Bayesian estimation of the timing and severity of a population bottleneck from ancient DNA

PLoS Genetics

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 451-460

  Chan, Yvonne L ^a   Anderson, Christian N K ^a   Hadly, Elizabeth A ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CONSERVATION BIOLOGY; DEMOGRAPHY; DISEASE SEVERITY; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; INBREEDING; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; POPULATION GENETICS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; GENE FREQUENCY; MAMMAL; POPULATION; POPULATION DENSITY; RODENT; STATISTICAL MODEL;

CTENOMYS; CTENOMYS SOCIABILIS; RODENTIA;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; DNA; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; GENE FREQUENCY; INBREEDING; MAMMALS; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; POPULATION; POPULATION DENSITY; RODENTIA; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 33646483919     PISSN: 15537390     EISSN: 15537404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020059     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Tavare S, Balding DJ, Griffiths RC, Donnelly P (1997) Inferring coalescence times from DNA sequence data. Genetics 145: 505-518.
2. Rosenberg NA, Nordborg M (2002) Genealogical trees, coalescent theory and the analysis of genetic polymorphisms. Nat Rev Genet 3: 380-390.
3. Rodrigo AG, Felsenstein J (1999) Coalescent approaches to HIV population genetics. In: Crandall KA, editor. The evolution of HIV. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 233-272.
4. Anderson CNK, Ramakrishnan U, Chan YL, Hadly EA (2005) Serial SimCoal: A population genetic model for data from multiple populations and points in time. Bioinformatics 21: 1733-1734.
5. Laval G, Excoffier L (2004) SIMCOAL 2.0: A program to simulate genomic diversity over large recombining regions in a subdivided population with a complex history. Bioinformatics 20: 2485-2487.
6. Beaumont MA, Zhang W, Balding DJ (2002) Approximate bayesian computation in population genetics. Genetics 162: 2025-2035.
7. The International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources [IUCN] (2004) 2004 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Gland (Switzerland): IUCN. Available: http://www.redlist.org. Accessed 23 March 2006.
8. Chan YL, Lacey EA, Pearson OP, Hadly EA (2005) Ancient DNA reveals Holocene loss of genetic diversity in a South American rodent. Biol Lett 1: 423-426.
9. Hadly EA, Van Tuinen M, Chan Y, Heiman K (2003) Ancient DNA evidence of prolonged population persistence with negligible genetic diversity in an endemic tuco-tuco (Ctenomys sociabilis). J Mammal 84: 403-417.
10. Lacey EA (2001) Microsatellite variation in solitary and social tuco-tucos: Molecular properties and population dynamics. Heredity 86: 628-637.
11. Kimura M (1983) The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge (United Kingdom): Cambridge University Press.
12. Lacy RC (1987) Loss of genetic diversity from managed populations: Interacting effects of drift, mutation, immigration, selections, and population subdivision. Conserv Biol 1: 143-158.
13. Nei M, Maruyama T, Chakraborty R (1975) The bottleneck effect and genetic variability. Evolution 29: 1-10.
14. Cornuet JM, Luikart G (1996) Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144: 2001-2014.
15. Luikart G, Allendorf FW, Cornuet JM, Sherwin WB (1998) Distortion of allele frequency distributions provides a test for recent population bottlenecks. J Hered 89: 238-247.
16. Maruyama T, Fuerst PA (1985) Number of alleles in a small population that was formed by a recent bottleneck. Genetics 111: 675-689.
17. Li H, Meng SJ, Men ZM, Fu YX, Zhang YP (2003) Genetic diversity and population history of Golden Monkeys. Genetics 164: 269-275.
18. Ramakrishnan U, Hadly EA, Mountain J (2005) Detecting historical bottlenecks using modern and ancient DNA. Mol Ecol 14: 2915-2922.
19. Drummond AJ, Pybus OG, Rambaut A, Forsberg R, Rodrigo AG (2003) Measurably evolving populations. Trends Ecol Evol 18: 481-488.
