Growth interactions in communities of common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album), giant foxtail (Setaria faberi), and corn

Weed Science

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 363-370

  Moechnig, Michael J ^a   Boerboom, Chris M ^a   Stoltenberg, David E ^a   Binning, Larry K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Logistic function; Relative leaf area; Relative volume; Weed growth; Weed interactions

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; GROWTH RATE; INTRASPECIFIC COMPETITION; MAIZE; PLANT COMMUNITY; POPULATION DENSITY; WEED;

CHENOPODIUM ALBUM; SETARIA (PLANT); SETARIA FABERI; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 33646373661     PISSN: 00431745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/0043-1745(2003)051[0363:GIICOC]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Aldrich, R. J. 1987. Predicting crop yield reductions from weeds. Weed Technol. 1:199-206.
2. Ballaré, C. L. 1999. Keeping up with the neighbours: phytochrome sensing and other signaling mechanisms. Trends Plant Sci. 4:97-102.
3. Blackshaw, R. E., G. W. Anderson, and J. Dekker. 1987. Interference of Sinapis arvensis L. and Chenopodium album L. in spring rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Weed Res. 27:207-213.
4. Buhler, D. D., M. Liebman, and J. J. Obrycki. 2000. Theoretical and practical challenges to an IPM approach to weed management. Weed Sci. 48:274-280.
5. Bussler, B. H., B. D. Maxwell, and K. Puettmann. 1995. Using plant volume to quantify interference in corn (Zea mays) neighborhoods. Weed Sci. 43:586-594.
6. Caton, B. P., T. C. Foin, and J. E. Hill. 1999. A plant growth model for integrated weed management in direct-seeded rice. III. Interspecific competition for light. Field Crops Res. 63:47-61.
7. Colquhoun, J., D. E. Stoltenberg, L. K. Binning, and C. M. Boerboom. 2001. Phenology of Chenopodium album growth parameters. Weed Sci. 49:177-183.
8. Conley, S. P., L. K. Binning, C. M. Boerboom, and D. E. Stoltenberg. 2002. Estimating giant foxtail cohort productivity in soybean based on weed density, leaf area, or volume. Weed Sci. 50:72-78.
9. Connolly, J. 1997. Substitutive experiments and the evidence for competitive hierarchies in plant communities. Oikos 80:179-182.
10. Connolly, J. and P. Wayne. 1996. Asymmetric competition between plant species. Oecologia 108:311-320.
11. Cousens, R. D. 1992. Weed competition and interference in cropping systems. Pages 113-117 in Proceedings of the First International Weed Control Congress. Melbourne, Australia: Weed Science Society of Victoria.
12. Cowan, P., S. E. Weaver, and C. J. Swanton. 1998. Interference between pigweed (Amaranthus spp.), barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli), and soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 46:533-539.
13. Draper, N. R. and H. Smith. 1998. Applied Regression Analysis. 3rd ed. New York: J. Wiley. pp. 33-76.
14. Ervio, L. 1971. The effect of intra-specific competition on the development of Chenopodium album L. Weed Res. 11:124-134.
15. Fausey, J. C., J. J. Kells, S. M. Swinton, and K. A. Renner. 1997. Giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) interference in nonirrigated corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 45:256-260.
16. France, J. and J.H.T. Thornley. 1984. Mathematical Models in Agriculture. London: Butterworths. pp. 80-82.
17. Freckleton, R. P. and A. R. Watkinson. 1998. Predicting the determinants of weed abundance: a model for the population dynamics of Chenopodium album in sugar beet. J. Appl. Ecol. 35:904-920.
18. Ghersa, C. M. and J. S. Holt. 1995. Using phenology prediction in weed management: a review. Weed Res. 35:461-470.
19. Gibson, D. J., J. Connolly, D. C. Hartnett, and J. D. Weidenhamer. 1999. Designs for greenhouse studies of interactions between plants. J. Ecol. 87:1-16.
20. Graf, B., A. P. Gutierrez, O. Rakotobe, P. Zahner, and V. Delucchi. 1990. A simulation model for the dynamics of rice growth and development: part II-the competition with weeds for nitrogen and light. Agric. Syst. 32:367-392.
21. Harrison, S. K., E. E. Regnier, J. T. Schmoll, and J. E. Webb. 2001. Competition and fecundity of giant ragweed in corn. Weed Sci. 49:224-229.
22. Hartzler, R. G., D. D. Buhler, and D. E. Stoltenberg. 1999. Emergence characteristics of four annual weed species. Weed Sci. 47:578-584.
23. Jasieniuk, M., B. D. Maxwell, R. L. Anderson, et al. 1999. Site-to-site and year-to-year variation in Triticum aestivum-Aegilops cylindrical interference relationships. Weed Sci. 47:529-537.
24. Knake, E. L. and F. W. Slife. 1965. Giant foxtail seeded at various times in corn and soybeans. Weeds 13:331-334.
