Assessing the scaffold diversity of screening libraries

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 512-524

  Krier, Mireille ^a,b,c   Bret, Guillaume ^a,b   Rognan, Didier ^a,b  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b Bâtiment CEI   (France)

^c MERCK KGAA   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS; COMBINATORIAL MATHEMATICS; DATA ACQUISITION; DRUG PRODUCTS; MEDICINE; SCAFFOLDS; SCREENING;

COMBINATORIAL LIBRARIES; COMPOUND ACQUISITION; SCAFFOLD DIVERSITY; SCREENING LIBRARIES;

DIGITAL LIBRARIES;

DOPAMINE RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY; FACTUAL DATABASE; METHODOLOGY; STATISTICS;

CHEMISTRY, PHARMACEUTICAL; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY TECHNIQUES; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DOPAMINE ANTAGONISTS; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE;

EID: 33646242741     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci050352v     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (48)

1. National Chemical Library, National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS). http://chimiotheque.ujf-grenoble.fr/induk.html (December 2005).
2. Austin, C. P.; Brady, L. S.; Insel, T. R.; Collins, F. S. NIH Molecular Libraries Initiative. Science 2004, 306, 1138-1139.
3. Webb, T. R. Current directions in the evolution of compound libraries. Curr. Opin. Drug Discovery Dev. 2005, 8, 303-308.
4. Bocker, A.; Derksen, S.; Schmidt, E.; Teckentrup, A.; Schneider, G. A hierarchical clustering approach for large compound libraries. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2005, 45, 807-815.
5. Martin, Y. C. Diverse viewpoints on computational aspects of molecular diversity. J. Comb. Chem. 2001, 3, 231-250.
6. Baurin, N.; Baker, R.; Richardson, C.; Chen, I.; Foloppe, N.; Potter. A.; Jordan, A.; Roughley, S.; Parratt, M.; Greaney, P.; Morley, D.; Hubbard, R. E. Drug-like annotation and duplicate analysis of a 23-supplier chemical database totalling 2.7 million compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 643-651.
7. Cummins, D. J.; Andrews, C. W.; Bentley, J. A.; Cory, M. Molecular diversity in chemical databases: comparison of medicinal chemistry knowledge bases and databases of commercially available compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 750-763.
8. Shemetulskis, N. E.; Dunbar, J. B., Jr.; Dunbar, B. W.; Moreland, D. W.; Humblet, C. Enhancing the diversity of a corporate database using chemical database clustering and analysis. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1995, 9, 407-416.
9. Sirois, S.; Hatzakis, G.; Wei, D.; Du, Q.; Chou, K. C. Assessment of chemical libraries for their druggability. Comput. Biol. Chem. 2005, 29, 55-67.
10. McGregor, M. J.; Pallai, P. V. Clustering of large databases of compounds: Using the MDL "keys" as structural descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 443-448.
11. Voigt, J. H.; Bienfait, B.; Wang, S.; Nicklaus, M. C. Comparison of the NCI open database with seven large chemical structural databases. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 702-712.
12. Nilakantan, R.; Bauman, N.; Haraki, K. S. Database diversity assessment: new ideas, concepts, and tools. J. Comput.-Aided Mol Des. 1997, 11, 447-452.
13. McFayden, I.; Walker, G.; Alvarez, J. Enhancing hit quality and diversity within assay throughput constraints. In Chemoinformatics in Drug Discovery; Oprea, T., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2004; pp 143-173.
14. McGregor, J. J.; Willett, P. Use of a maximum common subgraph algorithm in the automatic identification of ostensible bond changes occurring in chemical reactions. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1981, 21, 137-140.
15. Su, A. I.; Lorber, D. M.; Weston, G. S.; Baase, W. A.; Matthews, B. W.; Shoichet, B. K. Docking molecules by families to increase the diversity of hits in database screens: computational strategy and experimental evaluation. Proteins 2001, 42, 279-293.
16. Bemis, G. W.; Murcko, M. A. The properties of known drugs. 1. Molecular frameworks. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 2887-2893.
17. Nilakantan, R.; Bauman, N.; Dixon, J. S.; Venkataraghavan, R. Topological torsions: A new molecular descriptor for SAR applications. Comparison with other descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1987, 27, 82-85.
18. Lewell, X. Q.; Judd, D. B.; Watson, S. P.; Hann, M. M. RECAP-retrosynthetic combinatorial analysis procedure: a powerful new technique for identifying privileged molecular fragments with useful applications in combinatorial chemistry. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 511-522.
19. ClassPharmer Suite, version 3.2-3.5; Bioreason, Inc.: Santa Fe, NM.
20. Charifson, P. S.; Walters, W. P. Filtering databases and chemical libraries. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2002, 16, 311-323.
21. Filter 1.0; OpenEye Scientific Software, Inc.: Santa Fe, NM.
