Change in intraocular pressure within 1 week of phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation using Adatocel

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 573-576

  Biro, Zsolt ^a   Balogh, Teodora ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PÉCS   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYDROXYPROPYLMETHYLCELLULOSE;

ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ANTERIOR EYE CHAMBER; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE REMOVAL; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LENS IMPLANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; POSTERIOR EYE CHAMBER; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STUDENT T TEST; TONOMETRY; TOPICAL ANESTHESIA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANESTHESIA, LOCAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LENS IMPLANTATION, INTRAOCULAR; MALE; METHYLCELLULOSE; MIDDLE AGED; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; OPHTHALMIC SOLUTIONS; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 33646337433     PISSN: 08863350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.12.105     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Allan B.D.S., Baer R.M., Heyworth P., et al. Conventional routine clinical review may not be necessary after uncomplicated phacoemulsification. Br J Ophthalmol 81 (1997) 548-550
2. Arshinoff S.A., Albiani D.A., and Taylor-Laporte J. Intraocular pressure after bilateral cataract surgery using Healon, Healon5 and Healon GV. J Cataract Refract Surg 28 (2002) 617-625
3. McKellar M.J., and Elder M.J. The early complications of cataract surgery; is routine review of patients 1 week after cataract extraction necessary?. Ophthalmology 108 (2001) 930-935
4. Böhmer T.G., Lagrèze W.-D.A., and Funk J. Intraocular pressure rise after phacoemulsification with posterior chamber lens implantation: effect of prophylactic medication, wound closure, and surgeon's experience. Br J Ophthalmol 79 (1995) 809-813
5. Holzer M.P., Tetz M.R., Auffarth G.U., et al. Effect of Healon5 and 4 other viscoelastic substances on intraocular pressure and endothelium after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 27 (2001) 213-218
6. Thirumalai B., and Baranyovits P.R. Intraocular pressure changes and the implications on patient review after phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 29 (2003) 504-507
7. Tranos P.G., Wickremasinghe S.S., Hildebrand D., et al. Same-day versus first-day review of intraocular pressure after uneventful phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 29 (2003) 508-512
8. Tetz M.R., Holzer M.P., Lundberg K., et al. Clinical results of phacoemulsification with the use of Healon5 or Viscoat. J Cataract Refract Surg 27 (2001) 416-420
9. Vasavada A.R., Mamidipudi P.R., and Minj M. Relationship of immediate intraocular pressure rise to phaco-tip ergonomics and energy dissipation. J Cataract Refract Surg 30 (2004) 137-143
10. Henry J.C., and Olander K. Comparison of the effect of four viscoelastic agents on early postoperative intraocular pressure. J Cataract Refract Surg 22 (1996) 960-966
11. Jürgens I., Matheu A., and Castilla M. Ocular hypertension after cataract surgery: a comparison of three surgical techniques and two viscoelastics. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 28 (1997) 30-36
12. Kohnen T., von Ehr M., Schütt E., and Koch D.D. Evaluation of intraocular pressure with Healon and Healon GV in sutureless cataract surgery with foldable lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 22 (1996) 227-237
13. Mastropasqua L., Carpineto P., Ciancaglini M., and Falconio G. Intraocular pressure changes after phacoemulsification and foldable silicon lens implantation using Healon GV®. Ophthalmologica 212 (1998) 318-321
14. Rainer G., Menapace R., Findl O., et al. Intraocular pressure after small incision cataract surgery with Healon5 and Viscoat. J Cataract Refract Surg 26 (2000) 271-272
15. Berson F.G., Patterson M.M., and Epstein D.L. Obstruction of aqueous outflow by sodium hyaluronate in enucleated human eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 95 (1983) 668-672
16. Arshinoff S. The physical properties of ophthalmic viscoelastics in cataract surgery. Ophthalmic Pract 9 (1991) 81-86
17. Arshinoff S.A., and Wong E. Understanding, retaining and removing dispersive and pseudodispersive ophthalmic viscosurgical devices. J Cataract Refract Surg 29 (2003) 2318-2323
18. th Annual National Ophthalmic Speakers Program, Ottawa, June 1997. Quebec Medicöpea 1977; 29-30
19. Arshinoff S.A. Dispersive-cohesive viscoelastic soft shell technique. J Cataract Refract Surg 25 (1999) 167-173
20. Auffarth G.U., Holzer M.P., Visessook N., et al. Removal times and techniques of a viscoadaptive ophthalmic viscosurgical device. J Cataract Refract Surg 30 (2004) 879-883
21. Tetz M.R., and Holzer M.P. Two-compartment technique to remove ophthalmic viscosurgical devices. J Cataract Refract Surg 26 (2000) 641-643
22. Zetterström C., Wejde G., and Traube M. Healon5: comparison of 2 removal techniques. J Cataract Refract Surg 28 (2002) 1561-1564
23. Kasetti S.R., Desai S.P., Sivakumar S., Sunderraj P., et al. Preventing intraocular pressure increase after phacoemulsification and the role of perioperative apraclonidine. J Cataract Refract Surg 28 (2002) 2177-2180
24. Zohdy G.A., Rogers Z.A., Lukaris A., et al. A comparison of the effectiveness of dorzolamide and acetazolaide in preventing post-operative intraocular pressure rise following phacoemulsification surgery. [reply to letter]. J R Coll Surg Edin 43 (1998) 344-346