Temperature regulation of bud-burst phenology within and among years in a young Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) plantation in western Washington, USA

Tree Physiology

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 421-430

  Bailey, John D ^a   Harrington, Constance A ^b  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Bud break; Chilling; Dormancy; Freezing; Heat forcing; Heat sum; Photoperiod

Indexed keywords

ACCUMULATION; BIOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; BUD; BUDBURST; DORMANCY; PHENOLOGY; PLANTATION; SEEDLING; TEMPERATE ENVIRONMENT;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON [UNITED STATES];

PSEUDOTSUGA; PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII;

EID: 33646383076     PISSN: 0829318X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/26.4.421     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Amasino, R. 2004. Vernalization, competence, and the epigenetic memory of winter. Plant Cell 16:2553-2559.
2. Bergervoet, J.H., H. Jing, J.W.E. van den Hout, R. Delmondez de Castro, B. Kunneman, R.J. Bino and S.P.C. Groot. 1999. Expression of beta-tubulin during dormancy induction and release in apical and axillary buds of five woody species. Physiol. Plant. 106:238-245.
3. Campbell, R.K. and A.I. Sugano. 1975. Phenology and bud burst in Douglas-fir related to provenance, photoperiod, chilling and flushing temperature. Bot. Gaz. 136:290-298.
4. Cannell, M.G.R. and R.I. Smith. 1983. Thermal time, chill days and prediction of budburst in Picea sitchensis. J. Appl. Ecol. 20:951-963.
5. Carlson, W.C. and D.E. Miller. 1991. Target seedling root system size, hydraulic conductivity, and water use during seedling establishment. In Target Seedling Symposium: Proceedings, Combined Meeting of the Western Forest Nursery Associations. USDA FS, Gen. Tech. Report RM-200, pp 53-65.
6. Chuine, I., P. Cour and D.D. Rousseau. 1999. Selecting models to predict the timing of flowering of temperate trees: implications for tree phenology modelling. Plant Cell Environ. 22:1-13.
7. Clancy, K.M., Z. Chen and T.E. Kolb. 2004. Foliar nutrients and induced susceptibility: genetic mechanisms of Douglas-fir resistance to western spruce budworm defoliation. Can. J. For. Res. 34:939-949.
8. Cleary, B.D. and R.H. Waring. 1969. Temperature: collection of data and its analysis for the interpretation of plant growth and distribution. Can. J. Bot. 47:167-173.
9. Fløistad, I.S. and K. Kohmann. 2004. Influence of nutrient supply on spring frost hardiness and time of bud break in Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) seedlings. New For. 27:1-11.
10. Fuchigami, L.H., C.J. Weiser, K. Kobayashi, R. Timmis and L.V. Gusta. 1982. A degree growth stage (°GS) model and cold acclimation in temperate woody plants. In Plant Cold Hardiness and Freezing Stress. Eds. P.H. Li and A. Sakai. Academic Press, New York, pp 93-116.
11. Garber, M.P. 1983. Effects of chilling and photoperiod on dormancy release of container-grown loblolly pine seedlings. Can. J. For. Res. 13:1265-1270.
12. 2 and temperature on cold hardiness and spring bud burst and growth in Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii). Tree Physiol. 18:671-679.
13. Hannerz, M. 1999. Evaluation of temperature models for predicting bud burst in Norway spruce. Can. J. For. Res. 29:9-19.
14. Hänninen, H. 1995. Effects of climatic change on trees from cool and temperate regions: an ecophysiological approach to modelling of bud burst phenology. Can. J. Bot. 73:183-199.
15. Hänninen, H. 1996. Effects of climatic warming on northern trees: Testing the frost damage hypothesis with meteorological data from provenance transfer experiments. Scand. J. For. Res. 11:17-25.
16. Hänninen, H. and P. Hari. 2002. Recovery of photosynthesis of boreal conifers during spring: a comparison of two models. For. Ecol. Manage. 169:53-64.
17. Heide, O.M. 1993a. Dormancy release in beech buds (Fagus sylvatica) requires both chilling and long days. Physiol. Plant. 89:187-191.
18. Heide, O.M. 1993b. Daylength and thermal time responses of bud-burst during dormancy release in some northern deciduous trees. Physiol. Plant. 88:531-540.
19. Heide, O.M. 2003. High autumn temperature delays spring bud burst in boreal trees, counterbalancing the effect of climatic warming. Tree Physiol. 23:931-936.
20. Innes, J.L. and D.L. Peterson. 2003. Proceedings introduction: Managing forests in a greenhouse world - context and challenges. In Climate Change, Carbon and Forestry in Northwestern North America. US Forest Service PNW-GTR-614, pp 1-9.
21. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2001. Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group 1 to the third assessment report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 786 p.
22. Kramer, P.J. 1934. Effects of soil temperature on the absorption of water by plants. Science 79:131-132.
