. Phillips, J. L., Shiffrin, R. M., & Atkinson, R. C. (1967). The effects of list length on short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 6, 303-311.
79. Pillsbury, W. B., & Rausch, H. L. (1943). An extension of the Koler-Restorff inhibition phenomena. American Journal of Psychology, 56, 293-298.
80. Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: The effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical condition II: Current research and theory (pp. 64-69). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
81. Rioult-Pedotti, M. S., Friedman, D., & Donoghue, J. P. (2000, October 20). Learning-induced LTP in neocortex. Science, 290, 533-536.
82. Roberts, S., & Pashler, H. (2000). How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing in psychology. Psychological Review, 107, 358-367.
83. Roberts, S., & Pashler, H. (2002). Reply to Roders and Rowe (2002). Psychological Review, 109, 605.
84. Rubin, D. C., Hinton, S., & Wenzel, A. (1999). The precise time course of retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1161-1176.
85. Rubin, D. C., & Wenzel, A. E. (1996). One hundred years of forgetting: A quantitative description of retention. Psychological Review, 103, 734-760.
86. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986, October 9). Learning representation by backpropagating errors. Nature, 323, 533-536.
87. Schmidt, S. R. (1991). Can we have distinctive theory of memory? Memory and Cognition, 19, 523-542.
88. Sikström, S. (1999). Power function forgetting curves as an emergent property of biologically plausible neural networks model. International Journal of Psychology, 34, 460-464.
89. Sikström, S. (2000). The TECO theory and lawful dependency in successive episodic tests. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 693-728.
90. Sikström, S. (2001). The variance theory for the mirror effect. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 408-438.
91. Sikström, S. (2002). Forgetting curves: Implications for connectionist models. Cognitive Psychology, 45, 95-152.
92. Sikström, S., & Jaber, M. Y. (2002). The power integration diffusion (PID) model for production breaks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 118-126.
93. Simon, F., & Lewandowsky, S. (2002). An endogenous distributed model of ordering in serial recall. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 59-79.
94. Song, S., Miller, K. D., & Abbott, L. F. (2000). Competitive Hebbian learning though spike-timing-dependent synaptic plasticity. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 919-926.
95. Steinbach, J. H., & Stevens, C. F. (1976). Neuromuscular transmission. In R. Linás & W. Precht (Eds.), Frog Neurobiology. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
96. Tan, L., & Ward, G. (2000). A recency-based account of the primacy effect in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1589-1625.
97. Tsodyks, M. (2002). Spike-timing-dependent synaptic plasticity - The long road towards understanding neuronal mechanisms of learning and memory. Trends in Neurosciences, 25, 599-600.
98. Tulving, E. (1969, April 4). Retrograde amnesia in free recall. Science, 164, 88-90.
99. Wallace, W. P. (1965). Review of the historical, empirical, and theoretical status of the von Restorff phenomenon. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 410-424.
100. Watkins, M. J., & Peynircioglu, Z. F. (1983). Three recency effects at the same time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22, 375-384.
101. Waugh, N. C. (1969). Free recall of conspicuous items. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 8, 448-456.
102. Wixted, J. T., & McDowell, J. J. (1989). Contributions to the functional analysis of single-trial free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 685-697.
103. von der Malsburg, C. (1973). Self-organizing of orientation sensitive cells in the striate cortex. Kybernetic, 14, 85-100.
104. von Restorff, H. (1933). Über die Wirkung von Bereichsbildungen im Spurenfeld. Psychologische Forschung, 18, 299-342.
105. Wright, A. A., Santiago, H. C., Sands, S. F., Kendrick, D. F., & Cook, R. G. (1985, July 19). Memory processing of serial lists by pigeons, monkeys and people. Science, 229, 287-289.
106. Zipser, D., & Andersen, R. A. (1988, February 25). A back propagation programmed network that stimulates response properties of a subset of posterior parietal neurons. Nature, 331, 679-684.