Implementing High School ReformThrough School-Wide Action Research Teams: A Three Year Case Study

Action in Teacher Education

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 15-31

  Harris, Brigitte ^a   Drake, Susan M ^a  

^a BROCK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646178642     PISSN: 01626620     EISSN: 21586098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01626620.1997.10462876     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Atkinson, S., 1994. Rethinking the principles and practice of action research: The tensions for a teacher-researcher. Educational Action Research, 2 (3): 383–401.
2. Beatty, M., and Shaw, P., 1994. Conceptualizing the teacher's role: An interview with Michael Fullan. Orbit, 25 (4): 6–8.
3. Bickel, W., and Hattrup, R., 1995. Teachers and researchers in collaboration: Reflections on the process. American Educational Research Journal, 32 (1): 3562
4. Bondy, E., 1995. “ Fredericks Middle School and the dynamics of school reform ”. In The work of restructuring schools: Building from the ground up, Edited by: Leiberman, A., 43–63. New York: Teachers College Press.
5. Bull, B., Buechler, M., Didley, S., and Krehbiel, L., 1994. Professional development and teacher time: Principles, guidelines and options for Indiana, Indiana University, School of Education Office. (Report for Indiana Policy Center)
6. Clark, R. W., 1988. “ School-university relationships: An interpretive review ”. In School-university partnerships in action-Concepts, cases and concerns, Edited by: Sirotnik, K. A., and Goodlad, J. L., 32–65. New York: Teachers College Press.
7. 1995. The Common Curriculum, Toronto, ON: Ministry of Education and Training, Government of Ontario.
8. Connelly, F. M., and Clandinin, D. J., 1988. Teachers as curriculum planners: Narratives of experience, New York: Teachers College Press/Toronto: OISE Press.
9. Darling-Hammond, L., 1993. Reframing the school reform agenda. Phi Delta Kappan, 74 (10): 752–761.
10. Firestone, W. A., and Pennell, J. R., 1997. Designing state sponsored teacher networks: A comparison of two cases. American Educational Research Journal, 34 (2): 237–266.
11. Fraenkel, J. R., and Wallen, N. E., 1990. How to design and evaluate research in education, New York: McGraw-Hill.
12. Fullan, M. G., 1993. The change forces, London: Falmer Press.
13. Fullan, M. G., 1996. Turning systemic thinking on its head. Phi Delta Kappan, 77 (6): 420–423.
14. Fullan, M., and Miles, M., 1992. Getting reform right: What works and what doesn't. Phi Delta Kappan, 73 (10): 745–752.
15. Hajnal, V., Sackney, L., and Walker, K., Shared leadership: A necessary ingredient. Paper presented at 1996 Annual Meeting of the Canadian Society for Studies in Education, Brock University. St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada.
16. Hargreaves, A., 1993. Individualism and individuality: Reinterpreting the teacher culture. International Journal of Educational Research, 19 (3): 51–76.
17. Hargreaves, A., 1994. The changing world of teaching in the 1990s. Orbit, 25 (4): 2–5.
18. Hirsch, S., 1997. “ Everyone benefits when teachers lead ”. In School Team Innovator 2 (March 2)
19. Johnson, S., 1994. Is action research a natural process?. Educational Action Research, 2 (1): 39–48.
20. Johnson, S., 1993. Action research as a school-level change process. Curriculum Perspectives, 13 (1): 21–28.
21. Kemmis, S., and McTaggart, R., 1988. The action research reader, 3rd ed., Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.
22. Lambert, L., 1995. “ Constructing school change ”. In The constructivist leader, Edited by: Lambert, L., Walker, D., Zimmerman, D., Cooper, J., Lambert, M., Gardner, M., and Slack, P. J. Ford. 52–82. New York: Teachers College Press.
23. Leduc, G., and Mahony, M., 1995. Making change a friendly constant: A blueprint for staff involvement. Orbit, 25 (3): 28–31.
24. Lieberman, A., 1995. “ Restructuring schools: The dynamics of changing practice, structure and culture ”. In The work of restructuring schools, Edited by: Lieberman, A., 1–17. New York: Teachers College Press.
25. Lipsitz, J., Mizell, M. H., Jackson, A. W., and Austin, L., 1997. Speaking with one voice: A manifesto for middle-grades reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 78 (7): 533–550.
26. Miller, J., Drake, S., Harris, B., Haskins, B., and Molinaro, V., Negotiating new models of education (Report year two). Presented at 1996 Annual Meeting of the Canadian Society for Studies in Education. St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada.
27. Miller, J., Drake, S., Bass, S., Campbell, N., and Haskins, B., Negotiating new models of education. Presented at 1995 Annual Meeting of the Canadian Society for Studies in Education. Montreal, Quebec, Canada. (Report year one)
28. Richardson, J., 1997a. “ Dealing with resistors biggest challenge for staff developers ”. In The Developer 14 (March)
29. Richardson, J., 1997b. “ Teachers can be leaders of change ”. In School Team Innovator 14 (March)
30. Patton, M. Q., 1990. Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Pellicer, L. O., and Anderson, L. W., 1995. A handbook for teacher leaders, Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
32. Senge, P., 1990. The fifth discipline, New York: Doubleday.
33. Siskin, L., 1995. “ Subject divisions ”. In The subject in question, Edited by: Siskin, L., and Little, J. W., 23–47. New York: Teachers College Press.
34. Strauss, A., and Corbin, J., 1990. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and technique, London: Sage.
35. Wilson, S. M., Peterson, P. L., Ball, D. L., and Cohen, D. K., 1996. Learning by all. Phi Delta Kappan, 77 (7): 468–476.
36. Zuber-Skerritt, O., 1996. “ Emancipatory research for organizational change and management development ”. In New directions in action research, Edited by: Zuber-Skerritt, O., 83–105. London: Falmer Press.