Turbulence modelling of problem aerospace flows

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 261-283

  Tucker, Paul G ^a  

^a SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aerospace; DES; ILES; URANS; Wall distance

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; REYNOLDS NUMBER; SHEAR STRESS; TURBULENCE; WINGS;

DETACHED EDDY SIMULATION; MENTER SHEAR STRESS TRANSPORT; UNSTEADY REYNOLDS AVERAGED NAVIER-STOKES; WALL DISTANCE;

AERODYNAMICS;

AERODYNAMICS; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; REYNOLDS NUMBER; SHEAR STRESS; TURBULENCE; WINGS;

EID: 33646452425     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: 10970363     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.1120     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Spalart PR, Allmaras SR. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. La Recherche Aerospatiale 1994; 1:5-21.
2. Wilcox DC. Turbulence modelling for CFD, DCW Industries, 1998.
3. Menter FR. Zonal two equation k-ω turbulence models for aerodynamic flows. AIAA Paper AIAA-93-2906, 1993.
4. Davidson L. Prediction of the flow around an airfoil using a Reynolds stress model. ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering 1995; 117:50-57.
5. Gatski TB, Speziale CG. On explicit algebraic stress models for complex turbulent flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1993; 254:59-78.
6. Shur M, Spalart PR, Strelets M, Travin A. Detached-eddy simulation of an aerofoil at high angle of attack. Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Engineering Turbulence Modelling and Measurements, Ajaccio, Corsica, France, 1999; 669-678.
7. Tucker PG, Davidson L. Zonal k-l based large eddy simulations. Computers and Fluids 2003; 33:267-287.
8. Davidson L, Dahlstrom S. Hybrid LES-RANS: an approach to making LES applicable at high Reynolds number. In Proceedings of CHT-04, Advances in Computational Heat Transfer III, de Vahl Davis G, Leonardi E (eds). Paper Number CHT-04-103 (ISBN: 1-5670-174-2), 2004.
9. Rollet-Miet P, Luarence D, Ferziger J. LES and RANS of turbulent flow in tube bundles. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 1999; 20:241-254.
10. Squires KD, Forsythe JR, Morton SA, Strang WZ, Wurtzler KE, Tomaro RF, Grismer MJ, Spalart PR. Progress on detached-eddy simulation of massively separated flows. AIAA Paper AIAA-2002-1021, 2002.
11. Forsythe JR, Hoffmann KA, Squires KD. Detached-eddy simulation with compressibility corrections applied to a supersonic axisymmetric base flow. AIAA Paper AIAA-2002-0586, 2002.
12. Mary I, Sagaut P. Large eddy simulation of flow around an airfoil near stall. AIAA Journal 2002; 40(6):1139-1145.
13. Spyropoulos ET, Blaisdell GA. Large-eddy simulation of a spatially evolving supersonic turbulent boundary layer flow. AIAA Journal 1998; 36(11):1983-1990.
14. Kravchenko AG, Moin P. On the effect of numerical errors in large-eddy simulations of turbulent flows. Journal of Computational Physics 1997; 131:310-322.
15. Garnier E, Mosi M, Saguat P, Comte P, Deville M. On the use of shock-capturing shemes for large-eddy simulation. Journal of Computational Physics 1999; 153:273-311.
16. Roe PL. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors and difference scheme. Journal of Computational Physics 1981: 46:357-378.
17. Dahlstrom S, Davidson L. Large eddy simulation of the flow around an airfoil. AIAA Paper AIAA 2001-0425, 2001.
18. Strelets M. Detached eddy simulation of massively separated flows. AIAA Paper 2001-0879, 2001.
19. Boris JP, Grinstein FF, Oran ES, Kolbe RL. New insights into large eddy simulation. Fluid Dynamis Research 1992; 10:199-228.
20. Fureby C, Grinstein F. Towards large eddy simulation of flows in complex geometries. AIAA Paper 98-2806, 1998.
21. Tucker PG. Novel MILES computations for jet flows and noise. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 2004; 25(4):625-635.
22. Tucker PG. Hybrid MILES-RANS method for more dissipative solvers and the use of non-linear LES, AIAA Paper AIAA-2004-0071, 2004.
23. Sethian JA. Fast marching methods. SIAM Review 1999; 41(2):199-235.
24. Wigton LB. Optimizing CFD codes and algorithms for use on Cray computers. Frontier of Computational Fluid Dynamics, Caughey DA, Hafez MM (eds). World Scientific: Singapore, 1998; 1-15 (Chapter 16).
25. Boger DA. Efficient method for calculating wall proximity. AIAA Journal 2001; 39(12):2404-2406.
26. Tucker PG. Differential equation based wall distance computation for DES and RANS. Journal of Computational Physics 2003; 190(1):229-248.
27. Rumsey CL, Lee-Rausch EM, Watson RD. Three-dimensional effects on multi-element high lift computations. AIAA Paper 2002-0845, 2002.
28. Temmerman L, Leschziner MA, Hanjalic K. A-priori studies of a near-wall model within a hybrid LES/RANS scheme. Engineering Turbulence Modelling and Experiments - 5, Rodi W, Fueyo N (eds). Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2002; 317-326.
29. Morton SA, Forysthe JR, Mitchell AM, Hajek D. DES and RANS simulations of delta wing vortical flows, AIAA paper 2002-0587, January 2002.
30. Spalart P, Hedges L, Shur M, Travin A. Simulation of active flow control on a stalled airfoil. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 2003; 71:361-373.
31. Piomelli U. High Reynolds number calculations using the dynamic subgrid-scale stress model. Physics Fluids 1993; 5:1484-1490.
32. Wei T, Willmarth WW. Reynolds-number effects on the structure of a turbulent channel flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1989; 204:57-90.
33. Kosovic B. Subgrid scale modelling for the large eddy simulation of high Reynolds number boundary layers. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1997; 336:151-182.
34. Yoshizawa A. Bridging between eddy-viscosity-type and second order models using a two-scale DIA. Ninth International Symposium On Turbulent Shear Flow, Kyoto, vol. 3, 1993; 23.1.1-23.1.6.