Compatibility of three miticides with the predatory mites Neoseiulus californicus McGregor and Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot (Acari: Phytoseiidae)

HortScience

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 707-710

  Cloyd, Raymond A ^a   Galle, Cindy L ^b   Keith, Stephen R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b AllTech Research and Development   (United States)

Author keywords

Integrated pest management; Lethal effects; Natural enemies; Pesticides; Survival

Indexed keywords

GREENHOUSES; PLANTS (BOTANY); TOXICITY;

INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT; LETHAL EFFECTS; NATURAL ENEMIES; SURVIVAL;

PESTICIDES;

ARACHNIDS; BIOCIDES; PLANTS;

ACARI; ARANEAE; NEOSEIULUS CALIFORNICUS; PHYTOSEIIDAE; PHYTOSEIULUS PERSIMILIS; TETRANYCHIDAE; TETRANYCHUS URTICAE;

EID: 33646461310     PISSN: 00185345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21273/hortsci.41.3.707     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Blumel, S. and M. Gross. 2001. Effect of pesticide mixtures on the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis A.H. (Acarina, Phytoseiidae) in the laboratory. J. Appl. Entomol. 125:201-205.
2. Burgess, E.L. 1984. Integrated control of two-spotted spider mite on glasshouse roses, p. 257-261. In: Proc. 37th New Zealand Weed and Pest Control Conf., Christchurch.
3. Burnett, T. 1979. An acarine predatory-prey population infesting roses. Res. Pop. Ecol. (Kyoto) 20:227-234.
4. Carbonaro, M.A., D.E. Moreland, V.E. Edge, N. Motoyama, G.C. Rock, and W.C. Dauterman. 1986. Studies on the mechanisms of cyhexatin resistance in the twospotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 79:576-579.
5. Casey, C. and M. Parrella. 2002. Demonstration and implementation of a reduced risk pest management strategy in fresh cut roses. Inter. Org. Biolog. Control/Western Palaearctic Reg. Section Bull. 25:45-48.
6. Castagnoli, M., M. Liguori, S. Simoni, and C. Duso. 2005. Toxicity of some insecticides to Tetranychus urticae, Neoseiulus californicus and Tydeus californicus. BioControl 50:611-622.
7. Childers, C.C., R. Villanueva, H. Aguilar, R. Chewning, and J.P. Michaud. 2001. Comparative residual toxicities of pesticides to the predator Agistemus industani (Acari: Stigmaeidae) on citrus in Florida. Expt. Appl. Acarol. 25:461-474.
8. Cote, K.W., E.E. Lewis, and P.B. Schultz. 2002. Compatibility of acaricide residues with Phytoseiulus persimilis and their effects on Tetranychus urticae. HortScience 37(6):906-909.
9. Dittrich, V. 1975. Acaricide resistance in mites. Z. Angew. Entomol. 78:28-45.
10. Field, R.P., and M.A. Hoy. 1986. Evaluation of genetically improved strains of Metaseiulus occidentalis (Nesbitt) (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) for integrated control of spider mites on roses in greenhouses. Hilgardia 54:1-31.
11. Grafton-Cardwell, E.E. and M.A. Hoy. 1983. Comparative toxicity of avermectin B1 to the predator Metaseiulus occidentalis (Nesbitt) (Acari: Tetranychidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 76:1216-1220.
12. Hamlen, R. A. 1978. Biological control of spider mites on greenhouse ornamentals using predaceous mites. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 91:247-249.
13. Hamlen, R.A. and R.K. Lindquist. 1981. Comparison of two Phytoseiulus species as predators of twospotted spider mites on greenhouse ornamentals. Environ. Entomol. 10:524-527.
14. Helle, W. and M. W. Sabelis. 1985. Spider mites: Their biology, natural enemies and control. Volume 1B, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
15. James, D.G. 2002. Selectivity of the acaricide, bifenazate, and aphicide, pymetrozine, to spider mite predators in Washington hops. Intl. J. Acarol. 28(2):175-179.
