Assessing the reproducibility of an analytical method

Journal of Chromatographic Science

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 119-122

  Liao, Jason J Z ^a   Capen, Robert C ^a   Schofield, Timothy L ^a  

^a MERCK RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 33646191226     PISSN: 00219665     EISSN: 00219665     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/chromsci/44.3.119     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry: Bioanalytical Method Validation. FDA, Washington, D.C., 2001.
2. J.M. Bland and D.G. Altman. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 2: 307-10 (1986).
3. R.A. Deyo, P. Diehr, and D.L. Patrick. Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures: statistics and strategies for evaluation. Controlled Clin. Trials 12: 142S-58S (1991).
4. J.J.Z. Liao. An improved concordance correlation coeffcient. Pharm. Statistics 2(4): 253-61 (2003).
5. L.I.-K. Lin. A concordance correlation coeffcient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 45: 255-68 (1989).
6. J. Ludbrook. Comparing methods of measurement. Clin. Exp. Pharm. Physiol. 24: 193-203 (1997).
7. D.C. Montgomery. Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1996.