22. Cliff. 1.23; Molecular Networks GmbH, D-91052 Erlangen, Germany.
23. Roberts, G.; Myatt, G. J.; Johnson, W. P.; Cross, K. P.; Blower, P. E., Jr. LeadScope: Software for Exploring Large Sets of Screening Data. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 1302-1314.
24. OEChem, version 1.3; OpenEye Scientific Software, Inc.: Santa Fe, NM.
25. Weininger, D. SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1988, 28, 31-36.
26. Willett, P. An algorithm for chemical superstructure searching. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1985, 25, 114-116.
27. Brown, R. D.; Downs, G. M.; Willett, P.; Cook, A. P. F. A hyperstructure model for chemical structure handling: Generation and atom-by-atom searching of hyperstructures. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1992, 32, 522-531.
28. InChI (IUPAC International Chemical Identifier), version 1.0: IU-PAC: Research Triangle Park, NC, 2005.
29. JChemBase; ChemAxon Ltd.: Budapest, Hungary.
30. Hert, J.; Willett, P.; Wilton, D. J.; Acklin, P.; Azzaoui, K.; Jacoby, E.; Schuffenhauer, A. Comparison of fingerprint-based methods for virtual screening using multiple bioactive reference structures. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 1177-1185.
31. Nilakantan, R.; Nunn, D. S. A fresh look at pharmaceutical screening library design. Drug Discovery Today 2003, 8, 668-672.
32. Xue, L.; Bajorath, J. Distribution of molecular scaffolds and R-groups isolated from large compound databases. J. Mol. Model. 1999, 5, 97 - 102.
33. Feher, M.; Schmidt, J. M. Property distributions: differences between drugs, natural products, and molecules from combinatorial chemistry. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 218-227.
34. Selzer, P.; Roth, H. J.; Ertl, P.; Schuffenhauer, A. Complex molecules: do they add value? Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2005, 9, 310-316.
35. Baurin, N.; Aboul-Ela, F.; Barril, X.; Davis, B.; Drysdale, M.; Dymock, B.; Finch, H.; Fromont, C.; Richardson, C.; Simmonite, H.: Hubbard, R. E. Design and characterization of libraries of molecular fragments for use in NMR screening against protein targets. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 2157-2166.
36. Schuffenhauer, A.; Ruedisser, S.; Marzinzik, A. L.; Jahnke, W.; Blommers, M.; Selzer, P.; Jacoby, E. Library design for fragment based screening. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2005, 5, 751-762.
37. Zartler, E. R.; Shapiro, M. J. Fragonomics: fragment-based drug discovery. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2005, 9, 366-370.
38. Agrafiotis, D. K.; Lobanov, V. S.; Salemme, F. R. Combinatorial informatics in the post-genomics era. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2002, 1, 337-346.
39. Card, G. L.; Blasdel, L.; England, B. P.; Zhang, C.; Suzuki, Y.; Gillette, S.; Fong, D.: Ibrahim, P. N.; Artis, D. R.; Bollag, G.; Milburn, M. V.; Kim, S. H.; Schlessinger, J.; Zhang, K. Y. A family of phosphodiesterase inhibitors discovered by cocrystallography and scaffold-based drug design. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 201-207.
40. Watson, P.; Willett, P.; Gillet, V. J.; Verdonk, M. L. Calculating the knowledge-based similarity of functional groups using crystallographic data. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2001, 15, 835-857.
41. Sauer, W. H.; Schwarz, M. K. Molecular shape diversity of combinatorial libraries: a prerequisite for broad bioactivity. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 987-1003.
42. De Laet, A.; Hehenkamp, J. J. J.; Wife, R. L. Finding drug candidates in virtual and lost/emerging chemistry. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2000, 669-674.
43. Cases, M.; Garcia-Serna, R.; Hettne, K.; Weeber, M.; van der Lei, J.; Boyer, S.: Mestres, J. Chemical and biological profiling of an annotated compound library directed to the nuclear receptor family. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2005, 5, 763-772.
44. Wilkens, S. J.; Janes, J.; Su, A. I. HierS: Hierarchical scaffold clustering using topological chemical graphs. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 3182-3193.
45. Xu, Y. J.; Johnson, M. Using molecular equivalence numbers to visually explore structural features that distinguish chemical libraries. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 912-926.
46. Stahl, M.; Mauser, H. Database clustering with a combination of fingerprint and maximum common substructure methods. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2005, 45, 542-548.
47. Krier, M.; Araujo-Junior, J. X.; Schmitt, M.; Duranton, J.; Justiano-Basaran, H.; Lugnier, C.; Bourguignon, J. J.; Rognan, D. Design of small-sized libraries by combinatorial assembly of linkers and functional groups to a given scaffold: application to the structure-based optimization of a phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 3816-3822.
48. Pipeline Pilot, version 4.2; SciTegic Inc.: San Diego, CA.