Soft tissue evaluation of contemporary Caucasian and African American female facial profiles

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 68, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 487-496

  Sutter, Robert E ^a   Turley, Patrick K ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

African American; Beauty; Caucasian; Facial profile; Soft tissue

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CAUCASIAN; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ESTHETICS; FACE; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; LIP; MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; NEGRO; REFERENCE VALUE; UNITED STATES;

AFRICAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; BEAUTY; CEPHALOMETRY; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIP; MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; REFERENCE VALUES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032254218     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Peck H, Peck S. A concept of facial esthetics. Angle Orthod 1970;40:285-318.
2. Auger TA, Turley PK. Changes in the esthetic soft tissue profile as presented by the mass media during the 1900s: A photographic analysis. J Dent Res Special Issue, Abstracts of Papers. 1996;75:336 #2549.
3. Martin JG. Racial ethnocentrism and judgment of beauty. J Soc Psych 1964;63:59-63.
4. Thomas RG. An evaluation of the soft tissue facial profile in the North American black woman. Am J Orthod 1979;76:84-94.
5. Farrow AL, Zarrinnia K, Azizi K. Bimaxillary protrusion in black Americans - an esthetic evaluation and the treatment considerations. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1993;104:240-50.
6. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. London: George and Allen Unwin, 1940.
7. Altemus LA. Comparative integumental relationships. Angle Orthod 1963;33:217-21.
8. Drummond RA. A determination of cephalometric norms for the Negro race. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1968;54:670-82.
9. Altemus LA. A comparison of cephalofacial relationships. Angle Orthod 1960;30:223-40.18.
10. Bacon W, Girardin P, Turlot JC. A comparison of cephalometric norms for the African Bantu and a Caucasoid population. Eur J Orthod 1983;5:233-40.
11. Jacobson A. The craniofacial skeletal pattern of the South African Negro. Am J Orthod 1978;73:6:681-91.
12. Sushner M. A photographic study of the soft tissue profile of the Negro population. Am J Orthod 1977;72:373-85.
13. Casko JS, Shepherd WB. Dental and skeletal variation within the range of normal. Angle Orthod 1984;54:1:5-17.
14. Polk MS, Farman AG, Yancy JA, Gholston LR, Johnson BE. Soft tissue profile: A survey of African American preference. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995;108.90-103.
15. Olsen BT, Rieger MR, Johnson CD, Turner DS. Lip position of different facial types as esthetically perceived by lay persons and professionals. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1996;109:3:338.
16. Connor AM, Moshiri F. Orthognathic surgery norms for American black patients. Am J Orthod 1985;87:119-34.
17. Fonseca RI, Klein WD. A cephalometric evaluation of American Negro women. Am J Orthod 1978;73:152-60.
18. Burstone CJ. Integumental contour and extension patterns. Angle Orthod 1959;29:93-104.
19. Worms FW, Isaacson RI, Speidel TM. Surgical orthodontic treatment planning: Profile analysis and mandibular surgery. Angle Orthod 1976;46:1-25.
20. Farkas LG, Hreczko TA, Kolar JC, Munro IR. Vertical and horizontal proportions of the face in young adult North American Caucasians: Revision of neoclassical canons. Plastic and Reconstr Surg 1985;75:3:328-37.
21. Farkas LG, Katie MJ, Hreczko TA, Deutsch C, Munro IR. Anthropometric proportions in the upper lip-lower lip-chin area of the lower face in young white adults. Am J Orthod 1984;86:1:52-60.
22. Belinfante LS. Total treatment planning for esthetic problems of the face: A team approach. J Oral Surg 1979;37:178-86.
23. DeSmit A, Dermaut L. Soft-tissue profile preference. Am J Orthod 1984;86:67-73.
24. Morris W. An orthodontic view of dentofacial esthetics. Compendium. 1994;15:3:378-82.
25. Forsberg CM, Linder-Aronson A, Eliasson S. Skeletal and soft tissue profile changes during 20 years of adulthood. Europ J Orthod 1994;16:335.
26. Behrents RG. Growth in the aging craniofacial skeleton. Monograph 17, Craniofacial Growth series. Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, 1985.
27. Peck H, Peck S. The aesthetically pleasing face: An orthodontic myth. Trans Europ Orthod Soc 1971;175-85.
28. Opdebeeck H, Bell WH. The short face syndrome. Am J Orthod 1978;73:499-511.