25. Knezevic, S. Z. and M. J. Horak. 1998. Influence of emergence time and density on redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus). Weed Sci. 46:665-672.
26. Knezevic, S. Z., S. F. Weise, and C. J. Swanton. 1994. Threshold of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) in corn (Zea mays L.). Weed Sci. 42:568-573.
27. Knezevic, S. Z., S. F. Weise, and C. J. Swanton. 1995. Comparison of empirical models depicting density of Amaranthus retroflexus L. and relative leaf area as predictors of yield loss in maize (Zea mays L.). Weed Res. 35:207-214.
28. Kropff, M. J. 1993. Mechanisms of competition for light. Pages 33-60 in M. J. Kropff and H. H. van Laar, eds. Modelling Crop-Weed Interactions. Wallingford, Great Britain: CAB International.
29. Kropff, M. J. and L.A.P. Lotz. 1993. Eco-physiological characterization of the species. Pages 83-104 in M. J. Kropff and H. H. van Laar, eds. Modelling Crop-Weed Interactions. Wallingford, Great Britain: CAB International.
30. Law, R. and A. R. Watkinson. 1987. Response-surface analysis of two-species competition: an experiment on Phleum arenarium and Vulpia fasciculata. J. Ecol. 75:871-886.
31. Légère, A. and M. M. Schreiber. 1989. Competition and canopy architecture as affected by soybean (Glycine max) row width and density of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus). Weed Sci. 37:84-92.
32. Lindquist, J. L., D. A. Mortensen, P. Westra, et al. 1999. Stability of corn (Zea mays)-foxtail (Setaria spp.) interference relationships. Weed Sci. 47:195-200.
33. Lins, R. D. and C. M. Boerboom. 2000. Relationship of seed production to biomass for four weed species. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 55:42-43.
34. Lotz, L.A.P., S. Christensen, D. Cloutier, et al. 1996. Prediction of the competitive effects of weeds on crop yields based on the relative leaf area of weeds. Weed Res. 36:93-101.
35. Lutman, P. J., R. Risiott, and H. P. Ostermann. 1996. Investigations into alternative methods to predict the competitive effects of weeds on crop yields. Weed Sci. 44:290-297.
36. Mashingaidze, A. B. 1990. Comparison of Leaf Area Expansion Rates in Four Crops and Seven Weeds under Two Temperature Regimes. M.S. thesis. Iowa Sate University, Ames, IA. pp. 32-34.
37. Massinga, R. A., R. S. Currie, M. J. Horak, and J. Boyer, Jr. 2001. Interference of Palmer amaranth in corn. Weed Sci. 49:202-208.
38. Morgan, D. C. and H. Smith. 1981. Non-photosynthetic responses to light quality. Pages 109-134 in D. L. Lange, P. S. Nobel, C. B. Osmond, and H. Ziegler, eds. Physiological Plant Ecology I; Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology. Volume 12A. New York: Springer Verlag.
39. Mulugeta, D. and D. E. Stoltenberg. 1998. Influence of cohorts on Chenopodium album demography. Weed Sci. 46:65-70.
40. Orwick, P. L. and M. M. Schreiber. 1979. Interference of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) and robust foxtail (Setaria viridis var. robusta-alba or var. robusta-purpurea) in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 27:665-674.
41. Pantone, D. J. and J. B. Baker. 1991. Weed-crop competition models and response-surface analysis of red rice competition in cultivated rice: a review. Crop Sci. 31:1105-1110.
42. Radosevich, S., J. Holt, and C. Ghersa. 1997. Weed Ecology: Implications for Management. New York: J. Wiley. pp. 163-216.
43. Seibert, A. C. and R. B. Pearce. 1993. Growth analysis of weed and crop species with reference to seed weight. Weed Sci. 41:52-56.
44. Street, J. E., C. E. Snipes, J. A. McGuire, and G. A. Buchanan. 1985. Competition of a binary weed system with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 33:807-809.
45. Swinton, S. M., D. D. Buhler, F. Forcella, J. F. Gunsolus, and R. P. King. 1994. Estimation of crop yield loss due to interference by multiple weed species. Weed Sci. 42:103-109.
46. Tharp, B. E. and J. J. Kells. 2001. Effect of glufosinate-resistant corn (Zea mays) population and row spacing on light interception, corn yield, and common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) growth. Weed Technol. 15:413-418.
47. Tremmel, D. C. and F. A. Bazzaz. 1993. How neighbor canopy architecture affects target plant performance. Ecology 74:2114-2124.
48. Van Acker, R. C., P. J. Lutman, and R. J. Froud-Williams. 1997. Predicting yield loss due to interference from two weed species using early observations of relative weed leaf area. Weed Res. 37:287-299.
49. Wiederholt, R. J. and D. E. Stoltenberg. 1996. Absence of differential fitness between giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) accessions resistant and susceptible to acetyl-coenzyme a carboxylase inhibitors. Weed Sci. 44:18-24.