Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the pelvis in the diagnosis of cervical carcinoma - Review;Magnetresonanztomographie (MRT) des beckens in der diagnostik des zervixkarzinoms - Eine übersichtsarbeit

Zentralblatt fur Gynakologie

Volumn 128, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 60-67

  Hauth, Elke A M ^a   Kimmig, R ^a   Forsting, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cervical carcinoma; MRI of the pelvis

Indexed keywords

CANCER STAGING; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; IMAGING SYSTEM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RADIODIAGNOSIS; REVIEW; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

CERVIX UTERI; FEMALE; HUMANS; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM STAGING; PELVIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 33646251371     PISSN: 00444197     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-921336     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Landis SH, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 1998; 48: 6-29
2. 2-weighted pulse imaging. Eur Radiol 1998; 8: 1433-1440
3. Hamm B, Kubik-Huch RA, Fleige B. MR imaging and CT of the female pelvis: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Eur Radiol 1999; 9: 3-15
4. Arbeitsgemeinschaft der wissenschaftlichen medizinischen Fachgesellschaften. Interdisziplinäre Leitlinie der Deutschen Krebsgesellschaft e.V. (DKG) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe (DGGG): Diagnostik und Therapie des Zervixkarzinoms. AWMF-Leinilinienregister Nr. 032/033, März 2003, Entwicklungsstufe 2: 1-31
5. Michniewicz K., Oellinger J. Bildgebende Diagnostik beim invasiven Zervixkarzinom: MRT, CT und Ultraschall. Zentralbl Gynakol 2001; 123: 222-228
6. Kubik-Huch RA. Female pelvis. Review article. European Radiology 1999; 9: 1715-1721
7. Forstner R, Graf A. Bildgebende Diagnostik im Staging gynäkologischer Karzinome. Radiologe 1999; 39: 610-618
8. Boss EA, Barnetsz JO, Massuger LFAG, Boonstra H. The role of MR imaging in invasive cercival carcinoma. Eur Radiol 2000; 10: 256-370
9. 1-gewichteten SeSequenzen bei 1,5 Tesla. Fortschr Röntgenstr 1997; 166: 312-316
10. Higgins CB, Hricak H, Helms CA. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the body. Third Edition. Lippincott-Raven Press, New York 1997; Chapter 31; 816-844
11. Hamm B, Krestin GP, Laniado M, Nicolas V. MRT von Abdomen und Becken. Kapitel 11: Uterus und Vagina. Stuttgart, Thieme 1999; 221-263
12. n Togashi K, Morikawa K, Kataoka M, Konishi J. Cervical cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 8: 391-397
13. Hauth EA, Stattaus J, Debatin JF, Ruehm SG. Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of benign and malignant pelvic tumors. Rofo 2004; 176: 817-828
14. Ozsarlak O, Tjalma W, Schepens E, Corthouts B, Op de Beeck B, Van Marck E, Parizel PM, De Schepper AM. The correlation of preoperative CT, MR imaging, and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings in primary cervical carcinoma. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 2338-2345
15. Choi SH, Kim SH, Choi HJ, Park BK, Lee HJ. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: results of prospective study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004; 28: 620-627
16. Nicolet V, Carignan L, Bourdon F, Prosmanne O. MR imaging of cervical carcinoma: a practical staging approach. Radiographics 2000; 20: 1539-1549
17. 1-weighted images with histopathological correlation. Abdom Imaging 1997; 22: 103-107
18. Seki H, Azumi R, Kimura M, Sakai K. Stromal invasion by carcinoma of the cervix: assessment with dynamic MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168: 1579-1585
19. Vierzen PBJvon, Massuger LFAG, Ruys SHJ, Barentsz JO. Fast dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging of cervical carcinoma. Clin Radiol 1998; 53: 183-192
20. Scheidler J, Heuck AF. Imaging of cancer of the cervix. Radiol Clin N Am 2002; 40: 577-590
21. Hricak H, Lacey CG, Sandles LG, Chan YC, Winkler ML, Stern JL. Invasive cervical carcinoma: comparison of MRI and surgical findings. Radiology 1988; 166: 623-631
22. Kim SH, Choi BI, Han JK, Kim HD, Lee HP, Kang SB. Preoperative staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MRI in 99 patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993; 17: 633-640
23. Kim SH, Choi BI, Lee HP, Kang SB, Choi YM, Han MC et al. Uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MR findings. Radiology 1990; 175: 45-51
