Entanglement, knowledge, and their possible effects on the outcomes of blinded trials of homeopathic provings

Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 271-279

  Milgrom, Lionel R ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PLACEBO;

ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; HOMEOPATHY; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; KNOWLEDGE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTUM MECHANICS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; HOMEOPATHY; HUMANS; PLACEBO EFFECT; QUANTUM THEORY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; RESEARCH DESIGN; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33646447192     PISSN: 10755535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/acm.2006.12.271     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Shang A, Huwiler-Muntener K, Nartey L, et al. Are the clinical effects of homeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homeopathy and allopathy. Lancet 2005;366:726-732.
2. Vandenbroukc JP. Homeopathy and the "growth of truth." Lancet 2005;366:691-692.
3. Bell IR. All evidence is equal, but some evidence is more equal than others: Can logic prevail over emotion in the homeopathy debate? J Altern Complement Med 2005;11:763-769.
4. Frass M, Schuster E, Muchitsch I, et al. Bias in the trial and reporting of trials of homeopathy: A fundamental breakdown in peer review and standards? J Altern Complement Med 2005;11:780-782.
5. Kienle H. Failure to exclude false negative bias: A fundamental flaw in the trial of Shang et al. J Altern Complement Med 2005;11:783.
6. Peters D. Shang et al. Carelessness, collusion, or conspiracy? J Altern Complement Med 2005;11:779-780.
7. Sherr J. The Dynamics and Methodology of Homeopathic Provings. West Malvern, UK: Dynamis Books, 1994.
8. Walach H. The pillar of homeopathy: Remedy provings in a scientific framework. Br Horn J 1997;86:219-224.
9. Lewith GT, Brien S, Hyland ME, et al. Presentiment or entanglement? An alternative explanation for apparent entanglement in provings. Homeopathy 2005;94:92-95.
10. Schiff M. The Memory of Water: Homeopathy and the Battle of Ideas in the New Science. London: Thorsons (Harper-Collins), 1995.
11. Milgrom LR. Patient-practitioner-remedy (PPR) entanglement: Part 4: Towards classification and unification of the different entanglement models for homeopathy. Homeopathy 2004a;93:34-42.
12. Walach H. Entanglement model of homeopathy as as example of generalised predicted by weak quantum theory. Forsche Komplementärmed Klass Naturheilkd 2003;10:192-200.
13. Walach H. Magic of signs: A non-local interpretation of homeopathy. Br Hom J 2000;89:127-140.
14. Weingärtner O. An approach to the scientific identification of a therapeutically active ingredient of high potencies. Forsche Komplementärmed Klass Naturhelkd 2002;9:229-233.
15. Davenas E, Beauvais F, Aniara J, et al. Human basophil degranulation triggered by very dilute antiserum against IgE. Nature 1988;333:816-818.
16. Belon P, Cumps J, Ennis M, et al. Histamine dilutions modulate basophil activity. Inflamm Res 2004;53:181-183.
17. Möllinger H, Schneider R, Löffel M, et al. A double blind randomized homeopathic pathogenic trial with healthy persons: Comparing two high potencies. Forsche Komplementärmed Klass Naturheilkd 2004;11:274-280.
18. Walach H, Sherr J, Schneider R, et al. Homeopathic proving symptoms: Result of a local, non-local, or placebo process? A blinded, placebo-controlled pilot study. Homeopathy 2004;93:179-185.
19. Weatherley-Jones E, Thompson EA, Thomas KJ, et al. The placebo-controlled trial as a test of complementary and alternative medicine: Observations from research experience of individualised homeopathic treatment. Homeopathy 2004;93:186-189.
20. Milgrom LR. Are randomised controlled trials (RCTs) redundant for testing the efficacy of homeopathy? A critique of RCT methodology from the theoretcal standpoint of patient-practitioner-remedy (PPR) entanglement. J Altern Complement Med 2005a;11:831-838.
21. Gribbon J. Schrodinger's kittens and the search for reality. London: Phoenix, 1995.
22. Gribbon J. Q is for quantum. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson, 1998.
23. Mathie R, Mathie RT. The research evidence base for homeopathy: A fresh assessment of the literature. Homp 2003;92:84-91.
24. Van Wassenhoven M. Priorities and methods for developing the evidence profile of homeopathy: Recommendations of the ECH General Assembly and XVIII Symposium of GIR1. Homp 2005;94:107-124.
25. Cramer JG. Quantum non-locality and the possibility of superluminal effects. Proceedings of the NASA Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Workshop. Cleveland, OH, August 1997.
26. Aspect A, Granger P, Roger R, et al. Experimental realisation of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm gedanken [thought] experiment: A new violation of Bell's inequalities. Phys Rev Lett 1982;49:91-94.
27. Atmanspacher H, Römer H, Walach H. Weak quantum theory: Complementarity and entanglement in physics and beyond. Found Phys 2002;32:379-406.
28. Hyland ME. Does a form of "entanglement" between people explain healing? An examination of hypotheses and methodology. Complement Ther Med 2004;12:198-208.
29. Vallance AK. Can biological activity be maintained at ultra-high dilution? An overview of homeopathy, evidence, and Baycsian philosophy. J Altern Complement Med 1998;4:49-76.
30. Hyland ME. Entanglement and some heretical thoughts about homeopathy. Homeopathy 2004;94:105-106.
31. Milgrom LR. The sound of two hands clapping: Could homeopathy work locally and non-locally? Homeopathy 2005;94:100-104.
32. Schmid GB. Much ado about entanglement: A novel approach to test non-local communication via violation of 'local realism'. Forsche Komplementärmed Klass Naturheilkd 2005;12:214-222.
33. Pain HJ. The Physics of Vibrations and Waves, 5th ed. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Son, 2002.
34. Zeilinger A. Quantum experiments and the foundations of physics. Talk given to the Brookhaven National Laboratory, February 28, 2001.
35. Cramer JG. The transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics. Rev Mod Phys 1986;58:647-687.
36. Greenberger DM, Horne MA, Shimony A, et al. Bell's theorem without inequalities. Am J Phys 1990;58:1131-1143.
37. Milgrom LR. Patient-practitioner-remedy (PPR) entanglement. Part 5. Can homeopathic remedy reactions be outcomes of PPR entanglement? Homeopathy 2004;93:94-98.
38. Wooters WK. Quantum entanglement as a quantifiable resource. Philos Trans R Soc London A 1998;356:1717.
39. Schmidt H, Morris R, Rudolph L. Channeling evidence for a psychokinetic effect on independent observers. J Parapsychol 1986;50:1-15.
40. Zeilinger A. Fundamentals of quantum information. Phys World March. 1998. Online document at: http://physicsweb. org/articles/world/11/3/9
41. Zeilinger A. Quantum teleportation and the nature of reality. 2004. Online document at: http://www.btgjapan.org/catalysts/anton.html
42. Weinberg S. Precision tests of quantum mechanics. Phys Rev Lett 1989;62:485.
43. Polchinski J. Weinberg's non-linear quantum mechanics and the Einstein-Rosen-Podolsky paradox. Phys Rev Lett 1991;66:397.
44. Milgrom LR. Patient-practitioner-remedy (PPR) entanglement. Part 6. Miasms revisited: Non-linear quantum theory as a model for the homeopathic process. Homeopathy 2004;93:154-158.
45. Walach H. Entangled-and tied in knots! Practical consequences of an entanglement model for homeopathic research and practice. Homeopathy 2005;94:96-99.
46. Walach H. Generalised entanglement: A new theoretical model for understanding the effects of complementary and alternative medicine. J Altern Complement Med 2005b;11:549-559.