20. Gallardo MH, Kohler N, Araneda C (1995) Bottleneck effects in local populations of fossorial Ctenomys (Rodentia, Ctenomyidae) affected by vulcanism. Heredity 74: 638-646.
21. Barton NH, Charlesworth B (1984) Genetic revolutions, founder effects, and speciation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15: 133-164.
22. Reig OA, Busch C, Ortells MO, Contreras JR (1990) An overview of evolution, systematics, population biology, cytogenetics, molecular biology, and speciation in Ctenomys. In: Nevo E, Reig OA, editors. Evolution of subterranean mammals at the organismal and molecular levels. New York: Alan R. Liss, Inc. pp. 71-96.
23. Castillo AH, Cortinas MN, Lessa EP (2005) Rapid diversification of South American tuco-tucos (Ctenomys; Rodentia, Ctenomyidae): contrasting mitochondrial and nuclear intron sequences. J Mammal 86: 170-179.
24. Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2002) Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 617 p.
25. Lacey EA, Wieczorek JR (2003) Ecology of sociality in rodents: A ctenomyid perspective. J Mammal 84: 1198-1211.
26. Tsutsui ND, Suarez AV, Holway DA, Case TJ (2000) Reduced genetic variation and the success of an invasive species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 5948-5953.
27. Steinberg EK, Patton JL (2000) Genetic structure and the geography of speciation in subterranean rodents: Opportunities and constraints for evolutionary diversification. In: Lacey EA, Patton JL, Cameron GN, editors. Life underground: The biology of subterranean rodents. Chicago (Illinois): University of Chicago Press. pp. 301-331.
28. Hofreiter M, Jaenicke V, Serre D, von Haeseler A, Paabo S (2001) DNA sequences from multiple amplifications reveal artifacts induced by cytosine deamination in ancient DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 29: 4793-4799.
29. Haig SM (1998) Molecular contributions to conservation. Ecology 79: 413-425.
30. Montero EAC, Curzio DE, Silveira MJ (1983) La estratigrafia de la cueva Traful I (Provincia del Neuquen). Praehistoria 1: 9-160.
31. Pearson OP, Pearson AK (1981) La fauna mamiferos pequenos cerca de Cueva Traful, Argentina: pasado y presente. Praehistoria. 1: 211-224.
32. Lacey EA, Wieczorek JR (2004) Kinship in colonial tuco-tucos: Evidence from group composition and population structure. Behavioural Ecology 15: 988-996.
33. Lacey EA (2004) Sociality reduces individual direct fitness in a communally breeding rodent, the colonial tuco-tuco (Ctenomys sociabilis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56: 449-457.
34. Posada D, Crandall KA (1998) Modeltest: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
35. Hasegawa M, Kishino K, Yano T (1985) Dating the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Evol 22: 160-174.
36. Irwin DM, Kocher TD, Wilson AC (1991) Evolution of the cytochrome-B gene of mammals. J Mol Evol 32: 128-144.
37. Wilson AC, Cann RL, Carr SM, George M, Gyllensten UB, et al. (1985) Mitochondrial-DNA and two perspectives on evolutionary genetics. Biol J Linn Soc Lond 26: 375-400.
38. Smith AFM, Gelfand AE (1992) Bayesian statistics without tears - A sampling resampling perspective. Am Stat 46: 84-88.
39. Estoup A, Beaumont MA, Sennedot F, Moritz C, Cornuet JM (2004) Genetic analysis of complex demographic scenarios: Spatially expanding populations of the cane toad, Bufo marinus. Evolution 58: 2021-2036.
40. Leblois R, Rousset F, Estoup A (2004) Influence of spatial and temporal heterogeneities on the estimation of demographic parameters in a continuous population using individual microsatellite data. Genetics 166: 1081-1092.
41. Rozas J, Sánchez-DelBarrio JC, Messeguer X, Rozas R (2003) DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics 19: 2496-2497.
42. Watterson GA (1975) On the number of segregating sites in genetic models without recombination. Theor Popul Biol 7: 256-276.
43. Tajima F (1983) Evolutionary relationships of DNA sequences in finite populations. Genetics 105: 437-460.
44. Tajima F (1989) Statistical-method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123: 585-595.