24. Reinhold C, Gallix BP, Ascher SM. Uterus and cervix. In: Semelka RC, Ascher SM, Reinhold C (eds). MRI of the abdomen and pelvis: a text atlas. Willey-Liss, New York, NY 1997; 585-660
25. McCarthy S, Hricak H. The uterus and vagina. In: Higgins CB, Hricak H, Helms CA (eds). Magnetic resonance imaging of the body. 3rd ed. Lippincott-Raven, New York, NY 1997; 761-814
26. Kim SH, Han MC. Invasion of the urinary bladder by uterine cervical carcinoma: evaluation with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168: 393-397
27. Scheidler J, Heuck AF, Steinborn M et al. Parametrial invasion in cervical carcinoma. Evaluation of detection at MR imaging with fat suppression. Radiology 1998; 206: 125-129
28. Williams AD, Cousins C, Soutter WP et al. Detection of pelvic lymph node metastases in gynaecologic malignancy. Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177: 343-348
29. Kim SH, Kim SC, Choi BI, Han MC. Uterine cervical carcinoma: evaluation of pelvic lymph node metastasis with MRI. Radiology 1994; 190: 807-811
30. McCauley TR, Rifkin MD, Ledet CA. Pelvic lymph node visualization with MR imaging using local administration of ultra-small superparamagnetic iron oxide contrast. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 4: 492-497
31. Yamashita Y, Baba T, Baba Y, Nishimura R, Ikeda S et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of uterine cervical cancer: Pharmakokinetic analysis with histopathgologic correlation and its importance in predicting the outcome of radiation therapy. Radiology 2000; 215: 803-809
32. Sugimura K, Okizuka H. Postsurgical pelvis: treatment follow-up. Radiol Clin N Am 2002; 40: 659-680
33. Jeong YY, Kang HK, Chung TW, Seo JJ, Park JG. Uterine cervical carcinoma after therapy: CT and MR imaging findings. RadioGraphics 2003; 23: 969-981
34. Thompson JD. Hysterectomie. In: Thompson JD, Rock JA (eds). The Lind's operative gynecology. JB Lippincott, Philadelphia, PA 1992; 663-738
35. Fulcher AS, O'Sullivan SG, Segreti EM, Kavanagh BD. Recurrent cervical carcinoma: typical and atypical manifestations. Radiographics 1999; 19: 103-116
36. Larson DM, Copeland IJ, Stringer CA, Gershenson DM, Malone JM, Edwards CL Recurrent cervical carcinoma after radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Incol 1988; 30: 381-387
37. Kinkel K, Ariche M, Tardivon AA et al. Differentiation between recurrent tumor and benign conditions after treatment of gynecologic pelvic carcinoma: value of dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging. Radiology 1997; 204: 55-63
38. Yamashita Y, Harada M, Torashima M et al. Dynamic MR imaging of recurrent postoperative cervical cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 6: 167-171
39. Unterweger M, Kubik-Huch RA. Weibliches Becken. In: Rummeny EJ, Reimer R, Heidel W. Gankörper-MR-Tomographie. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, New-York 2002; 402-427
40. Kawanagh BD, Gieschen HI, Schmidt-Ullrich RK et al. A pilot study of concomitant boost accelerated superfractionated radiotherapy for stage III cancer of the uterine cervix. In J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997; 38: 561-568
41. Beckmann MW, Mehlhorn G, Thiel F, Breuel C, Fasching PA, Ackermann S. Therapiefortschritte beim primären Zervixkarzinom. Dt Ärztebl 2005; 102: 979-986
42. Yang WT, Man Lam WW, Yu MY et al. Comparison of dynamic helical CT and dynamic MR imaging in the evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175: 759-766
43. Wittekind C, Meyer HJK, Bootz F. TNM 6. Auflage UICC. TNM-Klassifikation maligner Tumoren. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 2002
44. Schneider A, Hertel H. Surgical and radiographic staging in patients with cervical cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2004; 16:11-18
45. Oellinger JJ, Blohmer JU, Michniewicz K, Siewert C, Wust P, Gutberlet M, Lichtenegger W, Felix R. Pre-operative staging of cervical cancer: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) with histologic results. Zentralbl Gynakol. 2000; 122: 82-91
46. De Souza NM, Whittle M, Williams AD, Sohail M, Krausz T, Gilderale DJ et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the primary site in stage I cervical carcinoma: A comparison of endovaginal coil with external phased array coil techniques at 0.5 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 12: 1020-1026