16. Ludwig, S.W. and R.D. Oetting. 2001. Susceptibility of natural enemies to infection of Beauveria bassiana and impact of insecticides on Ipheseius degenerans (Acari: Phytoseiidae). J. Agr. Urban Entomol. 18(3):169-178.
17. Markkula, M., K. Tittanen, and H.M. T. Hokkanen. 1987. Failures of biological control of spider mites due to predatory mites or their users? Bull. Intl. Org. Biol. Integrated Control/West Palaearctic Reg. Sect. 10(2):108-110.
18. McClanahan, R.J. 1968. Influence of temperature on the reproductive potential of two mite predators of the two-spotted spider mite. Can. Entomol. 100(5):549-556.
19. McMurtry, J.A. 1982. The use of phytoseiid for biological control: progress and future prospects, p. 23-48. In: Recent advances in knowledge of Phytoseiidae. M.A. Hoy (ed.). Div. Agr. Sci. Calif. Publ. 3284. Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentacion, Madrid.
20. McMurtry, J.A. and B.A. Croft. 1997. Life-styles of phytoseiid mites and their roles in biological control. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 42:291-321.
21. Oomen, P.A., G. Romeijn, and G.L. Wiegers. 1991. Side-effects of 100 acaricides on the predatory mite Phytoselulus persimilis, collected and evaluated according to the EPPO guideline. Bul. Euro. Mediterranean Plant Protection Org. (OEPP/EPPO) 21:701-712.
22. Osborne, L.S. and F.L. Petitt. 1985. Insecticidal soap and the predatory mite, Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae), used in management of the twospotted spider mite (Acari: Tetranychidae) on greenhouse grown foliage plants. J. Econ. Entomol. 78:687-691.
23. Palevsky, E., H. Reuveny, O. Okonis, and U. Gerson. 1999. Comparative behavioural studies of larval and adult stages of the phytoseiids (Acari: Mesostigmata) Typhlodromus athiasae and Neoseiulus californicus. Expt. Appl. Acarol. 23:467-485.
24. Sabelis, M. W. 1981. Biological control of two-spotted spider mites using phtyoseiid predators. Part 1. Modeling the predator-prey interaction at the individual level. Agr. Res. Rpt. 910. Wageningen, The Netherlands.
25. SAS Institute. 2002. SAS/STAT users guide. v. 8.2. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, N.C.
26. Shipp, J.L., K. Wang, and G. Ferguson. 2000. Residual toxicity of avermectin b1 and pyridaben to eight commercially produced beneficial arthropod species used for control of greenhouse pests. Biolog. Control 17:125-131.
27. Simmonds, S.P. 1972. Observations on the control of Tetranychus urticae on roses by Phytoseiulus persimilis. Plant Pathol. 21:163-165.
28. Scopes, N.E.A. 1985. Red spider mite and the predator Phytoseiulus persimilis, p. 43-52. In: N.W. Hussey and N. Scopes (eds.). Biological pest control: The glasshouse experience. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, N.Y.
29. Spollen, K.M. and M.B. Isman. 1996. Acute and sublethal effects of neem insecticide on the commercial biological controls Phytoseiulus persimilis and Amblyseius cucumeris (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and Aphidoletes aphidimyza (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 89(6):1379-1386.
30. Stenseth, C. 1979. Effect of temperature and humidity on the development of Phytoseiulus persimilis and its ability to regulate populations of Tetranychus urticae (Acarina: Phytoseiidae, Tetranychidae). Entomoph. 249:311-317.
31. Thomson, W.T. 2001. Agricultural chemicals book I: Insecticides, acaricides, and ovicides. Thomson Publications, Fresno, Calif.
32. Ware, G.W. and D.M. Whitacre. 2004. The pesticide book. 6th ed. MeisterPro Info. Resources, Willoughby, Ohio.
33. Zhang, Z-Q. 2003. Mites of greenhouses: Identification, biology, and control. CAB Intl. Publ., Wallingford, Oxon, U.K.
34. Zhi-Qiang, Z. and J.P. Sanderson. 1990. Relative toxicity of abamectin to the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and twospotted spider mite (Acari: Tetranychidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 83(5):1783-1790.