SIGAPS a prototype of bibliographic tool for medical research evaluation

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 95, Issue , 2003, Pages 721-726

  Devos, P ^a   Dufresne, E ^a   Renard, J M ^a   Beuscart, R ^a  

^a LILLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

bibliographic indicators; reports; research evaluation

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOGRAPHIES; SEARCH ENGINES;

AUTOMATIC PRODUCTION; COMPLEX ANALYSIS; REPORTS; RESEARCH ACTIVITIES; RESEARCH EVALUATION; SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS; STANDARDIZED METHODS; SUMMARY STATISTIC;

SOFTWARE PROTOTYPING;

EID: 33646348897     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-939-4-721     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. E.C.M Noyons, M. Luwel, H.F Moed, Assessment of Flemish R&Din the field of information technology. A bibliometric evaluation based on publication and patent data, combined with OECD research input statistics, Research Policy, 27 (1998) 285-300.
2. W. Glänzel, U. Schoeplin, A bibliometric study of reference literature in the sciences and social sciences, Information Processing and Management, 35 (1999) 31-44.
3. ISI Homepage-http://www.isinet.com.
4. Entrez Pubmed-http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Pubmed/
5. RE Gagnon, AJ Macnab, FA Gagnon, A quantitative ranking of Canada's research output of original human studies for the decade 1989 to 1998, Canadian Medical Association Journal, 162 (2000) 37-40.
6. K. Dickersin et al, Problems with indexing and citation of articles with group authorship, Journal of the American Medical Association, 287(2002) 2772-2774.
7. E. Garfield, Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation, Science, 178(1972) 471-479.
8. The OpenLDAP Project-http://www.openldap.org
9. The World's Most Popular Open Source Database-http://www.mysgl.org
10. P.O Seglen, Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research, British Medical Journal, 314(1997) 498-502.