Towards the measurement of tuple space performance

Performance Evaluation Review

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 51-62

  Fiedler, Daniel ^a   Walcott, Kristen ^a   Richardson, Thomas ^a   Kapfhammer, Gregory M ^a   Amer, Ahmed ^b   Chrysanthis, Panos K ^b  

^a ALLEGHENY COLLEGE   (United States)

^b University of Pittsburgh   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGING METHODS; SERVICE COORDINATION; TUPLE SPACE PERFORMANCE;

AGING OF MATERIALS; BENCHMARKING; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS; THROUGHPUT;

MIDDLEWARE;

EID: 33646399140     PISSN: 01635999     EISSN: 01635999     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1111572.1111574     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. C. C. Arnold, G. M. Kapfhammer, and R. S. Roos. Implementation and analysis of a JavaSpace supported by a relational database. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Processing Techniques and Applications, Las Vegas, Nevada, June 2002.
2. L. Bulej, T. Kalibera, and P. Tuma. Repeated results analysis for middleware regression benchmarking. Performance Evaluation, 60(1-4):345-358, 2005.
3. N. Carriero and D. Gelernter. A computational model of everything. Communications of the ACM, 44(11):77-81, November 2001.
4. E. Cecchet, J. Marguerite, and W. Zwaenepoel. Performance and scalability of EJB applications. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications, pages 246-261, 2002.
5. B. Dufour, K. Driesen, L. Hendren, and C. Verbrugge. Dynamic metrics for Java. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programing, Systems, Languages, and Applications, pages 149-168, 2003.
6. C. J. Fleckenstein and D. Hemmendinger. Using a global name space for parallel execution of UNIX tools. Communications of the ACM, 32(9):1085-1090, 1989.
7. E. Freeman, S. Hupfer, and K. Arnold. JavaSpaces: Principles, Patterns, and Practice. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1999.
8. F. Hancke, G. Stuer, D. Dewolfs, J. Broeckhove, F. Arickx, and T. Dhaene. Modelling overhead in JavaSpaces. In Proceedings of EuroMedia, pages 77-81, 2003.
9. M. Hauswirth, P. F. Sweeney, A. Diwan, and M. Hind. Vertical profiling: understanding the behavior of object-oriented ap plications. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications, pages 251-269, 2004.
10. J. Horgan, J. Power, and J. Waldron. Measurement and analysis of runtime profiling data for Java programs. In IEEE International Workshop on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation, pages 124-132, November, 2001.
11. R. Jain. The Art of Computer Systems Performance Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1991.
12. G. M. Kapfhammer. Automatically and transparently distributing the execution of regression test suites. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Testing Computer Software, Washington, D.C., June 2001.
13. G. M. Kapfhammer. The Computer Science Handbook, chapter 105: Software Testing. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, second edition, 2004.
14. D. J. Lilja. Measuring Computer Performance: A Practicioner's Guide. Cambridge University Press, 2000.
15. H. D. Neve, F. Hancke, T. Dhaene, J. Broeckhove, and F. Arickx. On the use of DOE for the characterization of JavaSpaces. In Proceedings of the European Simulation and Modelling Conference, pages 24-29, 2003.
16. M. S. Noble and S. Zlateva. Scientific computation with JavaSpaces. In Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on High Performance Computing and Networking, June 2001.
17. G. P. Picco, A. L. Murphy, and G.-C. Roman. LIME: Linda meets mobility. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 368-377, 1999.
18. B. Pugh and J. Spacco. RUBiS revisited: why J2EE bench-marking is hard. In Companion to the 19th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications, pages 204-205, 2004.
19. G. Rothermel and M. J. Harrold. A safe, efficient regression test selection technique. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 6(2):173-210, April 1997.
20. M. Rummel, G. M. Kapfhammer, and A. Thall. Towards the prioritization of regression test suites with data flow information. In Proceedings of the 20th Symposium on Applied Computing, Santa Fe, New Mexico, March 2005.
21. K. A. Smith and M. I. Seltzer. File system aging - increasing the relevance of file system benchmarks. In Proceedings of the 1997 ACM SIGMETRICS International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems, pages 203-213, 1997.
22. H. D. Sterck, R. S. Markel, and R. Knight. Parallel Computing in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, chapter TaskSpaces: A Software Framework for Parallel Bioinformatics on Computational Grids. John Wiley and Sons, 2005.
23. H. D. Sterck, R. S. Markel, T. Phol, and U. Rude. A lightweight Java TaskSpaces framework for scientific computing on computational grids. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing, pages 1024-1030, 2003.
24. P. F. Sweeney, M. Hauswirth, B. Cahoon, P. Cheng, A. Diwan, D. Grove, and M. Hind. Using hardware performance monitors to understand the behavior of Java applications. In Proceedings of the 3rd Virtual Machine Research and Technology Symposium, May 2004.
25. P. Wyckoff, S. McLaughry, and T. Lehman. T Spaces. IBM Systems Journal, pages 454 - 474, 1998.
26. X. Zhang and M. Seltzer. HBench:Java: an application-specific benchmarking framework for Java virtual machines. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Java Grande, pages 62-70, 2000.
27. B. Zorman, G. M. Kapfhammer, and R. S. Roos. Creation and analysis of a JavaSpace-based genetic algorithm. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Processing Techniques and Applications, Las Vegas, NV, June 2002.