Choosing appropriate method guidelines for web-ontology building

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3716 LNCS, Issue , 2005, Pages 270-287

  Hakkarainen, Sari ^a   Strasunskas, Darijus ^a,b   Hella, Lillian ^a   Tuxen, Stine ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b VILNIUS UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATION THEORY; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SEMANTICS;

ONTOLOGY LANGUAGE; SEMANTIC WEB APPLICATIONS; WEB-ONTOLOGY;

WORLD WIDE WEB;

EID: 33646186047     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11568322_18     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Becker, J., Rosemann, M., von Uthmann, C. Guidelines of Business Process Modeling. In W. Aalst, J. Desel, A. Oberweis (Eds.): Business Process Management: Models, Techniques and Empirical Studies. LNCS 1806, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 30-49, 2000.
2. Berners-Lee T, Handler J, Lassila O. The Semantic Web. Scientific American, May 2001.
3. Corcho, O., Fernández-López, M., Gómez-Pérez, A. Methodologies, tools and languages for building ontologies: where is their meeting point?, Data and Knowledge Engineering, 46(1) pp. 41 - 64, 2003.
4. th CAiSE/IFIP8.1 International Workshop on Evaluation of Modeling Methods in System Analysis and Design (EMMSAD'03), Velden, Austria, June 16-17, 2003.
5. Denker, G.: DAML+OIL Plug-in for Protégé 2000 - User's Guide. SRI International AI Center Report 7/8/03, 2003.
6. Falkenberg, E.D., Hesse, W., Lindgreen, P., Nilsson, B.E., Han Oei, J.L., Rolland, C., Stamper, R.K., van Asche, F.J.M., Verrjin-Stuart, A., Voss, K. FRISCO - A Framework of Information Systems Concepts. IFIP WG 8.1 Technical Report, 1997.
7. Fernández-López, M. Overview of Methodologies for Building Ontologies. In Benjamins, V.R., Chandrasekaran, B., Gómez-Pérez, A., Guarino, N., Uschold, M. (Eds.): Proceedings of the IJCAI-99 workshop on Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods (KRR5) Stockholm, Sweden, 1999.
8. Fernándes-Lopez, M., Gómez-Péres, A., Juriso, N. METHONTOLOGY: From Ontological Art Towards Ontological Engineering. In Proceedings of AAAI-97 Spring Symposium on Ontological Engineering. Stanford University, 1997.
9. Gemino, A., Wand, Y. Evaluating modelling techniques based on models of learning. Communications of the ACM 46(10), pp. 79-84, 2003.
10. Gómez-Péres, A., Corcho, O. Ontology Languages for the Semantic Web. IEEE Intelligent Systems, pp. 54-60, 2002.
11. Gruber, T.R. A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications. Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2), pp. 199-220, 1993.
12. th International Baltic Conference on Databases and Information Systems (Baltic DBIS'04), volume 672 of CSIT, pp. 451-466. University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia, 2004.
13. th CAiSE/IFIP8.I International Workshop on Evaluation of Modeling Methods in Systems Analysis and Design (EMMSAD'05), June 2005.
14. nd Intl. Semantic Web Conf., Sanibel Island Florida USA. October 20-23, 2003.
15. Krogstie, J. Using a Semiotic Framework to Evaluate UML for the Development of Models of High Quality. In Siau, K. and Halpin, T. (eds.): Unified Modeling Language: Systems analysis, design, and development issues. IDEA Group Publishing, 2001.
16. Krogstie, J. Evaluating UML Using a Generic Quality Framework. In Favre L (ed.): UML and the Unified Process. IDEA Group Publishing, 2003.
17. Krogstie, J.and de Flon Arnesen, S. Assessing enterprise modeling languages using a generic quality framework. In J. Krogstie, T. Halpin, and K. Siau (eds.), Information Modeling Methods and Methodologies, number 1537-9299 in ATDR, chapter IV, pp. 63-79. IDEA Group Publishing, 2004.
18. Krogstie J, Sølvberg A.. Information Systems Engineering - Conceptual modelling in a quality perspective, Kompendiumforlaget, Trondheim, Norway, (2003).
19. Lindland, O.I., Sindre, G., Sølvberg, A. Understanding Quality in Conceptual Modeling. IEEE Software, 11(2), pp. 42-49, 1994
20. Maiden, N.A.M., Ncube, C.: Acquiring COTS Software Selection Requirements. IEEE Software, 15(2), pp 46-56, 1998.
21. th International Conference on Conceptual Modelling (ER '98), LNCS 1507, Springer-Verlag, Singapore, 1998.
22. Noy, N.F., McGuinness, D.L. Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology'. Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory Technical Report KSL-01-05, March 2001.
23. Opdahl, A.L. and Henderson-Sellers, B. Ontological evaluation of the UML using the Bunge-Wand-Weber model. Software and Systems Modelling (SoSyM) 1(1), pp. 43-67. Springer, 2002.
24. Pohl, K. Three dimensions of requirements engineering: a framework and its applications. Information Systems 19(3), pp. 243-258, 1994.
25. th International Conference on Conceptual Modelling (ER'99), Paris, France, LNCS 1728, Springer-Verlag, 1999.
26. th International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems (CoopIS'2003), Springer-Verlag, LNCS2888, pp. 218-234, 2003.
27. Su, X. and Ilebrekke, L. Using a semiotic framework for a comparative study of ontology languages and tools. In J. Krogstie, T. Halpin, and K. Siau (eds.): Information Modeling Methods and Methodologies, number 1537-9299 in ATDR, chapter XIV, pages 278-299. IDEA Group Publishing, 2004.
28. Sure, Y., Studer, R. On-To.Knowledge Methodology - Final Version. Institute AIFB, University of Karlsruhe. September 26, 2002.
29. Swartout, B., Ramesh P., Knight, K., Russ, T.: Toward Distributed Use of Large-Scale Ontologies. In Proceedings of Symposium on Ontological Engineering of AAAI. Stanford, California, 1997.
30. th Conf. of the British Computer Society Specialist Group on Expert Systems. Cambridge, UK, 1996.
31. Uschold, M., Gruninger, M. Ontologies: Principles, methods and applications. Knowledge Engineering Review, 11(2), pp. 93-155, 1996.
32. Wand, Y., Weber, R. Mario Bunge's Ontology as a formal foundation for information systems concepts. In: Weingartner, P. and Dorn, G. (eds.): Studies on Mario Bunge's Treatise, Rodopi, Atlanta, 1990.
33. Weber, R., Zhang, Y. An analytical evaluation of NIAM's grammar for conceptual schema diagrams. Information Systems Journal 6(2), pp. 147-170, 1996.