23. Langvall, O. and M.O. Löfvenius. 2002. Effect of shelterwood density on nocturnal near-ground temperature, frost injury risk and budburst date of Norway spruce. For. Ecol. Manage. 168:149-161.
24. Lavender, D.P. 1981. Environment and shoot growth of woody plants. Research Paper No. 45, Forest Research Laboratory. Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, 47 p.
25. Lavender, D.P. and S.G. Stafford. 1985. Douglas-fir seedlings: some factors affecting chilling requirement, bud activity, and new foliage production. Can. J. For. Res. 15:309-312.
26. Lavender, D.P., G.B. Sweet, J.B. Zaerr and R.K. Herman. 1973. Spring shoot growth in Douglas-fir may be initiated by gibberellins exported from the roots. Science 182:838-839.
27. Li, P. and W.T. Adams. 1993. Genetic control of bud phenology in pole-size trees and seedlings of coastal Douglas-fir. Can. J. For. Res. 23:1043-1051.
28. Lopushinsky, W. and T.A. Max. 1990. Effect of soil temperature on root and shoot growth and on budburst timing in conifer seedling transplants. New For. 4:107-124.
29. Murray, M.B., M.G.R. Cannell and R.I. Smith. 1989. Date of bud-burst of fifteen tree species in Britain following climatic warming. J. Appl. Ecol. 26:693-700.
30. Myking, T. and O.M. Heide. 1995. Dormancy release and chilling requirement of buds of latitudinal ecotypes of Betula pendula and B. pubescens. Tree Physiol. 15:697-704.
31. Osbourne, C.P., I. Chuine, D. Viner and F.I. Woodward. 2000. Olive phenology as a sensitive indicator of future climatic warming in the Mediterranean. Plant Cell Environ. 23:701-710.
32. Partanen, J., V. Koski and H. Hänninen. 1998. Effects of photoperiod and temperature on the timing of bud burst in Norway spruce (Picea abies). Tree Physiol. 18:811-816.
33. Pop, E.W., S.F. Oberbauer and G. Starr. 2000. Predicting vegetative bud break in two arctic deciduous shrub species, Salix pulchra and Betula nana. Oecologia 124:176-184.
34. Reid, D.M. and W.J. Burrows. 1968. Cytokinen and gibberellin-like activity in the spring sap of trees. Experientia 24:189-190.
35. Richie, G.A. 1984. Effect of freezer storage on bud dormancy release in Douglas-fir seedlings. Can. J. For. Res. 14:186-190.
36. Rinne, P., H. Hänninen, P. Kaikuranta, J.E. Jalonen and T. Repo. 1997. Freezing exposure releases bud dormancy in Betula pubescens and B. pendula. Plant Cell Environ. 20:1199-1204.
37. Roberts, S.D., C.A. Harrington and T.A. Terry. 2005. Harvest residue and competing vegetation affect soil moisture, soil temperature, N availability, and Douglas-fir seedling growth. For. Ecol. Manage. 205:335-350.
38. Sakai, A. and W. Larcher. 1987. Frost survival of plants: responses and adaptation to freezing stress. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 321 p.
39. Spittlehouse, D.L. 2003. Water availability, climate change and the growth of Douglas-fir in the Georgia Basin. Can. Water Res. Bull. 28:673-688.
40. Steinbrenner, E.C. and F.E. Gehrke. 1973. Soil survey of the McDonald Tree Farm. Weyerhaeuser Company, Tacoma, WA, 56 p.
41. Tanja, S., F. Berninger, T. Vesala et al. 2003. Air temperature triggers the recovery of evergreen boreal forest photosynthesis in spring. Global Change Biol. 9:1410-1426.
42. Terry, T.A., R.B. Harrison and C.A. Harrington. 2001. Fall River long-term site productivity study: objectives and design. Weyerhaeuser Company, Centralia, WA. Forestry Research Technical Note - Long-term Site Productivity Paper 01-1, 10 p.
43. Timmis, R., J. Flewelling and C. Talbert. 1994. Frost injury prediction model for Douglas-fir seedlings in the Pacific Northwest. Tree Physiol. 14:855-869.
44. van den Driessche, R. 1975. Flushing response of Douglas-fir buds to chilling and to different air temperatures after chilling. B.C. For. Serv. Res. Note 71, 22 p.
45. van den Driessche, R. 1977. Survival of coastal and interior Douglas-fir seedlings after storage at different temperatures, and effectiveness of cold storage in satisfying chilling requirements. Can. J. For. Res. 7:125-131.
46. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Water and Climate Center; and Oregon State University Spatial Climate Analysis Service. 1999. Parameter-elevation Regressions on Independent Slopes Model (PRISM). Available online from http://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/water/climate/prism/prism.html.
47. Wells, S.P. 1979. Chilling requirements for optimal growth of Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir seedlings. USDA FS, Research Note INT-254, 9 p.
48. White, T.L., K.K. Ching and J. Walters. 1979. Effects of provenance, years, and planting location on bud burst of Douglas-fir. For. Sci. 25:161-167.
49. Wommack, D.E. 1960. Effect of winter chilling and photoperiod on growth resumption in Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco). M.Sc. Thesis. Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, 82 p.
50. Wommack, D.E. 1964. Temperature effects on the growth of Douglas-fir seedlings. Ph.D. Thesis. Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, 176 p.